Evaluating Neighborhood Green-Space Quality Using a Building Blue–Green Index (BBGI) in Nanjing, China

High-quality urban green space (UGS) is an integral part of a livable city. The scientific evaluation of UGS has great value for improving the quality and efficiency of green spaces. In this study, we integrated the water and walking networks into the existing green index model and proposed a new gr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhiming Li, Xiyang Chen, Zhou Shen, Zhengxi Fan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/445
_version_ 1797446141518807040
author Zhiming Li
Xiyang Chen
Zhou Shen
Zhengxi Fan
author_facet Zhiming Li
Xiyang Chen
Zhou Shen
Zhengxi Fan
author_sort Zhiming Li
collection DOAJ
description High-quality urban green space (UGS) is an integral part of a livable city. The scientific evaluation of UGS has great value for improving the quality and efficiency of green spaces. In this study, we integrated the water and walking networks into the existing green index model and proposed a new green index: the building blue–green index (BBGI). Using this method, we analyzed the quality of green spaces within 300 m of 2138 buildings located in 13 communities in the Mochou Lake subdistrict in Nanjing, China. The results revealed that the green-space quality of high-rise, low-density buildings was greater than that of low-rise, high-density buildings. In addition, buildings close to water had higher green-space quality, while impervious surfaces reduced green-space quality. Furthermore, the connectivity and orientation of the road network indicated that even if a community was close to large parks and water bodies, there would still be lower green-space quality. This study’s findings highlight the usefulness of evaluation methods for green-space quality that combine blue and green spaces. We also propose feasible measures for improving neighborhood green-space planning and land management.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T13:35:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-52162de476a943138d89558357315df4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T13:35:56Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-52162de476a943138d89558357315df42023-11-30T21:11:59ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2022-03-0111344510.3390/land11030445Evaluating Neighborhood Green-Space Quality Using a Building Blue–Green Index (BBGI) in Nanjing, ChinaZhiming Li0Xiyang Chen1Zhou Shen2Zhengxi Fan3College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, ChinaCollege of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, ChinaSuzhou Polytechnic Institute of Agriculture, Suzhou 215008, ChinaSchool of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, ChinaHigh-quality urban green space (UGS) is an integral part of a livable city. The scientific evaluation of UGS has great value for improving the quality and efficiency of green spaces. In this study, we integrated the water and walking networks into the existing green index model and proposed a new green index: the building blue–green index (BBGI). Using this method, we analyzed the quality of green spaces within 300 m of 2138 buildings located in 13 communities in the Mochou Lake subdistrict in Nanjing, China. The results revealed that the green-space quality of high-rise, low-density buildings was greater than that of low-rise, high-density buildings. In addition, buildings close to water had higher green-space quality, while impervious surfaces reduced green-space quality. Furthermore, the connectivity and orientation of the road network indicated that even if a community was close to large parks and water bodies, there would still be lower green-space quality. This study’s findings highlight the usefulness of evaluation methods for green-space quality that combine blue and green spaces. We also propose feasible measures for improving neighborhood green-space planning and land management.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/445urban green spacebuilding blue–green indexneighborhoodhigh-resolution remoting-sensing imagenetwork analysisChina
spellingShingle Zhiming Li
Xiyang Chen
Zhou Shen
Zhengxi Fan
Evaluating Neighborhood Green-Space Quality Using a Building Blue–Green Index (BBGI) in Nanjing, China
Land
urban green space
building blue–green index
neighborhood
high-resolution remoting-sensing image
network analysis
China
title Evaluating Neighborhood Green-Space Quality Using a Building Blue–Green Index (BBGI) in Nanjing, China
title_full Evaluating Neighborhood Green-Space Quality Using a Building Blue–Green Index (BBGI) in Nanjing, China
title_fullStr Evaluating Neighborhood Green-Space Quality Using a Building Blue–Green Index (BBGI) in Nanjing, China
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Neighborhood Green-Space Quality Using a Building Blue–Green Index (BBGI) in Nanjing, China
title_short Evaluating Neighborhood Green-Space Quality Using a Building Blue–Green Index (BBGI) in Nanjing, China
title_sort evaluating neighborhood green space quality using a building blue green index bbgi in nanjing china
topic urban green space
building blue–green index
neighborhood
high-resolution remoting-sensing image
network analysis
China
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/445
work_keys_str_mv AT zhimingli evaluatingneighborhoodgreenspacequalityusingabuildingbluegreenindexbbgiinnanjingchina
AT xiyangchen evaluatingneighborhoodgreenspacequalityusingabuildingbluegreenindexbbgiinnanjingchina
AT zhoushen evaluatingneighborhoodgreenspacequalityusingabuildingbluegreenindexbbgiinnanjingchina
AT zhengxifan evaluatingneighborhoodgreenspacequalityusingabuildingbluegreenindexbbgiinnanjingchina