Occupational Health Policies on Risk Assessment in Japan

Industrial Safety and Health Law (ISH Law) of Japan requires abnormalities identifi ed in evaluations of worker health and working environments are reported to occupational physicians, and employers are advised of measures to ensure appropriate accommodations in working environments and work procedu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Seichi Horie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2010-09-01
Series:Safety and Health at Work
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791110110038
_version_ 1797727343197814784
author Seichi Horie
author_facet Seichi Horie
author_sort Seichi Horie
collection DOAJ
description Industrial Safety and Health Law (ISH Law) of Japan requires abnormalities identifi ed in evaluations of worker health and working environments are reported to occupational physicians, and employers are advised of measures to ensure appropriate accommodations in working environments and work procedures. Since the 1980s, notions of a risk assessment and occupational safety and health management system were expected to further prevent industrial accidents. In 2005, ISH Law stipulated workplace risk assessment using the wording “employers shall endeavor.” Following the amendment, multiple documents and guidelines for risk assessment for different work procedures were developed. They require ISH Laws to be implemented fully and workplaces to plan and execute measures to reduce risks, ranking them from those addressing potential hazards to those requiring workers to wear protective articles. A governmental survey in 2005 found the performance of risk assessment was 20.4% and common reasons for not implementing risk assessments were lack of adequate personnel or knowledge. ISH Law specifi es criminal penalties for both individuals and organizations. Moreover, under the Labor Contract Law promulgated in 2007, employers are obliged to make reasonable efforts to ensure employee health for foreseeable and avoidable risks. Therefore, enterprises neglecting even the non-binding provisions of guidelines are likely to suffer signifi cant business impact if judged to be responsible for industrial accidents or occupational disease. To promote risk assessment, we must strengthen technical, fi nancial, and physical support from public-service organizations, encourage the dissemination of good practices to reduce risks, and consider additional employer incentives, including relaxed mandatory regulations.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:58:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-521fd039c19e4618919f070406df2f0c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2093-7911
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:58:28Z
publishDate 2010-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Safety and Health at Work
spelling doaj.art-521fd039c19e4618919f070406df2f0c2023-09-02T06:00:01ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112010-09-0111192810.5491/SHAW.2010.1.1.19Occupational Health Policies on Risk Assessment in JapanSeichi HorieIndustrial Safety and Health Law (ISH Law) of Japan requires abnormalities identifi ed in evaluations of worker health and working environments are reported to occupational physicians, and employers are advised of measures to ensure appropriate accommodations in working environments and work procedures. Since the 1980s, notions of a risk assessment and occupational safety and health management system were expected to further prevent industrial accidents. In 2005, ISH Law stipulated workplace risk assessment using the wording “employers shall endeavor.” Following the amendment, multiple documents and guidelines for risk assessment for different work procedures were developed. They require ISH Laws to be implemented fully and workplaces to plan and execute measures to reduce risks, ranking them from those addressing potential hazards to those requiring workers to wear protective articles. A governmental survey in 2005 found the performance of risk assessment was 20.4% and common reasons for not implementing risk assessments were lack of adequate personnel or knowledge. ISH Law specifi es criminal penalties for both individuals and organizations. Moreover, under the Labor Contract Law promulgated in 2007, employers are obliged to make reasonable efforts to ensure employee health for foreseeable and avoidable risks. Therefore, enterprises neglecting even the non-binding provisions of guidelines are likely to suffer signifi cant business impact if judged to be responsible for industrial accidents or occupational disease. To promote risk assessment, we must strengthen technical, fi nancial, and physical support from public-service organizations, encourage the dissemination of good practices to reduce risks, and consider additional employer incentives, including relaxed mandatory regulations.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791110110038Occupational health servicesHealth policyRisk assessmentRisk managementOccupational health and safety management system
spellingShingle Seichi Horie
Occupational Health Policies on Risk Assessment in Japan
Safety and Health at Work
Occupational health services
Health policy
Risk assessment
Risk management
Occupational health and safety management system
title Occupational Health Policies on Risk Assessment in Japan
title_full Occupational Health Policies on Risk Assessment in Japan
title_fullStr Occupational Health Policies on Risk Assessment in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Occupational Health Policies on Risk Assessment in Japan
title_short Occupational Health Policies on Risk Assessment in Japan
title_sort occupational health policies on risk assessment in japan
topic Occupational health services
Health policy
Risk assessment
Risk management
Occupational health and safety management system
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791110110038
work_keys_str_mv AT seichihorie occupationalhealthpoliciesonriskassessmentinjapan