Convolutional neural network (CNN)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis: a comparison between standard twelve-lead and single-lead setups

BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in the early detection of various cardiac conditions from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). However, the ability of AI to identify abnormalities from single-lead recordings across a range of pathological conditions remains to be syst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Saglietto, Daniele Baccega, Roberto Esposito, Matteo Anselmino, Veronica Dusi, Attilio Fiandrotti, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1327179/full
_version_ 1827318195004899328
author Andrea Saglietto
Andrea Saglietto
Daniele Baccega
Daniele Baccega
Roberto Esposito
Matteo Anselmino
Matteo Anselmino
Veronica Dusi
Veronica Dusi
Attilio Fiandrotti
Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
author_facet Andrea Saglietto
Andrea Saglietto
Daniele Baccega
Daniele Baccega
Roberto Esposito
Matteo Anselmino
Matteo Anselmino
Veronica Dusi
Veronica Dusi
Attilio Fiandrotti
Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
author_sort Andrea Saglietto
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in the early detection of various cardiac conditions from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). However, the ability of AI to identify abnormalities from single-lead recordings across a range of pathological conditions remains to be systematically investigated. This study aims to assess the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) using a single-lead (D1) rather than a standard 12-lead setup for accurate identification of ECG abnormalities.MethodsWe designed and trained a lightweight CNN to identify 20 different cardiac abnormalities on ECGs, using data from the PTB-XL dataset. With a relatively simple architecture, the network was designed to accommodate different combinations of leads as input (<100,000 learnable parameters). We compared various lead setups such as the standard 12-lead, D1 alone, and D1 paired with an additional lead.ResultsThe CNN based on single-lead ECG (D1) achieved satisfactory performance compared to the standard 12-lead framework (average percentage AUC difference: −8.7%). Notably, for certain diagnostic classes, there was no difference in the diagnostic AUC between the single-lead and the standard 12-lead setups. When a second lead was detected in the CNN in addition to D1, the AUC gap was further reduced to an average percentage difference of −2.8% compared with that of the standard 12-lead setup.ConclusionsA relatively lightweight CNN can predict different classes of cardiac abnormalities from D1 alone and the standard 12-lead ECG. Considering the growing availability of wearable devices capable of recording a D1-like single-lead ECG, we discuss how our findings contribute to the foundation of a large-scale screening of cardiac abnormalities.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T00:50:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-52303fbdb09b4f3fbbe4b2beb20d4a48
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T23:53:55Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-52303fbdb09b4f3fbbe4b2beb20d4a482024-03-14T16:01:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2024-02-011110.3389/fcvm.2024.13271791327179Convolutional neural network (CNN)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis: a comparison between standard twelve-lead and single-lead setupsAndrea Saglietto0Andrea Saglietto1Daniele Baccega2Daniele Baccega3Roberto Esposito4Matteo Anselmino5Matteo Anselmino6Veronica Dusi7Veronica Dusi8Attilio Fiandrotti9Gaetano Maria De Ferrari10Gaetano Maria De Ferrari11Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, “Citta della Salute e della Scienza” Hospital, Turin, ItalyDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, ItalyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Turin, Turin, ItalyLaboratorio InfoLife, Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per l'Informatica (CINI), Rome, ItalyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Turin, Turin, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, “Citta della Salute e della Scienza” Hospital, Turin, ItalyDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, “Citta della Salute e della Scienza” Hospital, Turin, ItalyDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, ItalyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Turin, Turin, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, “Citta della Salute e della Scienza” Hospital, Turin, ItalyDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, ItalyBackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in the early detection of various cardiac conditions from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). However, the ability of AI to identify abnormalities from single-lead recordings across a range of pathological conditions remains to be systematically investigated. This study aims to assess the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) using a single-lead (D1) rather than a standard 12-lead setup for accurate identification of ECG abnormalities.MethodsWe designed and trained a lightweight CNN to identify 20 different cardiac abnormalities on ECGs, using data from the PTB-XL dataset. With a relatively simple architecture, the network was designed to accommodate different combinations of leads as input (<100,000 learnable parameters). We compared various lead setups such as the standard 12-lead, D1 alone, and D1 paired with an additional lead.ResultsThe CNN based on single-lead ECG (D1) achieved satisfactory performance compared to the standard 12-lead framework (average percentage AUC difference: −8.7%). Notably, for certain diagnostic classes, there was no difference in the diagnostic AUC between the single-lead and the standard 12-lead setups. When a second lead was detected in the CNN in addition to D1, the AUC gap was further reduced to an average percentage difference of −2.8% compared with that of the standard 12-lead setup.ConclusionsA relatively lightweight CNN can predict different classes of cardiac abnormalities from D1 alone and the standard 12-lead ECG. Considering the growing availability of wearable devices capable of recording a D1-like single-lead ECG, we discuss how our findings contribute to the foundation of a large-scale screening of cardiac abnormalities.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1327179/fullartificial intelligencedeep learningelectrocardiogramsingle-leadscreening
spellingShingle Andrea Saglietto
Andrea Saglietto
Daniele Baccega
Daniele Baccega
Roberto Esposito
Matteo Anselmino
Matteo Anselmino
Veronica Dusi
Veronica Dusi
Attilio Fiandrotti
Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
Convolutional neural network (CNN)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis: a comparison between standard twelve-lead and single-lead setups
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
artificial intelligence
deep learning
electrocardiogram
single-lead
screening
title Convolutional neural network (CNN)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis: a comparison between standard twelve-lead and single-lead setups
title_full Convolutional neural network (CNN)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis: a comparison between standard twelve-lead and single-lead setups
title_fullStr Convolutional neural network (CNN)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis: a comparison between standard twelve-lead and single-lead setups
title_full_unstemmed Convolutional neural network (CNN)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis: a comparison between standard twelve-lead and single-lead setups
title_short Convolutional neural network (CNN)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis: a comparison between standard twelve-lead and single-lead setups
title_sort convolutional neural network cnn enabled electrocardiogram ecg analysis a comparison between standard twelve lead and single lead setups
topic artificial intelligence
deep learning
electrocardiogram
single-lead
screening
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1327179/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasaglietto convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups
AT andreasaglietto convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups
AT danielebaccega convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups
AT danielebaccega convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups
AT robertoesposito convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups
AT matteoanselmino convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups
AT matteoanselmino convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups
AT veronicadusi convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups
AT veronicadusi convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups
AT attiliofiandrotti convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups
AT gaetanomariadeferrari convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups
AT gaetanomariadeferrari convolutionalneuralnetworkcnnenabledelectrocardiogramecganalysisacomparisonbetweenstandardtwelveleadandsingleleadsetups