Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
Abstract This study was aimed at the effects of different Creep-feeding protocols on piglet performance and its residual effects during the nursery phase. Experimental design used was five groups: WC (without creep); DCF (dry creep feeding); WCF (wet creep feeding); LD (additional liquid creep with...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Academia Brasileira de Ciências
2022-11-01
|
Series: | Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652022000601317&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1811323017726263296 |
---|---|
author | FERNANDO ZIMMER GABRIELA M. GALLI HIAM J. MARCON DAVI F. ALBA LUIZ GRISS KEYSUKE MURAMATSU ALEKSANDRO S. DA SILVA DIOVANI PAIANO |
author_facet | FERNANDO ZIMMER GABRIELA M. GALLI HIAM J. MARCON DAVI F. ALBA LUIZ GRISS KEYSUKE MURAMATSU ALEKSANDRO S. DA SILVA DIOVANI PAIANO |
author_sort | FERNANDO ZIMMER |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract This study was aimed at the effects of different Creep-feeding protocols on piglet performance and its residual effects during the nursery phase. Experimental design used was five groups: WC (without creep); DCF (dry creep feeding); WCF (wet creep feeding); LD (additional liquid creep with automatic feed dispenser plus DCF); and LLF (additional liquid creep with linear feeder plus DCF). Ten litters per treatment were selected a total 50 sows and 645 piglets. During the first two weeks of lactation, the LD treatment (2.61 and 4.20 kg) promoted greater body weight (P <0.001) than the DCF (2.55 and 3.93 kg), (WFS) (2.43 and 3.69 kg) and LLF (2.50 and 4.00 kg) treatments, but did not differ from the WC treatment (2.68 and 4.09 kg). At weaning, the WC (5.22 kg), LD (5.32 kg) and LLF (5.27 kg) treatments gave higher body weights (P <0.001) when compared to the DCF (4.97 kg) and WCF (4.69 kg) treatments. We concluded that there was no change in the behavior of the piglets, and the use of dry feed with liquid supplements did not improve weight gain. The different creep feeding systems did not influence the weight and performance of the piglets in the nursery phase. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T13:46:36Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-5239c21a02964fe580e7b5e72b56eb0a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1678-2690 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T13:46:36Z |
publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
publisher | Academia Brasileira de Ciências |
record_format | Article |
series | Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências |
spelling | doaj.art-5239c21a02964fe580e7b5e72b56eb0a2022-12-22T02:44:28ZengAcademia Brasileira de CiênciasAnais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências1678-26902022-11-0194410.1590/0001-3765202220201500Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phaseFERNANDO ZIMMERhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3842-5528GABRIELA M. GALLIhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-8659HIAM J. MARCONhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6380-4397DAVI F. ALBAhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3455-0479LUIZ GRISShttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2814-8782KEYSUKE MURAMATSUhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2334-2594ALEKSANDRO S. DA SILVAhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9860-1933DIOVANI PAIANOhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-9524Abstract This study was aimed at the effects of different Creep-feeding protocols on piglet performance and its residual effects during the nursery phase. Experimental design used was five groups: WC (without creep); DCF (dry creep feeding); WCF (wet creep feeding); LD (additional liquid creep with automatic feed dispenser plus DCF); and LLF (additional liquid creep with linear feeder plus DCF). Ten litters per treatment were selected a total 50 sows and 645 piglets. During the first two weeks of lactation, the LD treatment (2.61 and 4.20 kg) promoted greater body weight (P <0.001) than the DCF (2.55 and 3.93 kg), (WFS) (2.43 and 3.69 kg) and LLF (2.50 and 4.00 kg) treatments, but did not differ from the WC treatment (2.68 and 4.09 kg). At weaning, the WC (5.22 kg), LD (5.32 kg) and LLF (5.27 kg) treatments gave higher body weights (P <0.001) when compared to the DCF (4.97 kg) and WCF (4.69 kg) treatments. We concluded that there was no change in the behavior of the piglets, and the use of dry feed with liquid supplements did not improve weight gain. The different creep feeding systems did not influence the weight and performance of the piglets in the nursery phase.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652022000601317&tlng=enbehaviorfeederlitterpiglet handling |
spellingShingle | FERNANDO ZIMMER GABRIELA M. GALLI HIAM J. MARCON DAVI F. ALBA LUIZ GRISS KEYSUKE MURAMATSU ALEKSANDRO S. DA SILVA DIOVANI PAIANO Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências behavior feeder litter piglet handling |
title | Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase |
title_full | Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase |
title_fullStr | Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase |
title_full_unstemmed | Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase |
title_short | Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase |
title_sort | different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase |
topic | behavior feeder litter piglet handling |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652022000601317&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandozimmer differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase AT gabrielamgalli differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase AT hiamjmarcon differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase AT davifalba differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase AT luizgriss differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase AT keysukemuramatsu differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase AT aleksandrosdasilva differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase AT diovanipaiano differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase |