Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase

Abstract This study was aimed at the effects of different Creep-feeding protocols on piglet performance and its residual effects during the nursery phase. Experimental design used was five groups: WC (without creep); DCF (dry creep feeding); WCF (wet creep feeding); LD (additional liquid creep with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: FERNANDO ZIMMER, GABRIELA M. GALLI, HIAM J. MARCON, DAVI F. ALBA, LUIZ GRISS, KEYSUKE MURAMATSU, ALEKSANDRO S. DA SILVA, DIOVANI PAIANO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academia Brasileira de Ciências 2022-11-01
Series:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652022000601317&tlng=en
_version_ 1811323017726263296
author FERNANDO ZIMMER
GABRIELA M. GALLI
HIAM J. MARCON
DAVI F. ALBA
LUIZ GRISS
KEYSUKE MURAMATSU
ALEKSANDRO S. DA SILVA
DIOVANI PAIANO
author_facet FERNANDO ZIMMER
GABRIELA M. GALLI
HIAM J. MARCON
DAVI F. ALBA
LUIZ GRISS
KEYSUKE MURAMATSU
ALEKSANDRO S. DA SILVA
DIOVANI PAIANO
author_sort FERNANDO ZIMMER
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study was aimed at the effects of different Creep-feeding protocols on piglet performance and its residual effects during the nursery phase. Experimental design used was five groups: WC (without creep); DCF (dry creep feeding); WCF (wet creep feeding); LD (additional liquid creep with automatic feed dispenser plus DCF); and LLF (additional liquid creep with linear feeder plus DCF). Ten litters per treatment were selected a total 50 sows and 645 piglets. During the first two weeks of lactation, the LD treatment (2.61 and 4.20 kg) promoted greater body weight (P <0.001) than the DCF (2.55 and 3.93 kg), (WFS) (2.43 and 3.69 kg) and LLF (2.50 and 4.00 kg) treatments, but did not differ from the WC treatment (2.68 and 4.09 kg). At weaning, the WC (5.22 kg), LD (5.32 kg) and LLF (5.27 kg) treatments gave higher body weights (P <0.001) when compared to the DCF (4.97 kg) and WCF (4.69 kg) treatments. We concluded that there was no change in the behavior of the piglets, and the use of dry feed with liquid supplements did not improve weight gain. The different creep feeding systems did not influence the weight and performance of the piglets in the nursery phase.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T13:46:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5239c21a02964fe580e7b5e72b56eb0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-2690
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T13:46:36Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Academia Brasileira de Ciências
record_format Article
series Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
spelling doaj.art-5239c21a02964fe580e7b5e72b56eb0a2022-12-22T02:44:28ZengAcademia Brasileira de CiênciasAnais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências1678-26902022-11-0194410.1590/0001-3765202220201500Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phaseFERNANDO ZIMMERhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3842-5528GABRIELA M. GALLIhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-8659HIAM J. MARCONhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6380-4397DAVI F. ALBAhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3455-0479LUIZ GRISShttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2814-8782KEYSUKE MURAMATSUhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2334-2594ALEKSANDRO S. DA SILVAhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9860-1933DIOVANI PAIANOhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-9524Abstract This study was aimed at the effects of different Creep-feeding protocols on piglet performance and its residual effects during the nursery phase. Experimental design used was five groups: WC (without creep); DCF (dry creep feeding); WCF (wet creep feeding); LD (additional liquid creep with automatic feed dispenser plus DCF); and LLF (additional liquid creep with linear feeder plus DCF). Ten litters per treatment were selected a total 50 sows and 645 piglets. During the first two weeks of lactation, the LD treatment (2.61 and 4.20 kg) promoted greater body weight (P <0.001) than the DCF (2.55 and 3.93 kg), (WFS) (2.43 and 3.69 kg) and LLF (2.50 and 4.00 kg) treatments, but did not differ from the WC treatment (2.68 and 4.09 kg). At weaning, the WC (5.22 kg), LD (5.32 kg) and LLF (5.27 kg) treatments gave higher body weights (P <0.001) when compared to the DCF (4.97 kg) and WCF (4.69 kg) treatments. We concluded that there was no change in the behavior of the piglets, and the use of dry feed with liquid supplements did not improve weight gain. The different creep feeding systems did not influence the weight and performance of the piglets in the nursery phase.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652022000601317&tlng=enbehaviorfeederlitterpiglet handling
spellingShingle FERNANDO ZIMMER
GABRIELA M. GALLI
HIAM J. MARCON
DAVI F. ALBA
LUIZ GRISS
KEYSUKE MURAMATSU
ALEKSANDRO S. DA SILVA
DIOVANI PAIANO
Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
behavior
feeder
litter
piglet handling
title Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
title_full Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
title_fullStr Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
title_full_unstemmed Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
title_short Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
title_sort different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
topic behavior
feeder
litter
piglet handling
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652022000601317&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandozimmer differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT gabrielamgalli differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT hiamjmarcon differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT davifalba differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT luizgriss differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT keysukemuramatsu differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT aleksandrosdasilva differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT diovanipaiano differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase