Agency matters! Social preferences in the three-person ultimatum game
In the present study EEG was recorded simultaneously while two participants were playing the three-person Ultimatum Game. Both participants received different offers from changing proposers about how to split up a certain amount of money between the three players. One of the participants had no say,...
Main Authors: | Johanna eAlexopoulos, Daniela Melitta Pfabigan, Florian eGöschl, Herbert eBauer, Florian Ph.S Fischmeister |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00312/full |
Similar Items
-
Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three-person ultimatum game.
by: Johanna eAlexopoulos, et al.
Published: (2012-03-01) -
Short- and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior
by: Antonio M. Espín, et al.
Published: (2015-08-01) -
Social comparison affects brain responses to fairness in asset division: An ERP study with the ultimatum game
by: Yin eWu, et al.
Published: (2011-11-01) -
Chimpanzees engage in competitive altruism in a triadic ultimatum game
by: Alejandro Sánchez-Amaro, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Take it or leave it! Experimental evidence on rationality, social preferences and bargaining
by: Luis Palacio, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01)