Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice

<p>In human medicine, the management of care to ensure safety for the service-user constitutes an important element of the patient ‘journey.’ The name given to this discipline is patient safety. It is founded upon those elements of good medical practice which help avoid or mitigate human error...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mark Turner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: RCVS Knowledge 2016-11-01
Series:Veterinary Evidence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/69
_version_ 1818590659265691648
author Mark Turner
author_facet Mark Turner
author_sort Mark Turner
collection DOAJ
description <p>In human medicine, the management of care to ensure safety for the service-user constitutes an important element of the patient ‘journey.’ The name given to this discipline is patient safety. It is founded upon those elements of good medical practice which help avoid or mitigate human error.  Investigations in the U.S. first highlighted the alarming extent of medical error: Brennan et al. (1991) concluded that in the state of New York, the overall rate of adverse events was approximately 4% for hospitalised patients, which equated to over 13,000 deaths a year. Doctors looked to other safety critical industries and aviation in particular (Reason 1995), to address this phenomenon: there is now a wealth of research on the impact of various safety initiatives on measurable rates of harm. The World Health Organisation’s ‘Safe Surgery Saves Lives’ initiative - a campaign that advocates the use of a surgical checklist to standardise aspects of peri-operative care - is one example of aviation methodology successfully employed in a clinical setting (van Klei et al. 2012). The critical importance of effective communication, leadership and situational awareness has also been discussed at length in the human patient safety literature.</p><p>Objectives</p><p>Veterinary patient safety is an analogous discipline and researchers have attempted to understand more about the topic of veterinary medical error. However, the evidence-base for veterinary patient safety is sparse.  This presentation aims to summarise the evidence to date and highlight the benefits in practice of an emerging subject. </p><p>Method</p><p>A search of the terms veterinary patient safety on the PubMed database from 1990 to 2016 was performed.</p><p>Findings</p><p>15 articles were identified as contributing to the veterinary patient safety literature.</p><p>Outcome</p><p>The available literature has addressed a number of areas. The use of checklists in a clinical setting has been proven to reduce the incidence of specific undesirable events: alterations to a standard anaesthetic protocol in light of a clinical audit led to a demonstrable improvement in one North American university hospital (Hofmeister et al. 2014).</p><p>Research into the progenitors of mistakes in practice reveal the effect of poor communication and a lack of team work (Kinnison et al. 2015). Research has also investigated vets’ attitudes toward error and their experiences of it. The psychological precursors to error in our industry seem to mirror those found in human medicine (Oxtoby et al. 2015). The evidence supporting a new attitude and approach to veterinary patient safety is growing.</p><p><a title="Mark Turner's podcast" href="/index.php/ve/article/view/69/91" target="_self"><img src="/public/site/images/bridget/Mark-Turner-audioplayer3.png" alt="" /></a></p><img src="https://www.veterinaryevidence.org/rcvskmod/icons/oa-icon.jpg" alt="Open Access" />
first_indexed 2024-12-16T10:00:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5250962be0ba46269660c8f09afc5fad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2396-9776
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T10:00:03Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher RCVS Knowledge
record_format Article
series Veterinary Evidence
spelling doaj.art-5250962be0ba46269660c8f09afc5fad2022-12-21T22:35:49ZengRCVS KnowledgeVeterinary Evidence2396-97762016-11-011410.18849/ve.v1i4.6937Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based PracticeMark Turner0The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, United Kingdom<p>In human medicine, the management of care to ensure safety for the service-user constitutes an important element of the patient ‘journey.’ The name given to this discipline is patient safety. It is founded upon those elements of good medical practice which help avoid or mitigate human error.  Investigations in the U.S. first highlighted the alarming extent of medical error: Brennan et al. (1991) concluded that in the state of New York, the overall rate of adverse events was approximately 4% for hospitalised patients, which equated to over 13,000 deaths a year. Doctors looked to other safety critical industries and aviation in particular (Reason 1995), to address this phenomenon: there is now a wealth of research on the impact of various safety initiatives on measurable rates of harm. The World Health Organisation’s ‘Safe Surgery Saves Lives’ initiative - a campaign that advocates the use of a surgical checklist to standardise aspects of peri-operative care - is one example of aviation methodology successfully employed in a clinical setting (van Klei et al. 2012). The critical importance of effective communication, leadership and situational awareness has also been discussed at length in the human patient safety literature.</p><p>Objectives</p><p>Veterinary patient safety is an analogous discipline and researchers have attempted to understand more about the topic of veterinary medical error. However, the evidence-base for veterinary patient safety is sparse.  This presentation aims to summarise the evidence to date and highlight the benefits in practice of an emerging subject. </p><p>Method</p><p>A search of the terms veterinary patient safety on the PubMed database from 1990 to 2016 was performed.</p><p>Findings</p><p>15 articles were identified as contributing to the veterinary patient safety literature.</p><p>Outcome</p><p>The available literature has addressed a number of areas. The use of checklists in a clinical setting has been proven to reduce the incidence of specific undesirable events: alterations to a standard anaesthetic protocol in light of a clinical audit led to a demonstrable improvement in one North American university hospital (Hofmeister et al. 2014).</p><p>Research into the progenitors of mistakes in practice reveal the effect of poor communication and a lack of team work (Kinnison et al. 2015). Research has also investigated vets’ attitudes toward error and their experiences of it. The psychological precursors to error in our industry seem to mirror those found in human medicine (Oxtoby et al. 2015). The evidence supporting a new attitude and approach to veterinary patient safety is growing.</p><p><a title="Mark Turner's podcast" href="/index.php/ve/article/view/69/91" target="_self"><img src="/public/site/images/bridget/Mark-Turner-audioplayer3.png" alt="" /></a></p><img src="https://www.veterinaryevidence.org/rcvskmod/icons/oa-icon.jpg" alt="Open Access" />https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/69patient safetyhuman errorEBVM
spellingShingle Mark Turner
Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
Veterinary Evidence
patient safety
human error
EBVM
title Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_full Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_fullStr Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_full_unstemmed Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_short Mistakes, Errors and Foul-Ups: Practice-Based Evidence for Evidence Based Practice
title_sort mistakes errors and foul ups practice based evidence for evidence based practice
topic patient safety
human error
EBVM
url https://veterinaryevidence.org/index.php/ve/article/view/69
work_keys_str_mv AT markturner mistakeserrorsandfoulupspracticebasedevidenceforevidencebasedpractice