Developments in Agricultural Soil Quality and Health: Reflections by the Research Committee on Soil Organic Matter Management
The North Central Education and Research Activity Committee (NCERA-59) was formed in 1952 to address how soil organic matter formation and management practices affect soil structure and productivity. It is in this capacity that we comment on the science supporting soil quality and associated soil he...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-07-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00109/full |
| _version_ | 1811287876367810560 |
|---|---|
| author | Michelle M. Wander Larry J. Cihacek Mark Coyne Rhae A. Drijber Julie M. Grossman Jessica L. M. Gutknecht William R. Horwath Sindhu Jagadamma Daniel C. Olk Matt Ruark Sieglinde S. Snapp Lisa K. Tiemann Ray Weil Ronald F. Turco |
| author_facet | Michelle M. Wander Larry J. Cihacek Mark Coyne Rhae A. Drijber Julie M. Grossman Jessica L. M. Gutknecht William R. Horwath Sindhu Jagadamma Daniel C. Olk Matt Ruark Sieglinde S. Snapp Lisa K. Tiemann Ray Weil Ronald F. Turco |
| author_sort | Michelle M. Wander |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The North Central Education and Research Activity Committee (NCERA-59) was formed in 1952 to address how soil organic matter formation and management practices affect soil structure and productivity. It is in this capacity that we comment on the science supporting soil quality and associated soil health assessment for agricultural lands with the goal of hastening progress in this important field. Even though the suite of soil quality indicators being applied by U.S. soil health efforts closely mirrors the “minimum data set” we developed and recommended in the mid-1990s, we question whether the methods or means for their selection and development are sufficient to meet current and emerging soil health challenges. The rush to enshrine a standard suite of dated measures may be incompatible with longer-term goals. Legitimate study of soil health considers soil change accrued over years to decades that influence on- and off-site function. Tailoring of methods to local conditions is needed to effectively apply and interpret indicators for different soil resource regions and land uses. Adherence to a set suite of methods selected by subjective criteria should be avoided, particularly when we do not yet have adequate data or agreed upon interpretive frameworks for many so-called “Tier 1” biological indicators used in soil health assessment. While pooling data collected by producer-groups is one of the most exciting new trends in soil health, standardizing methods to meet broad inventory goals could compromise indicator use for site or application-specific problem solving. Changes in our nation's research landscape are shifting responsibility for soil stewardship from national and state government backed entities to public-private partnerships. As a result, it is critical to ensure that the data needed to assess soil health are generated by reproducible methods selected through a transparent process, and that data are readily available for public and private sector use. Appropriate methods for engagement need to be applied by public-private research partnerships as they establish and expand coordinated research enterprises that can deliver fact-based interpretation of soil quality indicators within the type of normative soil health framework conceived by USDA over 20 years ago. We look to existing examples as we consider how to put soil health information into the hands of practitioners in a manner that protects soils' services. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:26:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-52570065fc414819a22d8ed3ef7e086b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2296-665X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:26:10Z |
| publishDate | 2019-07-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Environmental Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-52570065fc414819a22d8ed3ef7e086b2022-12-22T03:04:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2019-07-01710.3389/fenvs.2019.00109459187Developments in Agricultural Soil Quality and Health: Reflections by the Research Committee on Soil Organic Matter ManagementMichelle M. Wander0Larry J. Cihacek1Mark Coyne2Rhae A. Drijber3Julie M. Grossman4Jessica L. M. Gutknecht5William R. Horwath6Sindhu Jagadamma7Daniel C. Olk8Matt Ruark9Sieglinde S. Snapp10Lisa K. Tiemann11Ray Weil12Ronald F. Turco13Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United StatesSoil Science Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United StatesPlant and Soil Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United StatesDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, United StatesDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United StatesDepartment of Soil, Water and Climate, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United StatesDepartment of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesBiosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United StatesUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA, United States0Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States1Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States1Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States2Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States3Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United StatesThe North Central Education and Research Activity Committee (NCERA-59) was formed in 1952 to address how soil organic matter formation and management practices affect soil structure and productivity. It is in this capacity that we comment on the science supporting soil quality and associated soil health assessment for agricultural lands with the goal of hastening progress in this important field. Even though the suite of soil quality indicators being applied by U.S. soil health efforts closely mirrors the “minimum data set” we developed and recommended in the mid-1990s, we question whether the methods or means for their selection and development are sufficient to meet current and emerging soil health challenges. The rush to enshrine a standard suite of dated measures may be incompatible with longer-term goals. Legitimate study of soil health considers soil change accrued over years to decades that influence on- and off-site function. Tailoring of methods to local conditions is needed to effectively apply and interpret indicators for different soil resource regions and land uses. Adherence to a set suite of methods selected by subjective criteria should be avoided, particularly when we do not yet have adequate data or agreed upon interpretive frameworks for many so-called “Tier 1” biological indicators used in soil health assessment. While pooling data collected by producer-groups is one of the most exciting new trends in soil health, standardizing methods to meet broad inventory goals could compromise indicator use for site or application-specific problem solving. Changes in our nation's research landscape are shifting responsibility for soil stewardship from national and state government backed entities to public-private partnerships. As a result, it is critical to ensure that the data needed to assess soil health are generated by reproducible methods selected through a transparent process, and that data are readily available for public and private sector use. Appropriate methods for engagement need to be applied by public-private research partnerships as they establish and expand coordinated research enterprises that can deliver fact-based interpretation of soil quality indicators within the type of normative soil health framework conceived by USDA over 20 years ago. We look to existing examples as we consider how to put soil health information into the hands of practitioners in a manner that protects soils' services.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00109/fullsoil qualitysoil healthsoil servicesindicatorsframeworkspublic-private partnerships (PPP) |
| spellingShingle | Michelle M. Wander Larry J. Cihacek Mark Coyne Rhae A. Drijber Julie M. Grossman Jessica L. M. Gutknecht William R. Horwath Sindhu Jagadamma Daniel C. Olk Matt Ruark Sieglinde S. Snapp Lisa K. Tiemann Ray Weil Ronald F. Turco Developments in Agricultural Soil Quality and Health: Reflections by the Research Committee on Soil Organic Matter Management Frontiers in Environmental Science soil quality soil health soil services indicators frameworks public-private partnerships (PPP) |
| title | Developments in Agricultural Soil Quality and Health: Reflections by the Research Committee on Soil Organic Matter Management |
| title_full | Developments in Agricultural Soil Quality and Health: Reflections by the Research Committee on Soil Organic Matter Management |
| title_fullStr | Developments in Agricultural Soil Quality and Health: Reflections by the Research Committee on Soil Organic Matter Management |
| title_full_unstemmed | Developments in Agricultural Soil Quality and Health: Reflections by the Research Committee on Soil Organic Matter Management |
| title_short | Developments in Agricultural Soil Quality and Health: Reflections by the Research Committee on Soil Organic Matter Management |
| title_sort | developments in agricultural soil quality and health reflections by the research committee on soil organic matter management |
| topic | soil quality soil health soil services indicators frameworks public-private partnerships (PPP) |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00109/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michellemwander developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT larryjcihacek developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT markcoyne developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT rhaeadrijber developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT juliemgrossman developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT jessicalmgutknecht developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT williamrhorwath developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT sindhujagadamma developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT danielcolk developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT mattruark developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT sieglindessnapp developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT lisaktiemann developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT rayweil developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement AT ronaldfturco developmentsinagriculturalsoilqualityandhealthreflectionsbytheresearchcommitteeonsoilorganicmattermanagement |