Grid refinement in ICON v2.6.4

<p>This article describes the implementation of grid refinement in the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) modeling system. It basically follows the classical two-way nesting approach known from widely used mesoscale models like MM5 or WRF, but it differs in the way feedback from fine grids to c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Zängl, D. Reinert, F. Prill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-09-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/7153/2022/gmd-15-7153-2022.pdf
_version_ 1811208857543770112
author G. Zängl
D. Reinert
F. Prill
author_facet G. Zängl
D. Reinert
F. Prill
author_sort G. Zängl
collection DOAJ
description <p>This article describes the implementation of grid refinement in the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) modeling system. It basically follows the classical two-way nesting approach known from widely used mesoscale models like MM5 or WRF, but it differs in the way feedback from fine grids to coarser grids is applied. Moreover, the ICON implementation supports vertical nesting in the sense that the upper boundary of a nested domain may be lower than that of its parent domain. Compared to the well-established implementations on quadrilateral grids, new methods had to be developed for interpolating the lateral boundary conditions from the parent domain to the child domain(s). These are based on radial basis functions (RBFs) and partly apply direct reconstruction of the prognostic variables at the required grid points, whereas gradient-based extrapolation from parent to child grid points is used in other cases. The runtime flow control is written such that limited-area domains can be processed identically to nested domains except for the lateral boundary data supply. To demonstrate the functionality and quality of the grid nesting in ICON, idealized tests based on the Jablonowski–Williamson test case <span class="cit" id="xref_paren.1">(<a href="#bib1.bibx18">Jablonowski and Williamson</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx18">2006</a>)</span> and the Schär mountain wave test case <span class="cit" id="xref_paren.2">(<a href="#bib1.bibx28">Schär et al.</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx28">2002</a>)</span> are presented. The results show that the numerical disturbances induced at the nest boundaries are small enough to be negligible for real applications. This is confirmed by experiments closely following the configuration used for operational numerical weather prediction at DWD, which demonstrate that a regional refinement over Europe has a significant positive impact on the forecast quality in the Northern Hemisphere.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T04:29:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5265e7de4bbd4a5383ae7fa3c7f6181a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T04:29:53Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Geoscientific Model Development
spelling doaj.art-5265e7de4bbd4a5383ae7fa3c7f6181a2022-12-22T03:47:58ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032022-09-01157153717610.5194/gmd-15-7153-2022Grid refinement in ICON v2.6.4G. ZänglD. ReinertF. Prill<p>This article describes the implementation of grid refinement in the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) modeling system. It basically follows the classical two-way nesting approach known from widely used mesoscale models like MM5 or WRF, but it differs in the way feedback from fine grids to coarser grids is applied. Moreover, the ICON implementation supports vertical nesting in the sense that the upper boundary of a nested domain may be lower than that of its parent domain. Compared to the well-established implementations on quadrilateral grids, new methods had to be developed for interpolating the lateral boundary conditions from the parent domain to the child domain(s). These are based on radial basis functions (RBFs) and partly apply direct reconstruction of the prognostic variables at the required grid points, whereas gradient-based extrapolation from parent to child grid points is used in other cases. The runtime flow control is written such that limited-area domains can be processed identically to nested domains except for the lateral boundary data supply. To demonstrate the functionality and quality of the grid nesting in ICON, idealized tests based on the Jablonowski–Williamson test case <span class="cit" id="xref_paren.1">(<a href="#bib1.bibx18">Jablonowski and Williamson</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx18">2006</a>)</span> and the Schär mountain wave test case <span class="cit" id="xref_paren.2">(<a href="#bib1.bibx28">Schär et al.</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx28">2002</a>)</span> are presented. The results show that the numerical disturbances induced at the nest boundaries are small enough to be negligible for real applications. This is confirmed by experiments closely following the configuration used for operational numerical weather prediction at DWD, which demonstrate that a regional refinement over Europe has a significant positive impact on the forecast quality in the Northern Hemisphere.</p>https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/7153/2022/gmd-15-7153-2022.pdf
spellingShingle G. Zängl
D. Reinert
F. Prill
Grid refinement in ICON v2.6.4
Geoscientific Model Development
title Grid refinement in ICON v2.6.4
title_full Grid refinement in ICON v2.6.4
title_fullStr Grid refinement in ICON v2.6.4
title_full_unstemmed Grid refinement in ICON v2.6.4
title_short Grid refinement in ICON v2.6.4
title_sort grid refinement in icon v2 6 4
url https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/7153/2022/gmd-15-7153-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gzangl gridrefinementiniconv264
AT dreinert gridrefinementiniconv264
AT fprill gridrefinementiniconv264