Peace, Prosperity and Safety Nets in Timor‐Leste: Competing Priorities or Complementary Investments?

Abstract Social protection cash transfers are a vital policy instrument in tackling poverty, and provide an affordable, broad‐based foundation for inclusive growth and social stability. Yet, international experience has shown that many countries have too many programs, but with coverage gaps and fra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pamela Dale, Lena Lepuschuetz, Nithin Umapathi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-05-01
Series:Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.25
_version_ 1819007009668726784
author Pamela Dale
Lena Lepuschuetz
Nithin Umapathi
author_facet Pamela Dale
Lena Lepuschuetz
Nithin Umapathi
author_sort Pamela Dale
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Social protection cash transfers are a vital policy instrument in tackling poverty, and provide an affordable, broad‐based foundation for inclusive growth and social stability. Yet, international experience has shown that many countries have too many programs, but with coverage gaps and fragmented benefits which leave significant proportions of the population without adequate poverty relief or improved economic security. Here, we examine the design and poverty impact of the primary cash transfer programs in the Democratic Republic of Timor‐Leste using nationally representative survey data. We find that though Timor‐Leste's level of social protection expenditure is high by international standards, the overall poverty impact is incommensurate with spending levels. This is explained by the proportion of expenditure devoted to transfers to veterans, the large proportion of the poor population which is not reached by the current targeting mechanisms, and the small coverage and benefit level of the only program that explicitly targets poor households.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T00:17:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-526c12c46d4740bcac9151cce0d8049b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-2680
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T00:17:46Z
publishDate 2014-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies
spelling doaj.art-526c12c46d4740bcac9151cce0d8049b2022-12-21T19:22:11ZengWileyAsia & the Pacific Policy Studies2050-26802014-05-011228729610.1002/app5.25Peace, Prosperity and Safety Nets in Timor‐Leste: Competing Priorities or Complementary Investments?Pamela Dale0Lena Lepuschuetz1Nithin Umapathi2Department of Social Protection for East Asia and Pacific World Bank Washington, DC 20043 USADepartment of Social Protection for East Asia and Pacific World Bank Washington, DC 20043 USADepartment of Social Protection for East Asia and Pacific World Bank Washington, DC 20043 USAAbstract Social protection cash transfers are a vital policy instrument in tackling poverty, and provide an affordable, broad‐based foundation for inclusive growth and social stability. Yet, international experience has shown that many countries have too many programs, but with coverage gaps and fragmented benefits which leave significant proportions of the population without adequate poverty relief or improved economic security. Here, we examine the design and poverty impact of the primary cash transfer programs in the Democratic Republic of Timor‐Leste using nationally representative survey data. We find that though Timor‐Leste's level of social protection expenditure is high by international standards, the overall poverty impact is incommensurate with spending levels. This is explained by the proportion of expenditure devoted to transfers to veterans, the large proportion of the poor population which is not reached by the current targeting mechanisms, and the small coverage and benefit level of the only program that explicitly targets poor households.https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.25safety netsTimor‐Lestepovertysocial pensionstargeting
spellingShingle Pamela Dale
Lena Lepuschuetz
Nithin Umapathi
Peace, Prosperity and Safety Nets in Timor‐Leste: Competing Priorities or Complementary Investments?
Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies
safety nets
Timor‐Leste
poverty
social pensions
targeting
title Peace, Prosperity and Safety Nets in Timor‐Leste: Competing Priorities or Complementary Investments?
title_full Peace, Prosperity and Safety Nets in Timor‐Leste: Competing Priorities or Complementary Investments?
title_fullStr Peace, Prosperity and Safety Nets in Timor‐Leste: Competing Priorities or Complementary Investments?
title_full_unstemmed Peace, Prosperity and Safety Nets in Timor‐Leste: Competing Priorities or Complementary Investments?
title_short Peace, Prosperity and Safety Nets in Timor‐Leste: Competing Priorities or Complementary Investments?
title_sort peace prosperity and safety nets in timor leste competing priorities or complementary investments
topic safety nets
Timor‐Leste
poverty
social pensions
targeting
url https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.25
work_keys_str_mv AT pameladale peaceprosperityandsafetynetsintimorlestecompetingprioritiesorcomplementaryinvestments
AT lenalepuschuetz peaceprosperityandsafetynetsintimorlestecompetingprioritiesorcomplementaryinvestments
AT nithinumapathi peaceprosperityandsafetynetsintimorlestecompetingprioritiesorcomplementaryinvestments