A comparison of grassland vegetation from three agri-environment conservation measures

Semi-natural grassland habitats have declined significantly throughout Europe. To halt the decline, grassland conservation measures have been included in most European agri-environment schemes. This is the first study to compare the botanical composition of grassland habitats managed under the Irish...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ó hUallacháin D., Finn J.A., Keogh B., Fritch R., Sheridan H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Compuscript Ltd 2016-12-01
Series:Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ijafr.2016.55.issue-2/ijafr-2016-0018/ijafr-2016-0018.xml?format=INT
_version_ 1797703849093365760
author Ó hUallacháin D.
Finn J.A.
Keogh B.
Fritch R.
Sheridan H.
author_facet Ó hUallacháin D.
Finn J.A.
Keogh B.
Fritch R.
Sheridan H.
author_sort Ó hUallacháin D.
collection DOAJ
description Semi-natural grassland habitats have declined significantly throughout Europe. To halt the decline, grassland conservation measures have been included in most European agri-environment schemes. This is the first study to compare the botanical composition of grassland habitats managed under the Irish Agri-Environment Options Scheme (AEOS). Sixty fields on drystock pastoral farms in receipt of agri-environment payments for grassland conservation were surveyed, with 20 fields being enrolled in each of the following AEOS options: Traditional Hay Meadow (THM), Species-Rich Grassland (SRG) and Natura 2000 species-rich grassland (Natura). The vegetation quality of sites enrolled in the Natura measure was higher than the quality of those enrolled in the THM and SRG measures. Natura sites had the greatest species richness, with a mean >40 species per site, which included approximately 17 species indicative of high botanical quality. Traditional Hay Meadows sites had the lowest species richness (mean: 29 species per site) and were dominated by species associated with improved grassland. Some THM sites had good levels of botanical richness and were similar in composition to Natura sites, with some Natura sites having lower vegetation quality, more similar to that of THM sites. Species-Rich Grassland had botanical richness that was intermediate between THM and Natura sites. A thorough assessment of the effectiveness of these measures was confounded by a lack of quantitative objectives for the target community composition to be attained. We discuss limitations and potential opportunities regarding the design, targeting, implementation and cost-effectiveness of these agri-environment measures.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T05:11:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-527dffefe51c4036b3ccd8a2f933fc2c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2009-9029
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T05:11:35Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Compuscript Ltd
record_format Article
series Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research
spelling doaj.art-527dffefe51c4036b3ccd8a2f933fc2c2023-09-03T08:36:56ZengCompuscript LtdIrish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research2009-90292016-12-0155217619110.1515/ijafr-2016-0018ijafr-2016-0018A comparison of grassland vegetation from three agri-environment conservation measuresÓ hUallacháin D.0Finn J.A.1Keogh B.2Fritch R.3Sheridan H.4 Teagasc, Environmental Research Centre, Johnstown Castle, County Wexford, Ireland Teagasc, Environmental Research Centre, Johnstown Castle, County Wexford, Ireland Teagasc, Environmental Research Centre, Johnstown Castle, County Wexford, Ireland School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, IrelandSemi-natural grassland habitats have declined significantly throughout Europe. To halt the decline, grassland conservation measures have been included in most European agri-environment schemes. This is the first study to compare the botanical composition of grassland habitats managed under the Irish Agri-Environment Options Scheme (AEOS). Sixty fields on drystock pastoral farms in receipt of agri-environment payments for grassland conservation were surveyed, with 20 fields being enrolled in each of the following AEOS options: Traditional Hay Meadow (THM), Species-Rich Grassland (SRG) and Natura 2000 species-rich grassland (Natura). The vegetation quality of sites enrolled in the Natura measure was higher than the quality of those enrolled in the THM and SRG measures. Natura sites had the greatest species richness, with a mean >40 species per site, which included approximately 17 species indicative of high botanical quality. Traditional Hay Meadows sites had the lowest species richness (mean: 29 species per site) and were dominated by species associated with improved grassland. Some THM sites had good levels of botanical richness and were similar in composition to Natura sites, with some Natura sites having lower vegetation quality, more similar to that of THM sites. Species-Rich Grassland had botanical richness that was intermediate between THM and Natura sites. A thorough assessment of the effectiveness of these measures was confounded by a lack of quantitative objectives for the target community composition to be attained. We discuss limitations and potential opportunities regarding the design, targeting, implementation and cost-effectiveness of these agri-environment measures.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ijafr.2016.55.issue-2/ijafr-2016-0018/ijafr-2016-0018.xml?format=INTagri-environment schemegrassland botanical diversitygrassland conservationhigh nature value farmlandsemi-natural grassland
spellingShingle Ó hUallacháin D.
Finn J.A.
Keogh B.
Fritch R.
Sheridan H.
A comparison of grassland vegetation from three agri-environment conservation measures
Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research
agri-environment scheme
grassland botanical diversity
grassland conservation
high nature value farmland
semi-natural grassland
title A comparison of grassland vegetation from three agri-environment conservation measures
title_full A comparison of grassland vegetation from three agri-environment conservation measures
title_fullStr A comparison of grassland vegetation from three agri-environment conservation measures
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of grassland vegetation from three agri-environment conservation measures
title_short A comparison of grassland vegetation from three agri-environment conservation measures
title_sort comparison of grassland vegetation from three agri environment conservation measures
topic agri-environment scheme
grassland botanical diversity
grassland conservation
high nature value farmland
semi-natural grassland
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ijafr.2016.55.issue-2/ijafr-2016-0018/ijafr-2016-0018.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT ohuallachaind acomparisonofgrasslandvegetationfromthreeagrienvironmentconservationmeasures
AT finnja acomparisonofgrasslandvegetationfromthreeagrienvironmentconservationmeasures
AT keoghb acomparisonofgrasslandvegetationfromthreeagrienvironmentconservationmeasures
AT fritchr acomparisonofgrasslandvegetationfromthreeagrienvironmentconservationmeasures
AT sheridanh acomparisonofgrasslandvegetationfromthreeagrienvironmentconservationmeasures
AT ohuallachaind comparisonofgrasslandvegetationfromthreeagrienvironmentconservationmeasures
AT finnja comparisonofgrasslandvegetationfromthreeagrienvironmentconservationmeasures
AT keoghb comparisonofgrasslandvegetationfromthreeagrienvironmentconservationmeasures
AT fritchr comparisonofgrasslandvegetationfromthreeagrienvironmentconservationmeasures
AT sheridanh comparisonofgrasslandvegetationfromthreeagrienvironmentconservationmeasures