Dalteparin versus vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal impairment: a Canadian pharmacoeconomic analysis

George Dranitsaris,1 Lesley G Shane,2 Mark Crowther,3 Guillaume Feugere,4 Seth Woodruff2 1Health Economic and Outcomes Research, Augmentium Pharma Consulting Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA; 3McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, 4Pfizer Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada Background:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dranitsaris G, Shane LG, Crowther M, Feugere G, Woodruff S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-01-01
Series:ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/dalteparin-versus-vitamin-k-antagonists-for-the-prevention-of-recurren-peer-reviewed-article-CEOR
_version_ 1818322471547305984
author Dranitsaris G
Shane LG
Crowther M
Feugere G
Woodruff S
author_facet Dranitsaris G
Shane LG
Crowther M
Feugere G
Woodruff S
author_sort Dranitsaris G
collection DOAJ
description George Dranitsaris,1 Lesley G Shane,2 Mark Crowther,3 Guillaume Feugere,4 Seth Woodruff2 1Health Economic and Outcomes Research, Augmentium Pharma Consulting Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA; 3McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, 4Pfizer Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada Background: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the risk is further elevated after a primary VTE. To reduce the risk of recurrent events, extended prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is available for use. However, in a large randomized trial (Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin versus Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer [CLOT]; Lee et al), extended duration dalteparin reduced the relative risk of recurrent VTE by 52% compared to VKA (p=0.002). A recent subgroup analysis of patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment also revealed lower absolute VTE rates with dalteparin (3% vs. 17%; p=0.011). To measure the economic value of dalteparin as an alternative to VKA, a patient-level cost utility analysis was conducted from a Canadian perspective. Methods: Resource use data captured during the CLOT trial were extracted and linked to 2015 Canadian unit cost estimates. Health state utilities were then measured using the Time-Trade-Off technique in 24 randomly selected members of the general Canadian public to estimate the gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results: For the entire CLOT trial population (n=676), the dalteparin group had significantly higher mean costs compared to the VKA group ($Can5,771 vs. $Can2,569; p<0.001). However, the utility assessment revealed that 21 of 24 respondents (88%) selected dalteparin over VKA, with an associated gain of 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.18) QALYs. When the incremental cost of dalteparin was combined with the QALY gain, dalteparin had a cost of $Can23,100 (95% CI: $Can19,200–$Can25,800) per QALY gained. The analysis in patients with renal impairment suggested even better economic value with the cost per QALY gained being <$14,000. Conclusion: Extended duration dalteparin is a cost-effective alternative to VKA for the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with cancer, especially in those with renal impairment. Keywords: venous thromboembolism, cancer, recurrence, low-molecular-weight heparin, dalteparin, vitamin K antagonists
first_indexed 2024-12-13T10:57:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5293a7ed342f490eb294c0a8c79b25ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-6981
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T10:57:20Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj.art-5293a7ed342f490eb294c0a8c79b25ca2022-12-21T23:49:27ZengDove Medical PressClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research1178-69812017-01-01Volume 9657330794Dalteparin versus vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal impairment: a Canadian pharmacoeconomic analysisDranitsaris GShane LGCrowther MFeugere GWoodruff SGeorge Dranitsaris,1 Lesley G Shane,2 Mark Crowther,3 Guillaume Feugere,4 Seth Woodruff2 1Health Economic and Outcomes Research, Augmentium Pharma Consulting Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA; 3McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, 4Pfizer Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada Background: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the risk is further elevated after a primary VTE. To reduce the risk of recurrent events, extended prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is available for use. However, in a large randomized trial (Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin versus Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer [CLOT]; Lee et al), extended duration dalteparin reduced the relative risk of recurrent VTE by 52% compared to VKA (p=0.002). A recent subgroup analysis of patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment also revealed lower absolute VTE rates with dalteparin (3% vs. 17%; p=0.011). To measure the economic value of dalteparin as an alternative to VKA, a patient-level cost utility analysis was conducted from a Canadian perspective. Methods: Resource use data captured during the CLOT trial were extracted and linked to 2015 Canadian unit cost estimates. Health state utilities were then measured using the Time-Trade-Off technique in 24 randomly selected members of the general Canadian public to estimate the gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results: For the entire CLOT trial population (n=676), the dalteparin group had significantly higher mean costs compared to the VKA group ($Can5,771 vs. $Can2,569; p<0.001). However, the utility assessment revealed that 21 of 24 respondents (88%) selected dalteparin over VKA, with an associated gain of 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.18) QALYs. When the incremental cost of dalteparin was combined with the QALY gain, dalteparin had a cost of $Can23,100 (95% CI: $Can19,200–$Can25,800) per QALY gained. The analysis in patients with renal impairment suggested even better economic value with the cost per QALY gained being <$14,000. Conclusion: Extended duration dalteparin is a cost-effective alternative to VKA for the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with cancer, especially in those with renal impairment. Keywords: venous thromboembolism, cancer, recurrence, low-molecular-weight heparin, dalteparin, vitamin K antagonistshttps://www.dovepress.com/dalteparin-versus-vitamin-k-antagonists-for-the-prevention-of-recurren-peer-reviewed-article-CEORVenous thromboembolismcancerrecurrencelow molecular weight heparindalteparinvitamin K antagonists
spellingShingle Dranitsaris G
Shane LG
Crowther M
Feugere G
Woodruff S
Dalteparin versus vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal impairment: a Canadian pharmacoeconomic analysis
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Venous thromboembolism
cancer
recurrence
low molecular weight heparin
dalteparin
vitamin K antagonists
title Dalteparin versus vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal impairment: a Canadian pharmacoeconomic analysis
title_full Dalteparin versus vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal impairment: a Canadian pharmacoeconomic analysis
title_fullStr Dalteparin versus vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal impairment: a Canadian pharmacoeconomic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Dalteparin versus vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal impairment: a Canadian pharmacoeconomic analysis
title_short Dalteparin versus vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal impairment: a Canadian pharmacoeconomic analysis
title_sort dalteparin versus vitamin k antagonists for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer and renal impairment a canadian pharmacoeconomic analysis
topic Venous thromboembolism
cancer
recurrence
low molecular weight heparin
dalteparin
vitamin K antagonists
url https://www.dovepress.com/dalteparin-versus-vitamin-k-antagonists-for-the-prevention-of-recurren-peer-reviewed-article-CEOR
work_keys_str_mv AT dranitsarisg dalteparinversusvitaminkantagonistsforthepreventionofrecurrentvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithcancerandrenalimpairmentacanadianpharmacoeconomicanalysis
AT shanelg dalteparinversusvitaminkantagonistsforthepreventionofrecurrentvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithcancerandrenalimpairmentacanadianpharmacoeconomicanalysis
AT crowtherm dalteparinversusvitaminkantagonistsforthepreventionofrecurrentvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithcancerandrenalimpairmentacanadianpharmacoeconomicanalysis
AT feugereg dalteparinversusvitaminkantagonistsforthepreventionofrecurrentvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithcancerandrenalimpairmentacanadianpharmacoeconomicanalysis
AT woodruffs dalteparinversusvitaminkantagonistsforthepreventionofrecurrentvenousthromboembolisminpatientswithcancerandrenalimpairmentacanadianpharmacoeconomicanalysis