Impact of age on hospital outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia

Abstract Background The real‐world data on the safety profile of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation among elderly patients is not well‐established. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes among those aged 18–64 years versus those aged ≥65 years who underwent catheter ablation of VT....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Choon Tan, Yong Hao Yeo, Qi Xuan Ang, Chrystina Kiwan, Olubadewa Fatunde, Justin Z. Lee, Aneesh Tolat, Dan Sorajja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-04-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12998
_version_ 1797221551811067904
author Min Choon Tan
Yong Hao Yeo
Qi Xuan Ang
Chrystina Kiwan
Olubadewa Fatunde
Justin Z. Lee
Aneesh Tolat
Dan Sorajja
author_facet Min Choon Tan
Yong Hao Yeo
Qi Xuan Ang
Chrystina Kiwan
Olubadewa Fatunde
Justin Z. Lee
Aneesh Tolat
Dan Sorajja
author_sort Min Choon Tan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The real‐world data on the safety profile of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation among elderly patients is not well‐established. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes among those aged 18–64 years versus those aged ≥65 years who underwent catheter ablation of VT. Method Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent VT catheter ablation between 2017 and 2020. We divided the patients into non‐elderly (18–64 years old) and elderly age groups (≥65 years old). We then analyzed the in‐hospital procedural outcome and 30‐day readmission between these two groups. Results Our study included 2075 (49.1%) non‐elderly patients and 2153 (50.9%) elderly patients who underwent VT ablation. Post‐procedurally, elderly patients had significantly higher rates of prolonged index hospitalization (≥7 days; 35.5% vs. 29.3%, p < .01), non‐home discharge (13.4% vs. 6.0%, p < .01), 30‐day readmission (17.0% vs. 11.4%, p < .01), and early mortality (5.5% vs. 2.4%, p < .01). There was no significant difference in the procedural complications between two groups, namely vascular complications, hemopericardium/cardiac tamponade, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), major bleeding requiring blood transfusion, and systemic embolization. Through multivariable analysis, the elderly group was associated with higher odds of early mortality (OR: 7.50; CI 1.86–30.31, p = .01), non‐home discharge (OR: 2.41; CI: 1.93–3.00, p < .01) and 30‐day readmission (OR: 1.58; CI 1.32–1.89, p < .01). Conclusion Elderly patients have worse in‐hospital outcome, early mortality, non‐home discharge, and 30‐day readmission following catheter ablation for VT. There was no significant difference between elderly and non‐elderly groups in the procedural complications.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:07:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-52947dfe915b4d34852b0ddef9ac105c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1880-4276
1883-2148
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:07:14Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Arrhythmia
spelling doaj.art-52947dfe915b4d34852b0ddef9ac105c2024-04-05T07:21:50ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42761883-21482024-04-0140231732410.1002/joa3.12998Impact of age on hospital outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardiaMin Choon Tan0Yong Hao Yeo1Qi Xuan Ang2Chrystina Kiwan3Olubadewa Fatunde4Justin Z. Lee5Aneesh Tolat6Dan Sorajja7Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USADepartment of Internal Medicine/Pediatrics William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak Michigan USADepartment of Internal Medicine Sparrow Health System and Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USADepartment of Internal Medicine New York Medical College at Saint Michael's Medical Center Newark New Jersey USADepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USADepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USADepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Hartford Healthcare/University of Connecticut Hartford Connecticut USADepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USAAbstract Background The real‐world data on the safety profile of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation among elderly patients is not well‐established. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes among those aged 18–64 years versus those aged ≥65 years who underwent catheter ablation of VT. Method Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent VT catheter ablation between 2017 and 2020. We divided the patients into non‐elderly (18–64 years old) and elderly age groups (≥65 years old). We then analyzed the in‐hospital procedural outcome and 30‐day readmission between these two groups. Results Our study included 2075 (49.1%) non‐elderly patients and 2153 (50.9%) elderly patients who underwent VT ablation. Post‐procedurally, elderly patients had significantly higher rates of prolonged index hospitalization (≥7 days; 35.5% vs. 29.3%, p < .01), non‐home discharge (13.4% vs. 6.0%, p < .01), 30‐day readmission (17.0% vs. 11.4%, p < .01), and early mortality (5.5% vs. 2.4%, p < .01). There was no significant difference in the procedural complications between two groups, namely vascular complications, hemopericardium/cardiac tamponade, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), major bleeding requiring blood transfusion, and systemic embolization. Through multivariable analysis, the elderly group was associated with higher odds of early mortality (OR: 7.50; CI 1.86–30.31, p = .01), non‐home discharge (OR: 2.41; CI: 1.93–3.00, p < .01) and 30‐day readmission (OR: 1.58; CI 1.32–1.89, p < .01). Conclusion Elderly patients have worse in‐hospital outcome, early mortality, non‐home discharge, and 30‐day readmission following catheter ablation for VT. There was no significant difference between elderly and non‐elderly groups in the procedural complications.https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12998adultcatheter ablationelderlyhospital outcomeventricular tachycardia
spellingShingle Min Choon Tan
Yong Hao Yeo
Qi Xuan Ang
Chrystina Kiwan
Olubadewa Fatunde
Justin Z. Lee
Aneesh Tolat
Dan Sorajja
Impact of age on hospital outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia
Journal of Arrhythmia
adult
catheter ablation
elderly
hospital outcome
ventricular tachycardia
title Impact of age on hospital outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia
title_full Impact of age on hospital outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia
title_fullStr Impact of age on hospital outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia
title_full_unstemmed Impact of age on hospital outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia
title_short Impact of age on hospital outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia
title_sort impact of age on hospital outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia
topic adult
catheter ablation
elderly
hospital outcome
ventricular tachycardia
url https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12998
work_keys_str_mv AT minchoontan impactofageonhospitaloutcomesaftercatheterablationforventriculartachycardia
AT yonghaoyeo impactofageonhospitaloutcomesaftercatheterablationforventriculartachycardia
AT qixuanang impactofageonhospitaloutcomesaftercatheterablationforventriculartachycardia
AT chrystinakiwan impactofageonhospitaloutcomesaftercatheterablationforventriculartachycardia
AT olubadewafatunde impactofageonhospitaloutcomesaftercatheterablationforventriculartachycardia
AT justinzlee impactofageonhospitaloutcomesaftercatheterablationforventriculartachycardia
AT aneeshtolat impactofageonhospitaloutcomesaftercatheterablationforventriculartachycardia
AT dansorajja impactofageonhospitaloutcomesaftercatheterablationforventriculartachycardia