Dworkin, la controversia sobre el aborto y el hambre global

This essay relates the struggle to eradicate world hunger to the battle over abortion. It criticize the Dworkin's defense of the legality of abortion, by presenting arguments so that those in both sides of the abortion debate (pro-election and pro-life) spend their time and resources in the fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Pogge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Caldas 2006-12-01
Series:Jurídicas
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/7027
_version_ 1797399282618204160
author Thomas Pogge
author_facet Thomas Pogge
author_sort Thomas Pogge
collection DOAJ
description This essay relates the struggle to eradicate world hunger to the battle over abortion. It criticize the Dworkin's defense of the legality of abortion, by presenting arguments so that those in both sides of the abortion debate (pro-election and pro-life) spend their time and resources in the fight against world hunger instead of the abortion battle, in which both sides could work together. In the fight over whether and to what extent abortions should be legal, great expenditures of effort are merely neutralizing each other. Meanwhile, fighting world hunger is much less wasteful, and less costly for civil harmony and for the position of morality in our culture. Various counter-arguments — invoking cost-effectiveness considerations, or the distinctions between doing and letting happen or between compatriots and foreigners— can be refuted.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:37:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-52a17e08f77a435c860ccc1178b381f1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1794-2918
2590-8928
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:37:06Z
publishDate 2006-12-01
publisher Universidad de Caldas
record_format Article
series Jurídicas
spelling doaj.art-52a17e08f77a435c860ccc1178b381f12023-12-08T22:27:22ZengUniversidad de CaldasJurídicas1794-29182590-89282006-12-0132Dworkin, la controversia sobre el aborto y el hambre globalThomas Pogge0Australian National University This essay relates the struggle to eradicate world hunger to the battle over abortion. It criticize the Dworkin's defense of the legality of abortion, by presenting arguments so that those in both sides of the abortion debate (pro-election and pro-life) spend their time and resources in the fight against world hunger instead of the abortion battle, in which both sides could work together. In the fight over whether and to what extent abortions should be legal, great expenditures of effort are merely neutralizing each other. Meanwhile, fighting world hunger is much less wasteful, and less costly for civil harmony and for the position of morality in our culture. Various counter-arguments — invoking cost-effectiveness considerations, or the distinctions between doing and letting happen or between compatriots and foreigners— can be refuted. https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/7027AbortionDworkinglobal hungermoral prioritiescivil harmony
spellingShingle Thomas Pogge
Dworkin, la controversia sobre el aborto y el hambre global
Jurídicas
Abortion
Dworkin
global hunger
moral priorities
civil harmony
title Dworkin, la controversia sobre el aborto y el hambre global
title_full Dworkin, la controversia sobre el aborto y el hambre global
title_fullStr Dworkin, la controversia sobre el aborto y el hambre global
title_full_unstemmed Dworkin, la controversia sobre el aborto y el hambre global
title_short Dworkin, la controversia sobre el aborto y el hambre global
title_sort dworkin la controversia sobre el aborto y el hambre global
topic Abortion
Dworkin
global hunger
moral priorities
civil harmony
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/7027
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaspogge dworkinlacontroversiasobreelabortoyelhambreglobal