New Paleointensity Data From Aniakchak Volcano, Alaska, USA

Abstract This study presents the first set of Holocene, high‐quality absolute paleointensity data from Alaska, USA. Existing paleointensity data for the Holocene are generally located at mid‐northern latitudes in North America, Europe, the Middle East, and eastern Asia. Relatively few data are from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Geoffrey Cromwell, Yiming Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-12-01
Series:Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GC010032
_version_ 1797637939578011648
author Geoffrey Cromwell
Yiming Zhang
author_facet Geoffrey Cromwell
Yiming Zhang
author_sort Geoffrey Cromwell
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study presents the first set of Holocene, high‐quality absolute paleointensity data from Alaska, USA. Existing paleointensity data for the Holocene are generally located at mid‐northern latitudes in North America, Europe, the Middle East, and eastern Asia. Relatively few data are from the Alaska region. IZZI‐modified paleointensity experiments were conducted on glassy volcanic materials from Aniakchak volcano, a mid‐ to high‐latitude composite volcano on the Alaska‐Aleutian arc. The CCRIT selection criteria were applied to the paleointensity results. A total of 30 specimens from six samples with estimated ages ranging from 1931 CE to 2,300 years before present passed all selection criteria. The sample‐mean paleointensities ranged from 49.5 to 68.0 microTesla (μT). The sample‐mean paleointensity results are comparable to modeled intensities, however all except for one sample‐mean paleointensity are lower than those predicted by geomagnetic field models. The paleointensity estimate for the historical 1931 CE eruption was about 15 μT greater than the expected field strength. This overestimate may result from unrecognized alteration or non‐ideal remanence carriers in this sample. Further evaluation of samples from the 1931 CE eruption using a Bayesian estimation method resulted in a paleointensity estimate that encompasses the historical field strength within uncertainty. These new paleointensity results are a valuable contribution to the mid‐ to high‐northern latitude paleomagnetic data set. Incorporation of these data into future geomagnetic field models will improve the predictions of geomagnetic field behavior in the Alaska region.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:56:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-52afc25d0d96474a905e07d429cbb625
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1525-2027
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:56:22Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
spelling doaj.art-52afc25d0d96474a905e07d429cbb6252023-11-03T17:00:43ZengWileyGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems1525-20272021-12-012212n/an/a10.1029/2021GC010032New Paleointensity Data From Aniakchak Volcano, Alaska, USAGeoffrey Cromwell0Yiming Zhang1Occidental College Los Angeles CA USAOccidental College Los Angeles CA USAAbstract This study presents the first set of Holocene, high‐quality absolute paleointensity data from Alaska, USA. Existing paleointensity data for the Holocene are generally located at mid‐northern latitudes in North America, Europe, the Middle East, and eastern Asia. Relatively few data are from the Alaska region. IZZI‐modified paleointensity experiments were conducted on glassy volcanic materials from Aniakchak volcano, a mid‐ to high‐latitude composite volcano on the Alaska‐Aleutian arc. The CCRIT selection criteria were applied to the paleointensity results. A total of 30 specimens from six samples with estimated ages ranging from 1931 CE to 2,300 years before present passed all selection criteria. The sample‐mean paleointensities ranged from 49.5 to 68.0 microTesla (μT). The sample‐mean paleointensity results are comparable to modeled intensities, however all except for one sample‐mean paleointensity are lower than those predicted by geomagnetic field models. The paleointensity estimate for the historical 1931 CE eruption was about 15 μT greater than the expected field strength. This overestimate may result from unrecognized alteration or non‐ideal remanence carriers in this sample. Further evaluation of samples from the 1931 CE eruption using a Bayesian estimation method resulted in a paleointensity estimate that encompasses the historical field strength within uncertainty. These new paleointensity results are a valuable contribution to the mid‐ to high‐northern latitude paleomagnetic data set. Incorporation of these data into future geomagnetic field models will improve the predictions of geomagnetic field behavior in the Alaska region.https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GC010032paleointensityAlaskaCCRITpaleomagnetism
spellingShingle Geoffrey Cromwell
Yiming Zhang
New Paleointensity Data From Aniakchak Volcano, Alaska, USA
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
paleointensity
Alaska
CCRIT
paleomagnetism
title New Paleointensity Data From Aniakchak Volcano, Alaska, USA
title_full New Paleointensity Data From Aniakchak Volcano, Alaska, USA
title_fullStr New Paleointensity Data From Aniakchak Volcano, Alaska, USA
title_full_unstemmed New Paleointensity Data From Aniakchak Volcano, Alaska, USA
title_short New Paleointensity Data From Aniakchak Volcano, Alaska, USA
title_sort new paleointensity data from aniakchak volcano alaska usa
topic paleointensity
Alaska
CCRIT
paleomagnetism
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GC010032
work_keys_str_mv AT geoffreycromwell newpaleointensitydatafromaniakchakvolcanoalaskausa
AT yimingzhang newpaleointensitydatafromaniakchakvolcanoalaskausa