The influence of 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiology of olive seedlings
Abstract The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of herbicides 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiological response of chlorophyll a in olive (Olea europaea) seedlings. The following eight rates of the 2,4 D (670 g a.e. ha-1) and dicamba (720 g a.e. ha-1) herbicides were applied: 0, 1.56...
Үндсэн зохиолчид: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Формат: | Өгүүллэг |
Хэл сонгох: | English |
Хэвлэсэн: |
Embrapa Informação Tecnológica
2024-09-01
|
Цуврал: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
Нөхцлүүд: | |
Онлайн хандалт: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2024000104304&lng=en&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1827128250396049408 |
---|---|
author | Jaine Rubert Iuri Somavilla Eduard Leichtweiss Roberto Avila Neto Rosana Thomasi Camila Tarouco Alvaro Berghetti Fernando Nicoloso André Ulguim |
author_facet | Jaine Rubert Iuri Somavilla Eduard Leichtweiss Roberto Avila Neto Rosana Thomasi Camila Tarouco Alvaro Berghetti Fernando Nicoloso André Ulguim |
author_sort | Jaine Rubert |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of herbicides 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiological response of chlorophyll a in olive (Olea europaea) seedlings. The following eight rates of the 2,4 D (670 g a.e. ha-1) and dicamba (720 g a.e. ha-1) herbicides were applied: 0, 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12, 25, 50, and 100% of the recommended for burndown. The herbicides were applied at 80 cm above the seedlings using a CO2 pressurized back sprayer with a 150 L ha-1 spray volume. Plant gas exchange was measured using a portable infrared gas analyzer. Chlorophyll a fluorescence was evaluated using a portable modulated light fluorometer. The application of both herbicides caused a decrease in the process of CO2 assimilation in the plants, reducing net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. The 2,4-D herbicide caused the most severe effects on the variables related to chlorophyll a fluorescence. Low values of maximum quantic yield were observed after the application of the herbicides, of which dicamba was the most harmful. Both herbicides damage the photosynthetic apparatus of olive seedlings. |
first_indexed | 2025-03-20T15:41:25Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-52b51b34e07d4b879a23c89d440fba6d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1678-3921 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2025-03-20T15:41:25Z |
publishDate | 2024-09-01 |
publisher | Embrapa Informação Tecnológica |
record_format | Article |
series | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
spelling | doaj.art-52b51b34e07d4b879a23c89d440fba6d2024-09-03T07:44:12ZengEmbrapa Informação TecnológicaPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira1678-39212024-09-015910.1590/s1678-3921.pab2024.v59.03233The influence of 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiology of olive seedlingsJaine Ruberthttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2790-7318Iuri Somavillahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5056-5104Eduard Leichtweisshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-8904Roberto Avila Netohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6003-0998Rosana Thomasihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9248-0213Camila Taroucohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9488-9773Alvaro Berghettihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8020-3200Fernando Nicolosohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7900-5263André Ulguimhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-4670Abstract The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of herbicides 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiological response of chlorophyll a in olive (Olea europaea) seedlings. The following eight rates of the 2,4 D (670 g a.e. ha-1) and dicamba (720 g a.e. ha-1) herbicides were applied: 0, 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12, 25, 50, and 100% of the recommended for burndown. The herbicides were applied at 80 cm above the seedlings using a CO2 pressurized back sprayer with a 150 L ha-1 spray volume. Plant gas exchange was measured using a portable infrared gas analyzer. Chlorophyll a fluorescence was evaluated using a portable modulated light fluorometer. The application of both herbicides caused a decrease in the process of CO2 assimilation in the plants, reducing net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. The 2,4-D herbicide caused the most severe effects on the variables related to chlorophyll a fluorescence. Low values of maximum quantic yield were observed after the application of the herbicides, of which dicamba was the most harmful. Both herbicides damage the photosynthetic apparatus of olive seedlings.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2024000104304&lng=en&tlng=enOlea europaeaconductanceherbicidenet photosynthesis |
spellingShingle | Jaine Rubert Iuri Somavilla Eduard Leichtweiss Roberto Avila Neto Rosana Thomasi Camila Tarouco Alvaro Berghetti Fernando Nicoloso André Ulguim The influence of 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiology of olive seedlings Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Olea europaea conductance herbicide net photosynthesis |
title | The influence of 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiology of olive seedlings |
title_full | The influence of 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiology of olive seedlings |
title_fullStr | The influence of 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiology of olive seedlings |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiology of olive seedlings |
title_short | The influence of 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiology of olive seedlings |
title_sort | influence of 2 4 d and dicamba on the physiology of olive seedlings |
topic | Olea europaea conductance herbicide net photosynthesis |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2024000104304&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jainerubert theinfluenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT iurisomavilla theinfluenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT eduardleichtweiss theinfluenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT robertoavilaneto theinfluenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT rosanathomasi theinfluenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT camilatarouco theinfluenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT alvaroberghetti theinfluenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT fernandonicoloso theinfluenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT andreulguim theinfluenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT jainerubert influenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT iurisomavilla influenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT eduardleichtweiss influenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT robertoavilaneto influenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT rosanathomasi influenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT camilatarouco influenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT alvaroberghetti influenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT fernandonicoloso influenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings AT andreulguim influenceof24danddicambaonthephysiologyofoliveseedlings |