Errors and Misconceptions in Euclidean Geometry Problem Solving Questions: The Case of Grade 12 Learners

Euclidean geometry provides an opportunity for learners to learn argumentation and develop inductive and deductive reasoning. Despite the significance of Euclidean geometry for developing these skills, learner performance in mathematics, particularly geometry, remains a concern in many countries. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moeketsi Mosia, Mogalatjane Edward Matabane, Tshele John Moloi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: OpenED Network 2023-08-01
Series:Research in Social Sciences and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/677
_version_ 1797744194561769472
author Moeketsi Mosia
Mogalatjane Edward Matabane
Tshele John Moloi
author_facet Moeketsi Mosia
Mogalatjane Edward Matabane
Tshele John Moloi
author_sort Moeketsi Mosia
collection DOAJ
description Euclidean geometry provides an opportunity for learners to learn argumentation and develop inductive and deductive reasoning. Despite the significance of Euclidean geometry for developing these skills, learner performance in mathematics, particularly geometry, remains a concern in many countries. Thus, the current study examined the nature of learners’ errors in Euclidean geometry problem-solving, particularly regarding the theorem for angle at the centre and its applications. Van Heile’s theory of geometric thinking and teacher knowledge of error analysis were used as conceptual frameworks to make sense of the nature of learners’ errors and misconceptions. Using a participatory action research approach, the study was operationalised by five mathematics teachers from four secondary schools in Motheo district in the Free State Province of South Africa and three academics from two local universities. The study analysed 50 sampled midyear examination scripts of Grade 12 learners from four schools. The findings of this study revealed that most learner errors resulted from concepts on Van Heile’s operating Levels 0 and 1, while the questions mainly required Level 3 thinking. The study recommends that teachers determine their learners’ level of geometric thinking and integrate this knowledge in their lesson preparations and material development. 
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:06:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-52bab7e88174429d96b2d6bc2bb5b0d9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2468-6891
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:06:14Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher OpenED Network
record_format Article
series Research in Social Sciences and Technology
spelling doaj.art-52bab7e88174429d96b2d6bc2bb5b0d92023-08-12T13:55:10ZengOpenED NetworkResearch in Social Sciences and Technology2468-68912023-08-018310.46303/ressat.2023.23Errors and Misconceptions in Euclidean Geometry Problem Solving Questions: The Case of Grade 12 LearnersMoeketsi Mosia0Mogalatjane Edward Matabane1Tshele John Moloi2Centre for Teaching, Learning and Programme Development, Sol Plaatje University, Kimberley, South AftricaSchool of Education. Sol Plaatje University, Kimberley, South AfricaSchool of Education, Northwest University, Potchesfstrooom, South Africa Euclidean geometry provides an opportunity for learners to learn argumentation and develop inductive and deductive reasoning. Despite the significance of Euclidean geometry for developing these skills, learner performance in mathematics, particularly geometry, remains a concern in many countries. Thus, the current study examined the nature of learners’ errors in Euclidean geometry problem-solving, particularly regarding the theorem for angle at the centre and its applications. Van Heile’s theory of geometric thinking and teacher knowledge of error analysis were used as conceptual frameworks to make sense of the nature of learners’ errors and misconceptions. Using a participatory action research approach, the study was operationalised by five mathematics teachers from four secondary schools in Motheo district in the Free State Province of South Africa and three academics from two local universities. The study analysed 50 sampled midyear examination scripts of Grade 12 learners from four schools. The findings of this study revealed that most learner errors resulted from concepts on Van Heile’s operating Levels 0 and 1, while the questions mainly required Level 3 thinking. The study recommends that teachers determine their learners’ level of geometric thinking and integrate this knowledge in their lesson preparations and material development.  https://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/677Euclidean geometrygeometrygeometric thinkingerrorsVan Heile`s theory
spellingShingle Moeketsi Mosia
Mogalatjane Edward Matabane
Tshele John Moloi
Errors and Misconceptions in Euclidean Geometry Problem Solving Questions: The Case of Grade 12 Learners
Research in Social Sciences and Technology
Euclidean geometry
geometry
geometric thinking
errors
Van Heile`s theory
title Errors and Misconceptions in Euclidean Geometry Problem Solving Questions: The Case of Grade 12 Learners
title_full Errors and Misconceptions in Euclidean Geometry Problem Solving Questions: The Case of Grade 12 Learners
title_fullStr Errors and Misconceptions in Euclidean Geometry Problem Solving Questions: The Case of Grade 12 Learners
title_full_unstemmed Errors and Misconceptions in Euclidean Geometry Problem Solving Questions: The Case of Grade 12 Learners
title_short Errors and Misconceptions in Euclidean Geometry Problem Solving Questions: The Case of Grade 12 Learners
title_sort errors and misconceptions in euclidean geometry problem solving questions the case of grade 12 learners
topic Euclidean geometry
geometry
geometric thinking
errors
Van Heile`s theory
url https://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/677
work_keys_str_mv AT moeketsimosia errorsandmisconceptionsineuclideangeometryproblemsolvingquestionsthecaseofgrade12learners
AT mogalatjaneedwardmatabane errorsandmisconceptionsineuclideangeometryproblemsolvingquestionsthecaseofgrade12learners
AT tshelejohnmoloi errorsandmisconceptionsineuclideangeometryproblemsolvingquestionsthecaseofgrade12learners