“Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 Literature

Medical practitioners and healthcare workers rely on information accuracy in academic journals. Some Covid-19 papers contain “tortured phrases”, nonstandard English expressions, or imprecise or erroneous terms, that give the impression of jargon but are not. Most post-publication attention paid to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2023-08-01
Series:Philosophy of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://philmed.pitt.edu/philmed/article/view/164
_version_ 1797755347533824000
author Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
author_facet Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
author_sort Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
collection DOAJ
description Medical practitioners and healthcare workers rely on information accuracy in academic journals. Some Covid-19 papers contain “tortured phrases”, nonstandard English expressions, or imprecise or erroneous terms, that give the impression of jargon but are not. Most post-publication attention paid to Covid-19 literature has focused on the accuracy of biomedical aspects, the validity of claims, or the robustness of data, but little has been published on linguistic specificity. This paper highlights the existence of “tortured phrases” in select Covid-19 literature, arguing that they could serve as a class of epistemic marker when evaluating the integrity of the scientific and biomedical literature.  
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:46:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-52c05df92aaf4760b2ab8b08dd230561
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2692-3963
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T17:46:30Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
record_format Article
series Philosophy of Medicine
spelling doaj.art-52c05df92aaf4760b2ab8b08dd2305612023-08-03T16:25:08ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghPhilosophy of Medicine2692-39632023-08-014110.5195/pom.2023.164“Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 LiteratureJaime A. Teixeira da Silva0Independent researcher, Ikenobe, Kagawa-ken Medical practitioners and healthcare workers rely on information accuracy in academic journals. Some Covid-19 papers contain “tortured phrases”, nonstandard English expressions, or imprecise or erroneous terms, that give the impression of jargon but are not. Most post-publication attention paid to Covid-19 literature has focused on the accuracy of biomedical aspects, the validity of claims, or the robustness of data, but little has been published on linguistic specificity. This paper highlights the existence of “tortured phrases” in select Covid-19 literature, arguing that they could serve as a class of epistemic marker when evaluating the integrity of the scientific and biomedical literature.   https://philmed.pitt.edu/philmed/article/view/164DeontologyEditorial oversightEthicsFailed peer reviewNature of scienceNonsense text
spellingShingle Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
“Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 Literature
Philosophy of Medicine
Deontology
Editorial oversight
Ethics
Failed peer review
Nature of science
Nonsense text
title “Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 Literature
title_full “Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 Literature
title_fullStr “Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 Literature
title_full_unstemmed “Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 Literature
title_short “Tortured Phrases” in Covid-19 Literature
title_sort tortured phrases in covid 19 literature
topic Deontology
Editorial oversight
Ethics
Failed peer review
Nature of science
Nonsense text
url https://philmed.pitt.edu/philmed/article/view/164
work_keys_str_mv AT jaimeateixeiradasilva torturedphrasesincovid19literature