"Saying no is no easy matter" A qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The general practitioner in Norway is expected to ensure equity and effectiveness through fair rationing. At the same time, due to recent reforms of the Norwegian health care sector, both the role of economic incentives and patient a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Norheim Ole, Carlsen Benedicte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-11-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/5/70
_version_ 1818779114545348608
author Norheim Ole
Carlsen Benedicte
author_facet Norheim Ole
Carlsen Benedicte
author_sort Norheim Ole
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The general practitioner in Norway is expected to ensure equity and effectiveness through fair rationing. At the same time, due to recent reforms of the Norwegian health care sector, both the role of economic incentives and patient autonomy have been strengthened. Studies indicate that modern general practitioners, both in Norway and in other countries are uncomfortable with the gatekeeper role, but there is little knowledge about how general practitioners experience rationing in practice.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Through focus group interviews with Norwegian general practitioners, we explore physicians' attitudes toward factors of influence on medical decision making and how rationing dilemmas are experienced in everyday practice.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Four major concerns appeared in the group discussions: The obligation to ration health care, professional autonomy, patient autonomy, and competition. A central finding was that the physicians find rationing difficult because saying no in face to face relations often is felt uncomfortable and in conflict with other important objectives for the general practitioner.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is important to understand the association between using economic incentives in the management of health care, increasing patient autonomy, and the willingness among physicians to contribute to efficient, fair and legitimate resource allocation.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-18T11:55:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-52dd5bb4b0a64a1ca4f3fe3a4a5917ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T11:55:28Z
publishDate 2005-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-52dd5bb4b0a64a1ca4f3fe3a4a5917ba2022-12-21T21:09:05ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632005-11-01517010.1186/1472-6963-5-70"Saying no is no easy matter" A qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practiceNorheim OleCarlsen Benedicte<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The general practitioner in Norway is expected to ensure equity and effectiveness through fair rationing. At the same time, due to recent reforms of the Norwegian health care sector, both the role of economic incentives and patient autonomy have been strengthened. Studies indicate that modern general practitioners, both in Norway and in other countries are uncomfortable with the gatekeeper role, but there is little knowledge about how general practitioners experience rationing in practice.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Through focus group interviews with Norwegian general practitioners, we explore physicians' attitudes toward factors of influence on medical decision making and how rationing dilemmas are experienced in everyday practice.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Four major concerns appeared in the group discussions: The obligation to ration health care, professional autonomy, patient autonomy, and competition. A central finding was that the physicians find rationing difficult because saying no in face to face relations often is felt uncomfortable and in conflict with other important objectives for the general practitioner.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is important to understand the association between using economic incentives in the management of health care, increasing patient autonomy, and the willingness among physicians to contribute to efficient, fair and legitimate resource allocation.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/5/70
spellingShingle Norheim Ole
Carlsen Benedicte
"Saying no is no easy matter" A qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice
BMC Health Services Research
title "Saying no is no easy matter" A qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice
title_full "Saying no is no easy matter" A qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice
title_fullStr "Saying no is no easy matter" A qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice
title_full_unstemmed "Saying no is no easy matter" A qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice
title_short "Saying no is no easy matter" A qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice
title_sort saying no is no easy matter a qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/5/70
work_keys_str_mv AT norheimole sayingnoisnoeasymatteraqualitativestudyofcompetingconcernsinrationingdecisionsingeneralpractice
AT carlsenbenedicte sayingnoisnoeasymatteraqualitativestudyofcompetingconcernsinrationingdecisionsingeneralpractice