Does AlphaFold2 model proteins’ intracellular conformations? An experimental test using cross-linking mass spectrometry of endogenous ciliary proteins

Abstract A major goal in structural biology is to understand protein assemblies in their biologically relevant states. Here, we investigate whether AlphaFold2 structure predictions match native protein conformations. We chemically cross-linked proteins in situ within intact Tetrahymena thermophila c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caitlyn L. McCafferty, Erin L. Pennington, Ophelia Papoulas, David W. Taylor, Edward M. Marcotte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-04-01
Series:Communications Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04773-7
_version_ 1797845808620503040
author Caitlyn L. McCafferty
Erin L. Pennington
Ophelia Papoulas
David W. Taylor
Edward M. Marcotte
author_facet Caitlyn L. McCafferty
Erin L. Pennington
Ophelia Papoulas
David W. Taylor
Edward M. Marcotte
author_sort Caitlyn L. McCafferty
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A major goal in structural biology is to understand protein assemblies in their biologically relevant states. Here, we investigate whether AlphaFold2 structure predictions match native protein conformations. We chemically cross-linked proteins in situ within intact Tetrahymena thermophila cilia and native ciliary extracts, identifying 1,225 intramolecular cross-links within the 100 best-sampled proteins, providing a benchmark of distance restraints obeyed by proteins in their native assemblies. The corresponding structure predictions were highly concordant, positioning 86.2% of cross-linked residues within Cɑ-to-Cɑ distances of 30 Å, consistent with the cross-linker length. 43% of proteins showed no violations. Most inconsistencies occurred in low-confidence regions or between domains. Overall, AlphaFold2 predictions with lower predicted aligned error corresponded to more correct native structures. However, we observe cases where rigid body domains are oriented incorrectly, as for ciliary protein BBC118, suggesting that combining structure prediction with experimental information will better reveal biologically relevant conformations.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:44:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-52df4cef827346098d028bcb11deb9a7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2399-3642
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:44:56Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Communications Biology
spelling doaj.art-52df4cef827346098d028bcb11deb9a72023-04-16T11:22:27ZengNature PortfolioCommunications Biology2399-36422023-04-016111010.1038/s42003-023-04773-7Does AlphaFold2 model proteins’ intracellular conformations? An experimental test using cross-linking mass spectrometry of endogenous ciliary proteinsCaitlyn L. McCafferty0Erin L. Pennington1Ophelia Papoulas2David W. Taylor3Edward M. Marcotte4Department of Molecular Biosciences, Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of TexasDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of TexasDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of TexasDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of TexasDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of TexasAbstract A major goal in structural biology is to understand protein assemblies in their biologically relevant states. Here, we investigate whether AlphaFold2 structure predictions match native protein conformations. We chemically cross-linked proteins in situ within intact Tetrahymena thermophila cilia and native ciliary extracts, identifying 1,225 intramolecular cross-links within the 100 best-sampled proteins, providing a benchmark of distance restraints obeyed by proteins in their native assemblies. The corresponding structure predictions were highly concordant, positioning 86.2% of cross-linked residues within Cɑ-to-Cɑ distances of 30 Å, consistent with the cross-linker length. 43% of proteins showed no violations. Most inconsistencies occurred in low-confidence regions or between domains. Overall, AlphaFold2 predictions with lower predicted aligned error corresponded to more correct native structures. However, we observe cases where rigid body domains are oriented incorrectly, as for ciliary protein BBC118, suggesting that combining structure prediction with experimental information will better reveal biologically relevant conformations.https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04773-7
spellingShingle Caitlyn L. McCafferty
Erin L. Pennington
Ophelia Papoulas
David W. Taylor
Edward M. Marcotte
Does AlphaFold2 model proteins’ intracellular conformations? An experimental test using cross-linking mass spectrometry of endogenous ciliary proteins
Communications Biology
title Does AlphaFold2 model proteins’ intracellular conformations? An experimental test using cross-linking mass spectrometry of endogenous ciliary proteins
title_full Does AlphaFold2 model proteins’ intracellular conformations? An experimental test using cross-linking mass spectrometry of endogenous ciliary proteins
title_fullStr Does AlphaFold2 model proteins’ intracellular conformations? An experimental test using cross-linking mass spectrometry of endogenous ciliary proteins
title_full_unstemmed Does AlphaFold2 model proteins’ intracellular conformations? An experimental test using cross-linking mass spectrometry of endogenous ciliary proteins
title_short Does AlphaFold2 model proteins’ intracellular conformations? An experimental test using cross-linking mass spectrometry of endogenous ciliary proteins
title_sort does alphafold2 model proteins intracellular conformations an experimental test using cross linking mass spectrometry of endogenous ciliary proteins
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04773-7
work_keys_str_mv AT caitlynlmccafferty doesalphafold2modelproteinsintracellularconformationsanexperimentaltestusingcrosslinkingmassspectrometryofendogenousciliaryproteins
AT erinlpennington doesalphafold2modelproteinsintracellularconformationsanexperimentaltestusingcrosslinkingmassspectrometryofendogenousciliaryproteins
AT opheliapapoulas doesalphafold2modelproteinsintracellularconformationsanexperimentaltestusingcrosslinkingmassspectrometryofendogenousciliaryproteins
AT davidwtaylor doesalphafold2modelproteinsintracellularconformationsanexperimentaltestusingcrosslinkingmassspectrometryofendogenousciliaryproteins
AT edwardmmarcotte doesalphafold2modelproteinsintracellularconformationsanexperimentaltestusingcrosslinkingmassspectrometryofendogenousciliaryproteins