Reception and development of ‘alte kenotik’ in the russian theological and academic tradition
The article studies the roots of the theory of gradual manifestation of divine Nature of Christ in His human nature, which belongs to St. Innokenty (Borisov). In the initial section, the article provides a short explanation of the origin and development in the Lutheran world of the 16th — 17th centu...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
St. Tikhon's Orthodox University
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://periodical.pstgu.ru/ru/pdf/article/7513 |
| _version_ | 1811158186287169536 |
|---|---|
| author | Artem Malyshev |
| author_facet | Artem Malyshev |
| author_sort | Artem Malyshev |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article studies the roots of the theory of gradual manifestation of divine Nature of Christ in His human nature, which belongs to St. Innokenty (Borisov). In the initial section, the article provides a short explanation of the origin and development in the Lutheran world of the 16th — 17th centuries of a conception of kenosis of Christ, as his non-use of the divine majesty, i.e. the totality of the divine properties, communicated to His human nature. Having outlined the history of so-called “alte Kenotik”, the article describes its reception by the Russian theological tradition and analyses the conception of kenosis from the theological system of Archbishop Theofan (Prokopovich). The article also compares this conception with the theological views of Johann Quenstedt and the doctrine of St. Innokenty (Smirnov). Then it is shown that Christological theory of St. Innokenty (Borisov) is based on the ideas adopted by the Russian tradition from “alte Kenotik” of Lutheran scholastics. St. Innokenty (Borisov) admitted that kenosis of Christ referred to His deifi cated human nature and implied the limited realisation of divine properties communicated to it. It was also admitted by St. Innokenty (Borisov) that the full realisation of divine properties took place in the state of exaltation of Christ. The article not only demonstrates the integration of the ideas of “alte Kenotik” in the theory of St. Innokenty (Borisov), but also examines the original aspects of the latter. The originality of Christological theory of St. Innokenty (Borisov) is due to the idea that the manifestation of the divine nature in Christ is a process. Using the perception of Christ’s kenosis as a standard adopted in the theological and academic sphere, the Saint attempted to respond to I. Kant’s criticism of the traditional Christology and fill those gaps in Orthodox Christology which appeared due to the achievements of philosophy. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:20:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-52efa0a6a61448bda127d84628d64d0a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1991-640X 2409-4692 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T05:20:08Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | St. Tikhon's Orthodox University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия |
| spelling | doaj.art-52efa0a6a61448bda127d84628d64d0a2023-03-08T10:06:52ZrusSt. Tikhon's Orthodox UniversityВестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия1991-640X2409-46922021-12-0195952844http://dx.doi.org/10.15382/sturI202195.28-443Reception and development of ‘alte kenotik’ in the russian theological and academic traditionArtem Malyshev0St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; 6/1 Likhov pereulok, Moscow 127051, Russian FederationThe article studies the roots of the theory of gradual manifestation of divine Nature of Christ in His human nature, which belongs to St. Innokenty (Borisov). In the initial section, the article provides a short explanation of the origin and development in the Lutheran world of the 16th — 17th centuries of a conception of kenosis of Christ, as his non-use of the divine majesty, i.e. the totality of the divine properties, communicated to His human nature. Having outlined the history of so-called “alte Kenotik”, the article describes its reception by the Russian theological tradition and analyses the conception of kenosis from the theological system of Archbishop Theofan (Prokopovich). The article also compares this conception with the theological views of Johann Quenstedt and the doctrine of St. Innokenty (Smirnov). Then it is shown that Christological theory of St. Innokenty (Borisov) is based on the ideas adopted by the Russian tradition from “alte Kenotik” of Lutheran scholastics. St. Innokenty (Borisov) admitted that kenosis of Christ referred to His deifi cated human nature and implied the limited realisation of divine properties communicated to it. It was also admitted by St. Innokenty (Borisov) that the full realisation of divine properties took place in the state of exaltation of Christ. The article not only demonstrates the integration of the ideas of “alte Kenotik” in the theory of St. Innokenty (Borisov), but also examines the original aspects of the latter. The originality of Christological theory of St. Innokenty (Borisov) is due to the idea that the manifestation of the divine nature in Christ is a process. Using the perception of Christ’s kenosis as a standard adopted in the theological and academic sphere, the Saint attempted to respond to I. Kant’s criticism of the traditional Christology and fill those gaps in Orthodox Christology which appeared due to the achievements of philosophy.https://periodical.pstgu.ru/ru/pdf/article/7513kenosis christology lutheranism russian theology johann quenstedt archbishop theofan (prokopovich) st. innokenty (smirnov) st. innokenty (borisov)кеносис христология лютеранство русское богословие иоганн квенштедт архиеп. феофан (прокопович) свт. иннокентий (смирнов) свт. иннокентий (борисов) |
| spellingShingle | Artem Malyshev Reception and development of ‘alte kenotik’ in the russian theological and academic tradition Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия I. Богословие, философия kenosis christology lutheranism russian theology johann quenstedt archbishop theofan (prokopovich) st. innokenty (smirnov) st. innokenty (borisov) кеносис христология лютеранство русское богословие иоганн квенштедт архиеп. феофан (прокопович) свт. иннокентий (смирнов) свт. иннокентий (борисов) |
| title | Reception and development of ‘alte kenotik’ in the russian theological and academic tradition |
| title_full | Reception and development of ‘alte kenotik’ in the russian theological and academic tradition |
| title_fullStr | Reception and development of ‘alte kenotik’ in the russian theological and academic tradition |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reception and development of ‘alte kenotik’ in the russian theological and academic tradition |
| title_short | Reception and development of ‘alte kenotik’ in the russian theological and academic tradition |
| title_sort | reception and development of alte kenotik in the russian theological and academic tradition |
| topic | kenosis christology lutheranism russian theology johann quenstedt archbishop theofan (prokopovich) st. innokenty (smirnov) st. innokenty (borisov) кеносис христология лютеранство русское богословие иоганн квенштедт архиеп. феофан (прокопович) свт. иннокентий (смирнов) свт. иннокентий (борисов) |
| url | https://periodical.pstgu.ru/ru/pdf/article/7513 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT artemmalyshev receptionanddevelopmentofaltekenotikintherussiantheologicalandacademictradition |