Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy different bioactive smart composites: An in vitro study
Background: Composites are the widely used restorative materials, and over the year, newer restorative composites have been introduced to eliminate the drawbacks of previous ones. The recent advance in restorative dentistry is bioactive restorative materials. However, bacterial plaque formation on t...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2021;volume=39;issue=4;spage=388;epage=391;aulast=Chaudhari |
| _version_ | 1798024263691665408 |
|---|---|
| author | Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari N D Shashikiran Sachin Gugawad Namrata Gaonkar Swapnil Taur Savita Hadkar Shreya Bapat |
| author_facet | Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari N D Shashikiran Sachin Gugawad Namrata Gaonkar Swapnil Taur Savita Hadkar Shreya Bapat |
| author_sort | Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Composites are the widely used restorative materials, and over the year, newer restorative composites have been introduced to eliminate the drawbacks of previous ones. The recent advance in restorative dentistry is bioactive restorative materials. However, bacterial plaque formation on these restorations is the primary reason for secondary caries. Aims and objectives: The purpose of this study was to do the comparative evaluation of bioactive restorative composites (Beautifil Flow Plus, Activa BioACTIVE, and Filtek Z250 XT as control) for their antibacterial efficacy under in vitro conditions. Materials and Method: Thirty material blocks were used for this evaluation. Antibacterial efficacy was checked against Streptococcus mutans and observed under confocal laser scanning microscopy. Results: The results showed that Activa BioACTIVE shows maximum number of dead bacteria on the material surface compared to other groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded as it has maximum antibacterial efficacy among tested materials. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T17:59:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-52f28ccf154e4b659206aabfe75298ad |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0970-4388 1998-3905 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T17:59:39Z |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj.art-52f28ccf154e4b659206aabfe75298ad2022-12-22T04:10:33ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052021-01-0139438839110.4103/jisppd.jisppd_70_21Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy different bioactive smart composites: An in vitro studyPradnya Ramkrishna ChaudhariN D ShashikiranSachin GugawadNamrata GaonkarSwapnil TaurSavita HadkarShreya BapatBackground: Composites are the widely used restorative materials, and over the year, newer restorative composites have been introduced to eliminate the drawbacks of previous ones. The recent advance in restorative dentistry is bioactive restorative materials. However, bacterial plaque formation on these restorations is the primary reason for secondary caries. Aims and objectives: The purpose of this study was to do the comparative evaluation of bioactive restorative composites (Beautifil Flow Plus, Activa BioACTIVE, and Filtek Z250 XT as control) for their antibacterial efficacy under in vitro conditions. Materials and Method: Thirty material blocks were used for this evaluation. Antibacterial efficacy was checked against Streptococcus mutans and observed under confocal laser scanning microscopy. Results: The results showed that Activa BioACTIVE shows maximum number of dead bacteria on the material surface compared to other groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded as it has maximum antibacterial efficacy among tested materials.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2021;volume=39;issue=4;spage=388;epage=391;aulast=Chaudhariantibacterial efficacybioactive compositesconfocal laser scanningsmart composites |
| spellingShingle | Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari N D Shashikiran Sachin Gugawad Namrata Gaonkar Swapnil Taur Savita Hadkar Shreya Bapat Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy different bioactive smart composites: An in vitro study Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry antibacterial efficacy bioactive composites confocal laser scanning smart composites |
| title | Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy different bioactive smart composites: An in vitro study |
| title_full | Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy different bioactive smart composites: An in vitro study |
| title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy different bioactive smart composites: An in vitro study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy different bioactive smart composites: An in vitro study |
| title_short | Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy different bioactive smart composites: An in vitro study |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy different bioactive smart composites an in vitro study |
| topic | antibacterial efficacy bioactive composites confocal laser scanning smart composites |
| url | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2021;volume=39;issue=4;spage=388;epage=391;aulast=Chaudhari |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pradnyaramkrishnachaudhari comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacydifferentbioactivesmartcompositesaninvitrostudy AT ndshashikiran comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacydifferentbioactivesmartcompositesaninvitrostudy AT sachingugawad comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacydifferentbioactivesmartcompositesaninvitrostudy AT namratagaonkar comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacydifferentbioactivesmartcompositesaninvitrostudy AT swapniltaur comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacydifferentbioactivesmartcompositesaninvitrostudy AT savitahadkar comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacydifferentbioactivesmartcompositesaninvitrostudy AT shreyabapat comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacydifferentbioactivesmartcompositesaninvitrostudy |