Downside financial risk is misunderstood

The mathematics of downside financial risk can be difficult to understand: For example a 50% loss requires a subsequent 100% gain to break-even. A given percentage loss always requires a greater percentage gain to break-even. Instead, many non-expert investors may assume for example that a 50% gain...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Philip W. S. Newall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2016-09-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500004526/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797695982638465024
author Philip W. S. Newall
author_facet Philip W. S. Newall
author_sort Philip W. S. Newall
collection DOAJ
description The mathematics of downside financial risk can be difficult to understand: For example a 50% loss requires a subsequent 100% gain to break-even. A given percentage loss always requires a greater percentage gain to break-even. Instead, many non-expert investors may assume for example that a 50% gain is sufficient to offset a 50% loss. Over 3,498 participants and five experiments, the widespread illusion that a sequence of equal percentage gains and losses produces a zero overall return was demonstrated. Participants continued to err frequently, even with percentage returns of +/-100%, or when financially incentivized. Financial literacy, numeracy, and deliberation were all shown to independently contribute to accurate performance. These results have implications for promoting the understanding of downside financial risk.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:20:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-52f2f7e12eda4311852f76958f68bc84
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T03:20:05Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-52f2f7e12eda4311852f76958f68bc842023-09-03T14:02:35ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752016-09-011141642310.1017/S1930297500004526Downside financial risk is misunderstoodPhilip W. S. Newall0Behavioural Science Centre, Stirling Management School, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, U.K.The mathematics of downside financial risk can be difficult to understand: For example a 50% loss requires a subsequent 100% gain to break-even. A given percentage loss always requires a greater percentage gain to break-even. Instead, many non-expert investors may assume for example that a 50% gain is sufficient to offset a 50% loss. Over 3,498 participants and five experiments, the widespread illusion that a sequence of equal percentage gains and losses produces a zero overall return was demonstrated. Participants continued to err frequently, even with percentage returns of +/-100%, or when financially incentivized. Financial literacy, numeracy, and deliberation were all shown to independently contribute to accurate performance. These results have implications for promoting the understanding of downside financial risk.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500004526/type/journal_articlefinancial riskdownside risknumeracypercentagesfinancial literacydeliberation
spellingShingle Philip W. S. Newall
Downside financial risk is misunderstood
Judgment and Decision Making
financial risk
downside risk
numeracy
percentages
financial literacy
deliberation
title Downside financial risk is misunderstood
title_full Downside financial risk is misunderstood
title_fullStr Downside financial risk is misunderstood
title_full_unstemmed Downside financial risk is misunderstood
title_short Downside financial risk is misunderstood
title_sort downside financial risk is misunderstood
topic financial risk
downside risk
numeracy
percentages
financial literacy
deliberation
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500004526/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT philipwsnewall downsidefinancialriskismisunderstood