Downside financial risk is misunderstood
The mathematics of downside financial risk can be difficult to understand: For example a 50% loss requires a subsequent 100% gain to break-even. A given percentage loss always requires a greater percentage gain to break-even. Instead, many non-expert investors may assume for example that a 50% gain...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2016-09-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500004526/type/journal_article |
_version_ | 1797695982638465024 |
---|---|
author | Philip W. S. Newall |
author_facet | Philip W. S. Newall |
author_sort | Philip W. S. Newall |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The mathematics of downside financial risk can be difficult to understand: For example a 50% loss requires a subsequent 100% gain to break-even. A given percentage loss always requires a greater percentage gain to break-even. Instead, many non-expert investors may assume for example that a 50% gain is sufficient to offset a 50% loss. Over 3,498 participants and five experiments, the widespread illusion that a sequence of equal percentage gains and losses produces a zero overall return was demonstrated. Participants continued to err frequently, even with percentage returns of +/-100%, or when financially incentivized. Financial literacy, numeracy, and deliberation were all shown to independently contribute to accurate performance. These results have implications for promoting the understanding of downside financial risk. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T03:20:05Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-52f2f7e12eda4311852f76958f68bc84 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1930-2975 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T03:20:05Z |
publishDate | 2016-09-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Judgment and Decision Making |
spelling | doaj.art-52f2f7e12eda4311852f76958f68bc842023-09-03T14:02:35ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752016-09-011141642310.1017/S1930297500004526Downside financial risk is misunderstoodPhilip W. S. Newall0Behavioural Science Centre, Stirling Management School, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, U.K.The mathematics of downside financial risk can be difficult to understand: For example a 50% loss requires a subsequent 100% gain to break-even. A given percentage loss always requires a greater percentage gain to break-even. Instead, many non-expert investors may assume for example that a 50% gain is sufficient to offset a 50% loss. Over 3,498 participants and five experiments, the widespread illusion that a sequence of equal percentage gains and losses produces a zero overall return was demonstrated. Participants continued to err frequently, even with percentage returns of +/-100%, or when financially incentivized. Financial literacy, numeracy, and deliberation were all shown to independently contribute to accurate performance. These results have implications for promoting the understanding of downside financial risk.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500004526/type/journal_articlefinancial riskdownside risknumeracypercentagesfinancial literacydeliberation |
spellingShingle | Philip W. S. Newall Downside financial risk is misunderstood Judgment and Decision Making financial risk downside risk numeracy percentages financial literacy deliberation |
title | Downside financial risk is misunderstood |
title_full | Downside financial risk is misunderstood |
title_fullStr | Downside financial risk is misunderstood |
title_full_unstemmed | Downside financial risk is misunderstood |
title_short | Downside financial risk is misunderstood |
title_sort | downside financial risk is misunderstood |
topic | financial risk downside risk numeracy percentages financial literacy deliberation |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500004526/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT philipwsnewall downsidefinancialriskismisunderstood |