Conceptualizations of “good death” and their relationship to technology: A scoping review and discourse analysis

Abstract Background and Aims By the 1960s, medicine experienced technological revolutions that enabled it to control and medicalize death in many circumstances. The modern conceptualization of “good death” emerged in the late 1960s with the beginning of the hospice movement, and palliative care beca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michal Coret, Maria Athina (Tina) Martimianakis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-07-01
Series:Health Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1374
_version_ 1827891422293917696
author Michal Coret
Maria Athina (Tina) Martimianakis
author_facet Michal Coret
Maria Athina (Tina) Martimianakis
author_sort Michal Coret
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background and Aims By the 1960s, medicine experienced technological revolutions that enabled it to control and medicalize death in many circumstances. The modern conceptualization of “good death” emerged in the late 1960s with the beginning of the hospice movement, and palliative care became an official medical specialty in 1987. This project aims to elucidate how the idea of “good death” has been discussed and perceived since then, as well as the impact of medical technologies on death. Methods The terms “good death,” “technology,” and “palliative care” were searched. One hundred ninety English sources that discussed “good death” explicitly or implicitly, published between 1987 and 2020, were included in the final analysis. Texts were analyzed for discursive themes related to “good death” and technology and demographic data related to authors, geographies, types of text, and date of publication. Results The discourse of a “good death” with the patient being in control dominated the archive. Other discourses include a good death being peaceful and comfortable, one where the patient is not alone, and one that is not prolonged. Medical technology discourses are largely negative in the setting of death. Conclusion Findings indicate a strong critique of the medicalization of death in the literature. This also complements the dominance of discourses on patient autonomy. Medical discourses of “good death” and technology permeate discussion outside of the healthcare context, and there is an absence of spirituality and neutrality in “good death” discourses. The results of this study are relevant for ethics and communication in geriatric and palliative care.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:25:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-52f9ff8a9c6d4419a214574d62f54eec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-8835
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:25:35Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Science Reports
spelling doaj.art-52f9ff8a9c6d4419a214574d62f54eec2023-07-28T08:52:32ZengWileyHealth Science Reports2398-88352023-07-0167n/an/a10.1002/hsr2.1374Conceptualizations of “good death” and their relationship to technology: A scoping review and discourse analysisMichal Coret0Maria Athina (Tina) Martimianakis1Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaWilson Centre and Department of Paediatrics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario CanadaAbstract Background and Aims By the 1960s, medicine experienced technological revolutions that enabled it to control and medicalize death in many circumstances. The modern conceptualization of “good death” emerged in the late 1960s with the beginning of the hospice movement, and palliative care became an official medical specialty in 1987. This project aims to elucidate how the idea of “good death” has been discussed and perceived since then, as well as the impact of medical technologies on death. Methods The terms “good death,” “technology,” and “palliative care” were searched. One hundred ninety English sources that discussed “good death” explicitly or implicitly, published between 1987 and 2020, were included in the final analysis. Texts were analyzed for discursive themes related to “good death” and technology and demographic data related to authors, geographies, types of text, and date of publication. Results The discourse of a “good death” with the patient being in control dominated the archive. Other discourses include a good death being peaceful and comfortable, one where the patient is not alone, and one that is not prolonged. Medical technology discourses are largely negative in the setting of death. Conclusion Findings indicate a strong critique of the medicalization of death in the literature. This also complements the dominance of discourses on patient autonomy. Medical discourses of “good death” and technology permeate discussion outside of the healthcare context, and there is an absence of spirituality and neutrality in “good death” discourses. The results of this study are relevant for ethics and communication in geriatric and palliative care.https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1374discourse analysisgeriatricsgood deathpalliativetechnology
spellingShingle Michal Coret
Maria Athina (Tina) Martimianakis
Conceptualizations of “good death” and their relationship to technology: A scoping review and discourse analysis
Health Science Reports
discourse analysis
geriatrics
good death
palliative
technology
title Conceptualizations of “good death” and their relationship to technology: A scoping review and discourse analysis
title_full Conceptualizations of “good death” and their relationship to technology: A scoping review and discourse analysis
title_fullStr Conceptualizations of “good death” and their relationship to technology: A scoping review and discourse analysis
title_full_unstemmed Conceptualizations of “good death” and their relationship to technology: A scoping review and discourse analysis
title_short Conceptualizations of “good death” and their relationship to technology: A scoping review and discourse analysis
title_sort conceptualizations of good death and their relationship to technology a scoping review and discourse analysis
topic discourse analysis
geriatrics
good death
palliative
technology
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1374
work_keys_str_mv AT michalcoret conceptualizationsofgooddeathandtheirrelationshiptotechnologyascopingreviewanddiscourseanalysis
AT mariaathinatinamartimianakis conceptualizationsofgooddeathandtheirrelationshiptotechnologyascopingreviewanddiscourseanalysis