Elderly Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

Abstract Introduction The 2014 American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) guidelines recommend anticoagulation to reduce clot formation and the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation but does not specify guidelines for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessika Lobraico-Fernandez, Salma Baksh, Eric Nemec
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2019-05-01
Series:Drugs in R&D
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40268-019-0275-y
_version_ 1818406053637783552
author Jessika Lobraico-Fernandez
Salma Baksh
Eric Nemec
author_facet Jessika Lobraico-Fernandez
Salma Baksh
Eric Nemec
author_sort Jessika Lobraico-Fernandez
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction The 2014 American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) guidelines recommend anticoagulation to reduce clot formation and the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation but does not specify guidelines for the elderly population. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are newer US FDA-approved alternatives to warfarin and include dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban. The efficacy of DOACs is heavily researched, but few studies have evaluated their bleeding risk. Objectives This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates which DOAC has the lowest bleeding risk in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods CINAHL and MEDLINE databases were searched using specific keywords, and 244 results were identified and screened. Inclusion criteria required a major bleeding event requiring hospitalization as an outcome and excluded patients with severe renal failure. Articles that met inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies. Review Manager (version 5) was used to perform the random-effects model meta-analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Six articles met inclusion criteria and encompassed 446,042 patients in total. Apixaban and dabigatran had statistically significant risk reductions compared with warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban did not (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.52–0.69], p < 0.00001; HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.70–0.90], p = 0.0005; HR 1.03 [95% CI 0.86–1.22], p = 0.77, respectively.) Data regarding edoxaban were limited and thus not included in the analysis. Conclusion Apixaban and dabigatran have a significantly decreased major bleeding risk (40 and 21%, respectively) compared with warfarin. There was no statistical difference in bleeding risk between rivaroxaban and warfarin. Head-to-head prospective randomized controlled trials are required to assess the true bleeding risk of each DOAC.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T09:05:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-53068a9767c04dfda5f30693227e9320
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1174-5886
1179-6901
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T09:05:50Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Adis, Springer Healthcare
record_format Article
series Drugs in R&D
spelling doaj.art-53068a9767c04dfda5f30693227e93202022-12-21T23:08:42ZengAdis, Springer HealthcareDrugs in R&D1174-58861179-69012019-05-0119323524510.1007/s40268-019-0275-yElderly Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort StudiesJessika Lobraico-Fernandez0Salma Baksh1Eric Nemec2Sacred Heart University Physician Assistant StudiesColumbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian HospitalSacred Heart University Physician Assistant StudiesAbstract Introduction The 2014 American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) guidelines recommend anticoagulation to reduce clot formation and the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation but does not specify guidelines for the elderly population. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are newer US FDA-approved alternatives to warfarin and include dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban. The efficacy of DOACs is heavily researched, but few studies have evaluated their bleeding risk. Objectives This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates which DOAC has the lowest bleeding risk in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods CINAHL and MEDLINE databases were searched using specific keywords, and 244 results were identified and screened. Inclusion criteria required a major bleeding event requiring hospitalization as an outcome and excluded patients with severe renal failure. Articles that met inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies. Review Manager (version 5) was used to perform the random-effects model meta-analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Six articles met inclusion criteria and encompassed 446,042 patients in total. Apixaban and dabigatran had statistically significant risk reductions compared with warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban did not (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.52–0.69], p < 0.00001; HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.70–0.90], p = 0.0005; HR 1.03 [95% CI 0.86–1.22], p = 0.77, respectively.) Data regarding edoxaban were limited and thus not included in the analysis. Conclusion Apixaban and dabigatran have a significantly decreased major bleeding risk (40 and 21%, respectively) compared with warfarin. There was no statistical difference in bleeding risk between rivaroxaban and warfarin. Head-to-head prospective randomized controlled trials are required to assess the true bleeding risk of each DOAC.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40268-019-0275-y
spellingShingle Jessika Lobraico-Fernandez
Salma Baksh
Eric Nemec
Elderly Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
Drugs in R&D
title Elderly Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_full Elderly Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_fullStr Elderly Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_full_unstemmed Elderly Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_short Elderly Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
title_sort elderly bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation a systematic review and meta analysis of cohort studies
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40268-019-0275-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jessikalobraicofernandez elderlybleedingriskofdirectoralanticoagulantsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT salmabaksh elderlybleedingriskofdirectoralanticoagulantsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT ericnemec elderlybleedingriskofdirectoralanticoagulantsinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcohortstudies