A test to determine the site of abnormal neuromuscular refractoriness

Objective: The relative refractory period (RRP) of motor axons is an important parameter in nerve excitability tests of the recovery cycle (RC). Abnormalities may have a site in the axonal membrane, the neuromuscular junction, or in a dysfunction of the muscle. We aimed in this study to determine th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hatice Tankisi, Hugh Bostock, Peter Grafe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-01-01
Series:Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X21000470
_version_ 1811197591662100480
author Hatice Tankisi
Hugh Bostock
Peter Grafe
author_facet Hatice Tankisi
Hugh Bostock
Peter Grafe
author_sort Hatice Tankisi
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The relative refractory period (RRP) of motor axons is an important parameter in nerve excitability tests of the recovery cycle (RC). Abnormalities may have a site in the axonal membrane, the neuromuscular junction, or in a dysfunction of the muscle. We aimed in this study to determine the site of abnormality, using a modified protocol of the conventional RC test, whereby an additional supramaximal stimulus is added at the same interstimulus interval as in RC recordings (RCSM). Methods: Twenty-four healthy subjects aged 37.8 ± 2.4 years (mean ± SE) were examined with median nerve excitability testing using RC and RCSM protocols at normal temperature (34.1 ± 0.2 °C). The recordings were repeated in 12 subjects after selective cooling of the thenar muscle (25.2 ± 0.7 °C) and in 12 subjects after cooling the nerve trunk at the wrist (24.9 ± 0.3 °C). Results: After cooling the nerve, RRP measured with RC and RCSM were prolonged similarly (medians by 1.8 ms, and 2.1 ms respectively). In contrast, cooling the muscle prolonged RRP measured with RC (by 1.3 ms), but did not significantly prolong RRP measured with RCSM. RRPs measured by RC and RCSM were significantly different when cooling was at the muscle (P = 5.10-4), but not when cooling was at the nerve (P = 0.57). Conclusions: A difference between RC and RCSM indicates abnormal excitability distal to the axonal membrane under the stimulating electrode. Significance: Combining RCSM with the conventional RC protocol should help to localize the site of abnormal neuromuscular refractoriness.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T01:17:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-530f8694fc9f42d8861ffb91e20aaede
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2467-981X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T01:17:32Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
spelling doaj.art-530f8694fc9f42d8861ffb91e20aaede2022-12-22T03:53:54ZengElsevierClinical Neurophysiology Practice2467-981X2022-01-01716A test to determine the site of abnormal neuromuscular refractorinessHatice Tankisi0Hugh Bostock1Peter Grafe2Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Corresponding author at: Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UKInstitute of Physiology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, GermanyObjective: The relative refractory period (RRP) of motor axons is an important parameter in nerve excitability tests of the recovery cycle (RC). Abnormalities may have a site in the axonal membrane, the neuromuscular junction, or in a dysfunction of the muscle. We aimed in this study to determine the site of abnormality, using a modified protocol of the conventional RC test, whereby an additional supramaximal stimulus is added at the same interstimulus interval as in RC recordings (RCSM). Methods: Twenty-four healthy subjects aged 37.8 ± 2.4 years (mean ± SE) were examined with median nerve excitability testing using RC and RCSM protocols at normal temperature (34.1 ± 0.2 °C). The recordings were repeated in 12 subjects after selective cooling of the thenar muscle (25.2 ± 0.7 °C) and in 12 subjects after cooling the nerve trunk at the wrist (24.9 ± 0.3 °C). Results: After cooling the nerve, RRP measured with RC and RCSM were prolonged similarly (medians by 1.8 ms, and 2.1 ms respectively). In contrast, cooling the muscle prolonged RRP measured with RC (by 1.3 ms), but did not significantly prolong RRP measured with RCSM. RRPs measured by RC and RCSM were significantly different when cooling was at the muscle (P = 5.10-4), but not when cooling was at the nerve (P = 0.57). Conclusions: A difference between RC and RCSM indicates abnormal excitability distal to the axonal membrane under the stimulating electrode. Significance: Combining RCSM with the conventional RC protocol should help to localize the site of abnormal neuromuscular refractoriness.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X21000470Nerve excitabilityRecovery cycleRefractorinessCooling the nerveCooling the muscleRCSM protocol
spellingShingle Hatice Tankisi
Hugh Bostock
Peter Grafe
A test to determine the site of abnormal neuromuscular refractoriness
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
Nerve excitability
Recovery cycle
Refractoriness
Cooling the nerve
Cooling the muscle
RCSM protocol
title A test to determine the site of abnormal neuromuscular refractoriness
title_full A test to determine the site of abnormal neuromuscular refractoriness
title_fullStr A test to determine the site of abnormal neuromuscular refractoriness
title_full_unstemmed A test to determine the site of abnormal neuromuscular refractoriness
title_short A test to determine the site of abnormal neuromuscular refractoriness
title_sort test to determine the site of abnormal neuromuscular refractoriness
topic Nerve excitability
Recovery cycle
Refractoriness
Cooling the nerve
Cooling the muscle
RCSM protocol
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X21000470
work_keys_str_mv AT haticetankisi atesttodeterminethesiteofabnormalneuromuscularrefractoriness
AT hughbostock atesttodeterminethesiteofabnormalneuromuscularrefractoriness
AT petergrafe atesttodeterminethesiteofabnormalneuromuscularrefractoriness
AT haticetankisi testtodeterminethesiteofabnormalneuromuscularrefractoriness
AT hughbostock testtodeterminethesiteofabnormalneuromuscularrefractoriness
AT petergrafe testtodeterminethesiteofabnormalneuromuscularrefractoriness