RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF GLIAL BRAIN TUMORS

Objective: To improve the treatment results of patients with brain glioma of varying degrees of malignancy by improving post-operative diagnostics and surgical tactics. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 843 patients was carried out. Examined indicators of overall survival according to the degr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R.G. ASHUROV, E.A. KOROTKEVICH, R.R. SIDOROVICH
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Avicenna Tajik State Medical University 2017-12-01
Series:Паёми Сино
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.25005/2074-0581-2017-19-4-476-481
_version_ 1797796925170253824
author R.G. ASHUROV
E.A. KOROTKEVICH
R.R. SIDOROVICH
author_facet R.G. ASHUROV
E.A. KOROTKEVICH
R.R. SIDOROVICH
author_sort R.G. ASHUROV
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To improve the treatment results of patients with brain glioma of varying degrees of malignancy by improving post-operative diagnostics and surgical tactics. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 843 patients was carried out. Examined indicators of overall survival according to the degree of malignancy of neoplasms and the use of modern surgical technologies. The prospective analysis included 118 patients with brain glioma located in the functionally significant brain zones. Specified patients in addition to the standard neuroimaging study, diffusion-tensor tractography, surgical interventions used neuronavigation, microsurgical and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring techniques. Results: Among treated patients with brain gliomas, the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-years overall survival probability amounted accordingly 60.9%, 37.6%, 32.3%, and 22.7%, with median survival rates of 1.42 years, respectively. Implementation of both navigation and microsurgery technique during surgery significantly improved long-term outcomes, especially for high level malignant gliomas (p=0,005). When comparing the frequency of postoperative neurologic deficits in the main and control groups, revealed a statistically significant difference (p1 =0.049). Conclusion: The diagnostic algorithm optimization and improvement of the surgical approach contribute to improving the results of treatment in patients with brain gliomas.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:40:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-531c127c5713496380b7c77d96b299ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2074-0581
2959-6327
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:40:28Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
record_format Article
series Паёми Сино
spelling doaj.art-531c127c5713496380b7c77d96b299ef2023-06-23T08:07:58ZengAvicenna Tajik State Medical UniversityПаёми Сино2074-05812959-63272017-12-0119447648110.25005/2074-0581-2017-19-4-476-481RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF GLIAL BRAIN TUMORSR.G. ASHUROV0E.A. KOROTKEVICH1R.R. SIDOROVICH2Scientific and Practical Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Minsk, Republic of BelarusScientific and Practical Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Minsk, Republic of BelarusScientific and Practical Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Minsk, Republic of BelarusObjective: To improve the treatment results of patients with brain glioma of varying degrees of malignancy by improving post-operative diagnostics and surgical tactics. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 843 patients was carried out. Examined indicators of overall survival according to the degree of malignancy of neoplasms and the use of modern surgical technologies. The prospective analysis included 118 patients with brain glioma located in the functionally significant brain zones. Specified patients in addition to the standard neuroimaging study, diffusion-tensor tractography, surgical interventions used neuronavigation, microsurgical and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring techniques. Results: Among treated patients with brain gliomas, the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-years overall survival probability amounted accordingly 60.9%, 37.6%, 32.3%, and 22.7%, with median survival rates of 1.42 years, respectively. Implementation of both navigation and microsurgery technique during surgery significantly improved long-term outcomes, especially for high level malignant gliomas (p=0,005). When comparing the frequency of postoperative neurologic deficits in the main and control groups, revealed a statistically significant difference (p1 =0.049). Conclusion: The diagnostic algorithm optimization and improvement of the surgical approach contribute to improving the results of treatment in patients with brain gliomas.https://doi.org/10.25005/2074-0581-2017-19-4-476-481brainglial tumourssurgeryperioperative diagnostics.
spellingShingle R.G. ASHUROV
E.A. KOROTKEVICH
R.R. SIDOROVICH
RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF GLIAL BRAIN TUMORS
Паёми Сино
brain
glial tumours
surgery
perioperative diagnostics.
title RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF GLIAL BRAIN TUMORS
title_full RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF GLIAL BRAIN TUMORS
title_fullStr RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF GLIAL BRAIN TUMORS
title_full_unstemmed RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF GLIAL BRAIN TUMORS
title_short RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF GLIAL BRAIN TUMORS
title_sort results of treatment of glial brain tumors
topic brain
glial tumours
surgery
perioperative diagnostics.
url https://doi.org/10.25005/2074-0581-2017-19-4-476-481
work_keys_str_mv AT rgashurov resultsoftreatmentofglialbraintumors
AT eakorotkevich resultsoftreatmentofglialbraintumors
AT rrsidorovich resultsoftreatmentofglialbraintumors