Prognostic Value in Preoperative Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Objective To evaluate the effect of Veterans RAND 12-item health survey mental composite score (VR-12 MCS) on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Methods Retrospective data from a single-surgeon database created 2 cohorts: patient...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Neurospine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2346730-365.pdf |
_version_ | 1827304137334718464 |
---|---|
author | Ishan Khosla Fatima N. Anwar Andrea M. Roca Srinath S. Medakkar Alexandra C. Loya Keith R. MacGregor Omolabake O. Oyetayo Eileen Zheng Aayush Kaul Jacob C. Wolf Vincent P. Federico Gregory D. Lopez Arash J. Sayari Kern Singh |
author_facet | Ishan Khosla Fatima N. Anwar Andrea M. Roca Srinath S. Medakkar Alexandra C. Loya Keith R. MacGregor Omolabake O. Oyetayo Eileen Zheng Aayush Kaul Jacob C. Wolf Vincent P. Federico Gregory D. Lopez Arash J. Sayari Kern Singh |
author_sort | Ishan Khosla |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective To evaluate the effect of Veterans RAND 12-item health survey mental composite score (VR-12 MCS) on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Methods Retrospective data from a single-surgeon database created 2 cohorts: patients with VR-12 MCS ≥ 50 or VR-12 MCS < 50. Preoperative, 6-week, and final follow-up (FF)- PROMs including VR-12 MCS/physical composite score (PCS), 12-item Short Form health survey (SF-12) MCS/PCS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), visual analogue scale (VAS)-back/leg pain (VAS-BP/LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected. ∆6-week and ∆FF-PROMs were calculated. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates were determined from established cutoffs from the literature. For intercohort comparison, chi-square analysis was used for categorical variables, and Student t-test for continuous variables. Results Seventy-nine patients were included; 25 were in VR-12 MCS < 50. Mean postoperative follow-up time was 17.12 ± 8.43 months. The VR-12 MCS < 50 cohort had worse VR-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS, PROMIS-PF, PHQ-9, VAS-BP, and ODI scores preoperatively (p ≤ 0.014, all), worse VR-12 MCS/PCS, SF-12 MCS, PROMIS-PF, PHQ-9, and ODI scores at 6-week postoperatively (p ≤ 0.039, all), and worse VR-12 MCS, SF-12 MCS, PROMIS-PF, PHQ-9, VAS-BP, VAS-LP, and ODI scores at FF (p ≤ 0.046, all). The VR-12 MCS < 50 cohort showed greater improvement in VR-12 MCS and SF-12 MCS scores at 6 weeks and FF (p ≤ 0.005, all). The VR-12 MCS < 50 cohort experienced greater MCID achievement for VR-12 MCS, SF-12 MCS, and PHQ-9 (p ≤ 0.006, all). Conclusion VR-12 MCS < 50 yielded worse mental health, physical function, pain and disability postoperatively, yet reported greater improvements in magnitude and MCID achievement for mental health. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T17:24:46Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-5325dec2543e4db987f083dfde8b1433 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2586-6583 2586-6591 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T17:24:46Z |
publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
publisher | Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society |
record_format | Article |
series | Neurospine |
spelling | doaj.art-5325dec2543e4db987f083dfde8b14332024-03-28T07:08:11ZengKorean Spinal Neurosurgery SocietyNeurospine2586-65832586-65912024-03-0121136137110.14245/ns.2346730.3651520Prognostic Value in Preoperative Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody FusionIshan Khosla0Fatima N. Anwar1Andrea M. Roca2Srinath S. Medakkar3Alexandra C. Loya4Keith R. MacGregor5Omolabake O. Oyetayo6Eileen Zheng7Aayush Kaul8Jacob C. Wolf9Vincent P. Federico10Gregory D. Lopez11Arash J. Sayari12Kern Singh13 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, IL, USA Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USAObjective To evaluate the effect of Veterans RAND 12-item health survey mental composite score (VR-12 MCS) on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Methods Retrospective data from a single-surgeon database created 2 cohorts: patients with VR-12 MCS ≥ 50 or VR-12 MCS < 50. Preoperative, 6-week, and final follow-up (FF)- PROMs including VR-12 MCS/physical composite score (PCS), 12-item Short Form health survey (SF-12) MCS/PCS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), visual analogue scale (VAS)-back/leg pain (VAS-BP/LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected. ∆6-week and ∆FF-PROMs were calculated. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates were determined from established cutoffs from the literature. For intercohort comparison, chi-square analysis was used for categorical variables, and Student t-test for continuous variables. Results Seventy-nine patients were included; 25 were in VR-12 MCS < 50. Mean postoperative follow-up time was 17.12 ± 8.43 months. The VR-12 MCS < 50 cohort had worse VR-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS, PROMIS-PF, PHQ-9, VAS-BP, and ODI scores preoperatively (p ≤ 0.014, all), worse VR-12 MCS/PCS, SF-12 MCS, PROMIS-PF, PHQ-9, and ODI scores at 6-week postoperatively (p ≤ 0.039, all), and worse VR-12 MCS, SF-12 MCS, PROMIS-PF, PHQ-9, VAS-BP, VAS-LP, and ODI scores at FF (p ≤ 0.046, all). The VR-12 MCS < 50 cohort showed greater improvement in VR-12 MCS and SF-12 MCS scores at 6 weeks and FF (p ≤ 0.005, all). The VR-12 MCS < 50 cohort experienced greater MCID achievement for VR-12 MCS, SF-12 MCS, and PHQ-9 (p ≤ 0.006, all). Conclusion VR-12 MCS < 50 yielded worse mental health, physical function, pain and disability postoperatively, yet reported greater improvements in magnitude and MCID achievement for mental health.http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2346730-365.pdflateral lumbar interbody fusionoutcomesminimal clinically important difference |
spellingShingle | Ishan Khosla Fatima N. Anwar Andrea M. Roca Srinath S. Medakkar Alexandra C. Loya Keith R. MacGregor Omolabake O. Oyetayo Eileen Zheng Aayush Kaul Jacob C. Wolf Vincent P. Federico Gregory D. Lopez Arash J. Sayari Kern Singh Prognostic Value in Preoperative Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Neurospine lateral lumbar interbody fusion outcomes minimal clinically important difference |
title | Prognostic Value in Preoperative Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_full | Prognostic Value in Preoperative Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Value in Preoperative Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Value in Preoperative Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_short | Prognostic Value in Preoperative Veterans RAND-12 Mental Component Score on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
title_sort | prognostic value in preoperative veterans rand 12 mental component score on clinical outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion |
topic | lateral lumbar interbody fusion outcomes minimal clinically important difference |
url | http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2346730-365.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ishankhosla prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT fatimananwar prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT andreamroca prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT srinathsmedakkar prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT alexandracloya prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT keithrmacgregor prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT omolabakeooyetayo prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT eileenzheng prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT aayushkaul prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT jacobcwolf prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT vincentpfederico prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT gregorydlopez prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT arashjsayari prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion AT kernsingh prognosticvalueinpreoperativeveteransrand12mentalcomponentscoreonclinicaloutcomesforpatientsundergoingminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusion |