Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements

Here we present new results comparing aerosol optical depth (AOD), aerosol absorption optical depth (AAOD) and column single scattering albedo (SSA) obtained from in situ vertical profile measurements with AERONET ground-based remote sensing from two rural, continental sites in the US. The profiles...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Andrews, J. A. Ogren, S. Kinne, B. Samset
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-05-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/6041/2017/acp-17-6041-2017.pdf
_version_ 1818131039027986432
author E. Andrews
J. A. Ogren
S. Kinne
B. Samset
author_facet E. Andrews
J. A. Ogren
S. Kinne
B. Samset
author_sort E. Andrews
collection DOAJ
description Here we present new results comparing aerosol optical depth (AOD), aerosol absorption optical depth (AAOD) and column single scattering albedo (SSA) obtained from in situ vertical profile measurements with AERONET ground-based remote sensing from two rural, continental sites in the US. The profiles are closely matched in time (within ±3 h) and space (within 15 km) with the AERONET retrievals. We have used Level 1.5 inversion retrievals when there was a valid Level 2 almucantar retrieval in order to be able to compare AAOD and column SSA below AERONET's recommended loading constraint (AOD &gt; 0.4 at 440 nm). While there is reasonable agreement for the AOD comparisons, the direct comparisons of in situ-derived to AERONET-retrieved AAOD (or SSA) reveal that AERONET retrievals yield higher aerosol absorption than obtained from the in situ profiles for the low aerosol optical depth conditions prevalent at the two study sites. However, it should be noted that the majority of SSA comparisons for AOD<sub>440</sub> &gt; 0.2 are, nonetheless, within the reported SSA uncertainty bounds. The observation that, relative to in situ measurements, AERONET inversions exhibit increased absorption potential at low AOD values is generally consistent with other published AERONET–in situ comparisons across a range of locations, atmospheric conditions and AOD values. This systematic difference in the comparisons suggests a bias in one or both of the methods, but we cannot assess whether the AERONET retrievals are biased towards high absorption or the in situ measurements are biased low. Based on the discrepancy between the AERONET and in situ values, we conclude that scaling modeled black carbon concentrations upwards to match AERONET retrievals of AAOD should be approached with caution as it may lead to aerosol absorption overestimates in regions of low AOD. Both AERONET retrievals and in situ measurements suggest there is a systematic relationship between SSA and aerosol amount (AOD or aerosol light scattering) – specifically that SSA decreases at lower aerosol loading. This implies that the fairly common assumption that AERONET SSA values retrieved at high-AOD conditions can be used to obtain AAOD at low-AOD conditions may not be valid.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T08:14:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-53456da9cbd2498f9ddcb19a514fddfb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T08:14:35Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-53456da9cbd2498f9ddcb19a514fddfb2022-12-22T01:14:47ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242017-05-011796041607210.5194/acp-17-6041-2017Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurementsE. Andrews0J. A. Ogren1S. Kinne2B. Samset3CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USANOAA/ESRL/GMD, Boulder, CO 80305, USAMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, 20146 Hamburg, GermanyCenter for International Climate and Environmental Research – Oslo (CICERO), 0349 Oslo, NorwayHere we present new results comparing aerosol optical depth (AOD), aerosol absorption optical depth (AAOD) and column single scattering albedo (SSA) obtained from in situ vertical profile measurements with AERONET ground-based remote sensing from two rural, continental sites in the US. The profiles are closely matched in time (within ±3 h) and space (within 15 km) with the AERONET retrievals. We have used Level 1.5 inversion retrievals when there was a valid Level 2 almucantar retrieval in order to be able to compare AAOD and column SSA below AERONET's recommended loading constraint (AOD &gt; 0.4 at 440 nm). While there is reasonable agreement for the AOD comparisons, the direct comparisons of in situ-derived to AERONET-retrieved AAOD (or SSA) reveal that AERONET retrievals yield higher aerosol absorption than obtained from the in situ profiles for the low aerosol optical depth conditions prevalent at the two study sites. However, it should be noted that the majority of SSA comparisons for AOD<sub>440</sub> &gt; 0.2 are, nonetheless, within the reported SSA uncertainty bounds. The observation that, relative to in situ measurements, AERONET inversions exhibit increased absorption potential at low AOD values is generally consistent with other published AERONET–in situ comparisons across a range of locations, atmospheric conditions and AOD values. This systematic difference in the comparisons suggests a bias in one or both of the methods, but we cannot assess whether the AERONET retrievals are biased towards high absorption or the in situ measurements are biased low. Based on the discrepancy between the AERONET and in situ values, we conclude that scaling modeled black carbon concentrations upwards to match AERONET retrievals of AAOD should be approached with caution as it may lead to aerosol absorption overestimates in regions of low AOD. Both AERONET retrievals and in situ measurements suggest there is a systematic relationship between SSA and aerosol amount (AOD or aerosol light scattering) – specifically that SSA decreases at lower aerosol loading. This implies that the fairly common assumption that AERONET SSA values retrieved at high-AOD conditions can be used to obtain AAOD at low-AOD conditions may not be valid.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/6041/2017/acp-17-6041-2017.pdf
spellingShingle E. Andrews
J. A. Ogren
S. Kinne
B. Samset
Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements
title_full Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements
title_fullStr Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements
title_short Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements
title_sort comparison of aod aaod and column single scattering albedo from aeronet retrievals and in situ profiling measurements
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/6041/2017/acp-17-6041-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT eandrews comparisonofaodaaodandcolumnsinglescatteringalbedofromaeronetretrievalsandinsituprofilingmeasurements
AT jaogren comparisonofaodaaodandcolumnsinglescatteringalbedofromaeronetretrievalsandinsituprofilingmeasurements
AT skinne comparisonofaodaaodandcolumnsinglescatteringalbedofromaeronetretrievalsandinsituprofilingmeasurements
AT bsamset comparisonofaodaaodandcolumnsinglescatteringalbedofromaeronetretrievalsandinsituprofilingmeasurements