Algorithmic complexity stratification for congenital heart disease patients

Background: Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) encompasses a huge variety of rare diagnoses that range in complexity and comorbidity. To help build clinical guidelines, plan health services and conduct statistically powerful research on such a disparate set of diseases there have been various attempts t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason Chami, Geoff Strange, David Baker, Rachael Cordina, Leeanne Grigg, David S. Celermajer, Calum Nicholson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-03-01
Series:International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666668522001136
_version_ 1811154707473760256
author Jason Chami
Geoff Strange
David Baker
Rachael Cordina
Leeanne Grigg
David S. Celermajer
Calum Nicholson
author_facet Jason Chami
Geoff Strange
David Baker
Rachael Cordina
Leeanne Grigg
David S. Celermajer
Calum Nicholson
author_sort Jason Chami
collection DOAJ
description Background: Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) encompasses a huge variety of rare diagnoses that range in complexity and comorbidity. To help build clinical guidelines, plan health services and conduct statistically powerful research on such a disparate set of diseases there have been various attempts to group pathologies into mild, moderate, or severe disease. So far, however, these complexity scores have required manual specialist input for every case, and are therefore missing in large databases where this is impractical, or quickly outdated when guidelines are revised. Methods: We used the up-to-date European Society of Cardiology guidelines to create an algorithm to assign complexity scores to CHD patients using only their diagnosis list. Two CHD specialists then independently assigned complexity scores to a random sample of patients. Results: Our algorithm was 96% accurate where both specialists agreed on a complexity score; this occurred 68% of the time overall, and 79% of the time in moderate or complex CHD. The algorithm “failed” mainly when diagnoses were insufficiently specific, usually for septal defects (where size was unspecified), or where complexity depends on the procedure performed (e.g. atrial/arterial switch for transposition of the great arteries). Conclusions: We were able to algorithmically determine the complexity scores of a majority of patients with CHD based on their diagnosis list alone. This could allow for automatic complexity scoring of most patients in large CHD databases, for example our own Registry of the Congenital Heart Alliance of Australia and New Zealand. This will facilitate targeted research into the management, outcomes and burden of CHD.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:20:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-535d3bd0d00d4cabace85c99e1bf5638
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-6685
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:20:34Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease
spelling doaj.art-535d3bd0d00d4cabace85c99e1bf56382023-03-11T04:20:45ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease2666-66852023-03-0111100430Algorithmic complexity stratification for congenital heart disease patientsJason Chami0Geoff Strange1David Baker2Rachael Cordina3Leeanne Grigg4David S. Celermajer5Calum Nicholson6Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia; Corresponding author.Heart Research Institute, Newtown, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, AustraliaRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, AustraliaRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, AustraliaRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, AustraliaSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia; Heart Research Institute, Newtown, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, AustraliaHeart Research Institute, Newtown, AustraliaBackground: Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) encompasses a huge variety of rare diagnoses that range in complexity and comorbidity. To help build clinical guidelines, plan health services and conduct statistically powerful research on such a disparate set of diseases there have been various attempts to group pathologies into mild, moderate, or severe disease. So far, however, these complexity scores have required manual specialist input for every case, and are therefore missing in large databases where this is impractical, or quickly outdated when guidelines are revised. Methods: We used the up-to-date European Society of Cardiology guidelines to create an algorithm to assign complexity scores to CHD patients using only their diagnosis list. Two CHD specialists then independently assigned complexity scores to a random sample of patients. Results: Our algorithm was 96% accurate where both specialists agreed on a complexity score; this occurred 68% of the time overall, and 79% of the time in moderate or complex CHD. The algorithm “failed” mainly when diagnoses were insufficiently specific, usually for septal defects (where size was unspecified), or where complexity depends on the procedure performed (e.g. atrial/arterial switch for transposition of the great arteries). Conclusions: We were able to algorithmically determine the complexity scores of a majority of patients with CHD based on their diagnosis list alone. This could allow for automatic complexity scoring of most patients in large CHD databases, for example our own Registry of the Congenital Heart Alliance of Australia and New Zealand. This will facilitate targeted research into the management, outcomes and burden of CHD.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666668522001136Adult congenital heart diseaseCongenital heart diseaseQuality of care
spellingShingle Jason Chami
Geoff Strange
David Baker
Rachael Cordina
Leeanne Grigg
David S. Celermajer
Calum Nicholson
Algorithmic complexity stratification for congenital heart disease patients
International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease
Adult congenital heart disease
Congenital heart disease
Quality of care
title Algorithmic complexity stratification for congenital heart disease patients
title_full Algorithmic complexity stratification for congenital heart disease patients
title_fullStr Algorithmic complexity stratification for congenital heart disease patients
title_full_unstemmed Algorithmic complexity stratification for congenital heart disease patients
title_short Algorithmic complexity stratification for congenital heart disease patients
title_sort algorithmic complexity stratification for congenital heart disease patients
topic Adult congenital heart disease
Congenital heart disease
Quality of care
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666668522001136
work_keys_str_mv AT jasonchami algorithmiccomplexitystratificationforcongenitalheartdiseasepatients
AT geoffstrange algorithmiccomplexitystratificationforcongenitalheartdiseasepatients
AT davidbaker algorithmiccomplexitystratificationforcongenitalheartdiseasepatients
AT rachaelcordina algorithmiccomplexitystratificationforcongenitalheartdiseasepatients
AT leeannegrigg algorithmiccomplexitystratificationforcongenitalheartdiseasepatients
AT davidscelermajer algorithmiccomplexitystratificationforcongenitalheartdiseasepatients
AT calumnicholson algorithmiccomplexitystratificationforcongenitalheartdiseasepatients