Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

Bianca Viljoen,1– 3 Suzanne K Chambers,1,2,4– 7 Jeff Dunn,1,2,4,5 Nicholas Ralph,1,3– 5 Sonja March1,8 1Centre for Health Research, Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Brisbane, Australia; 2Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Viljoen B, Chambers SK, Dunn J, Ralph N, March S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/deciding-to-enrol-in-a-cancer-trial-a-systematic-review-of-qualitative-peer-reviewed-article-JMDH
_version_ 1828957711525478400
author Viljoen B
Chambers SK
Dunn J
Ralph N
March S
author_facet Viljoen B
Chambers SK
Dunn J
Ralph N
March S
author_sort Viljoen B
collection DOAJ
description Bianca Viljoen,1– 3 Suzanne K Chambers,1,2,4– 7 Jeff Dunn,1,2,4,5 Nicholas Ralph,1,3– 5 Sonja March1,8 1Centre for Health Research, Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Brisbane, Australia; 2Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; 3School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia; 4Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 5Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer (ANZUP) Trials Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 6Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 7Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia; 8School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Brisbane, AustraliaCorrespondence: Nicholas RalphInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Brisbane, QLD 4350, AustraliaEmail nicholas.ralph@usq.edu.auBackground: Clinical trials are essential for the advancement of cancer treatments; however, participation by patients is suboptimal. Currently, there is a lack of synthesized qualitative review evidence on the patient experience of trial entry from which to further develop decision support. The aim of this review is to synthesise literature reporting experiences of participants when deciding to enrol in a cancer clinical trial in order to inform practice.Methods: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies were conducted to describe the experiences of adult cancer patients who decided to enrol in a clinical trial of an anti-cancer treatment.Results: Forty studies met eligibility criteria for inclusion. Three themes were identified representing the overarching domains of experience when deciding to enrol in a cancer trial: 1) need for trial information; (2) trepidation towards participation; and (3) justifying the decision. The process of deciding to enrol in a clinical trial is one marked by uncertainty, emotional distress and driven by the search for a cure.Conclusion: Findings from this review show that decision support modelled by shared decision-making and the quality of a shared decision needs to be accompanied by tailored or personalised psychosocial and supportive care. Although the decision process bears similarities to theoretical processes outlined in decision-making frameworks, there are a lack of supportive interventions for cancer patients that are adapted to the clinical trial context. Theory-based interventions are urgently required to support the specific needs of patients deciding whether to participate in cancer trials.Keywords: advanced cancer, qualitative, guideline development, consolidated framework for implementation research
first_indexed 2024-12-14T08:33:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-535d443bc0c54724b28d6c957bc66a96
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-2390
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T08:33:58Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
spelling doaj.art-535d443bc0c54724b28d6c957bc66a962022-12-21T23:09:27ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare1178-23902020-10-01Volume 131257128158523Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative StudiesViljoen BChambers SKDunn JRalph NMarch SBianca Viljoen,1– 3 Suzanne K Chambers,1,2,4– 7 Jeff Dunn,1,2,4,5 Nicholas Ralph,1,3– 5 Sonja March1,8 1Centre for Health Research, Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Brisbane, Australia; 2Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; 3School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia; 4Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 5Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer (ANZUP) Trials Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 6Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 7Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia; 8School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Brisbane, AustraliaCorrespondence: Nicholas RalphInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Brisbane, QLD 4350, AustraliaEmail nicholas.ralph@usq.edu.auBackground: Clinical trials are essential for the advancement of cancer treatments; however, participation by patients is suboptimal. Currently, there is a lack of synthesized qualitative review evidence on the patient experience of trial entry from which to further develop decision support. The aim of this review is to synthesise literature reporting experiences of participants when deciding to enrol in a cancer clinical trial in order to inform practice.Methods: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies were conducted to describe the experiences of adult cancer patients who decided to enrol in a clinical trial of an anti-cancer treatment.Results: Forty studies met eligibility criteria for inclusion. Three themes were identified representing the overarching domains of experience when deciding to enrol in a cancer trial: 1) need for trial information; (2) trepidation towards participation; and (3) justifying the decision. The process of deciding to enrol in a clinical trial is one marked by uncertainty, emotional distress and driven by the search for a cure.Conclusion: Findings from this review show that decision support modelled by shared decision-making and the quality of a shared decision needs to be accompanied by tailored or personalised psychosocial and supportive care. Although the decision process bears similarities to theoretical processes outlined in decision-making frameworks, there are a lack of supportive interventions for cancer patients that are adapted to the clinical trial context. Theory-based interventions are urgently required to support the specific needs of patients deciding whether to participate in cancer trials.Keywords: advanced cancer, qualitative, guideline development, consolidated framework for implementation researchhttps://www.dovepress.com/deciding-to-enrol-in-a-cancer-trial-a-systematic-review-of-qualitative-peer-reviewed-article-JMDHadvanced cancerqualitativeguideline developmentconsolidated framework for implementation research
spellingShingle Viljoen B
Chambers SK
Dunn J
Ralph N
March S
Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
advanced cancer
qualitative
guideline development
consolidated framework for implementation research
title Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
title_full Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
title_fullStr Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
title_full_unstemmed Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
title_short Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
title_sort deciding to enrol in a cancer trial a systematic review of qualitative studies
topic advanced cancer
qualitative
guideline development
consolidated framework for implementation research
url https://www.dovepress.com/deciding-to-enrol-in-a-cancer-trial-a-systematic-review-of-qualitative-peer-reviewed-article-JMDH
work_keys_str_mv AT viljoenb decidingtoenrolinacancertrialasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT chamberssk decidingtoenrolinacancertrialasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT dunnj decidingtoenrolinacancertrialasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT ralphn decidingtoenrolinacancertrialasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT marchs decidingtoenrolinacancertrialasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies