The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence

Fairness-related decision making is an important issue in the field of decision making. Traditional theories emphasize the roles of inequity aversion and reciprocity, whereas recent research increasingly shows that emotion plays a critical role in this type of decision making. In this review, we sum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ya Zheng, Zhong Yang, Chunlan Jin, Yue Qi, Xun Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01592/full
_version_ 1831707351681335296
author Ya Zheng
Zhong Yang
Zhong Yang
Chunlan Jin
Yue Qi
Yue Qi
Xun Liu
Xun Liu
author_facet Ya Zheng
Zhong Yang
Zhong Yang
Chunlan Jin
Yue Qi
Yue Qi
Xun Liu
Xun Liu
author_sort Ya Zheng
collection DOAJ
description Fairness-related decision making is an important issue in the field of decision making. Traditional theories emphasize the roles of inequity aversion and reciprocity, whereas recent research increasingly shows that emotion plays a critical role in this type of decision making. In this review, we summarize the influences of three types of emotions (i.e., the integral emotion experienced at the time of decision making, the incidental emotion aroused by a task-unrelated dispositional or situational source, and the interaction of emotion and cognition) on fairness-related decision making. Specifically, we first introduce three dominant theories that describe how emotion may influence fairness-related decision making (i.e., the wounded pride/spite model, affect infusion model, and dual-process model). Next, we collect behavioral and neural evidence for and against these theories. Finally, we propose that future research on fairness-related decision making should focus on inducing incidental social emotion, avoiding irrelevant emotion when regulating, exploring the individual differences in emotional dispositions, and strengthening the ecological validity of the paradigm.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T20:12:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-536831ce41954f5b921f0ad2ca8a1d01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T20:12:25Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-536831ce41954f5b921f0ad2ca8a1d012022-12-21T19:27:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782017-09-01810.3389/fpsyg.2017.01592279486The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and EvidenceYa Zheng0Zhong Yang1Zhong Yang2Chunlan Jin3Yue Qi4Yue Qi5Xun Liu6Xun Liu7Department of Psychology, Dalian Medical UniversityDalian, ChinaCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, ChinaDepartment of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, ChinaSchool of Foreign Languages, East China University of Science and TechnologyShanghai, ChinaCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, ChinaDepartment of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, ChinaCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, ChinaDepartment of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, ChinaFairness-related decision making is an important issue in the field of decision making. Traditional theories emphasize the roles of inequity aversion and reciprocity, whereas recent research increasingly shows that emotion plays a critical role in this type of decision making. In this review, we summarize the influences of three types of emotions (i.e., the integral emotion experienced at the time of decision making, the incidental emotion aroused by a task-unrelated dispositional or situational source, and the interaction of emotion and cognition) on fairness-related decision making. Specifically, we first introduce three dominant theories that describe how emotion may influence fairness-related decision making (i.e., the wounded pride/spite model, affect infusion model, and dual-process model). Next, we collect behavioral and neural evidence for and against these theories. Finally, we propose that future research on fairness-related decision making should focus on inducing incidental social emotion, avoiding irrelevant emotion when regulating, exploring the individual differences in emotional dispositions, and strengthening the ecological validity of the paradigm.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01592/fullemotionemotion regulationfairness-related decision makingfairness theoryneural mechanisms
spellingShingle Ya Zheng
Zhong Yang
Zhong Yang
Chunlan Jin
Yue Qi
Yue Qi
Xun Liu
Xun Liu
The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence
Frontiers in Psychology
emotion
emotion regulation
fairness-related decision making
fairness theory
neural mechanisms
title The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence
title_full The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence
title_fullStr The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence
title_short The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence
title_sort influence of emotion on fairness related decision making a critical review of theories and evidence
topic emotion
emotion regulation
fairness-related decision making
fairness theory
neural mechanisms
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01592/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yazheng theinfluenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT zhongyang theinfluenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT zhongyang theinfluenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT chunlanjin theinfluenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT yueqi theinfluenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT yueqi theinfluenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT xunliu theinfluenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT xunliu theinfluenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT yazheng influenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT zhongyang influenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT zhongyang influenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT chunlanjin influenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT yueqi influenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT yueqi influenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT xunliu influenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence
AT xunliu influenceofemotiononfairnessrelateddecisionmakingacriticalreviewoftheoriesandevidence