Constituting sources is a matter of correlational claims

Abstract This essay delves into the essentialities of object-giving sources within the formulation of epistemic objectivity. It explores the relationship between objectivity and intentional states, particularly in the context of immediate and transcendent experiences. A key focus of this paradigm is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kiran Pala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2023-12-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02363-w
_version_ 1797415689963700224
author Kiran Pala
author_facet Kiran Pala
author_sort Kiran Pala
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This essay delves into the essentialities of object-giving sources within the formulation of epistemic objectivity. It explores the relationship between objectivity and intentional states, particularly in the context of immediate and transcendent experiences. A key focus of this paradigm is the examination of inferences and how they are held in X’s intentional processes. These claims about inferences contribute to the perception of objectivity by highlighting the epistemological transitions of things that occur in the constitutive ideation. Additionally, the activity within X’s episteme leads to significant articulations that reflect a structural realism of experiences. The essay also introduces a convention of the experiential-intentional process so that the causality manipulations could be avoided by the precents of sources of ideation. In this instance, the central niche is occupied by transcendental reflections of intentionality, which are fundamentally founded on experiences and objectivity, and they possess a distinct rhetorical quality. They manifest as acts, propositional forms, and constituents, all of which contribute to the understanding and justification of objectivity. To establish such a framework that upholds objectivity, certain prerequisites must be met. Firstly, the framework must possess justificational resources that prevent causality manipulations. Secondly, pre-reflective sources should not inter-define causality in epistemic circumstances, although this does not exclude the emergence of causal relations, and thus this approach offers a correlational explanation. Lastly, transcendental reflections should remain compatible with the experiential-intentional process, allowing for the accommodation of subjectivity in the justification of objectivity.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:53:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-537b2714930741b4875b0061d1d0fc6a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2662-9992
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:53:08Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
spelling doaj.art-537b2714930741b4875b0061d1d0fc6a2023-12-03T12:15:40ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922023-12-0110111110.1057/s41599-023-02363-wConstituting sources is a matter of correlational claimsKiran Pala0University of Eastern FinlandAbstract This essay delves into the essentialities of object-giving sources within the formulation of epistemic objectivity. It explores the relationship between objectivity and intentional states, particularly in the context of immediate and transcendent experiences. A key focus of this paradigm is the examination of inferences and how they are held in X’s intentional processes. These claims about inferences contribute to the perception of objectivity by highlighting the epistemological transitions of things that occur in the constitutive ideation. Additionally, the activity within X’s episteme leads to significant articulations that reflect a structural realism of experiences. The essay also introduces a convention of the experiential-intentional process so that the causality manipulations could be avoided by the precents of sources of ideation. In this instance, the central niche is occupied by transcendental reflections of intentionality, which are fundamentally founded on experiences and objectivity, and they possess a distinct rhetorical quality. They manifest as acts, propositional forms, and constituents, all of which contribute to the understanding and justification of objectivity. To establish such a framework that upholds objectivity, certain prerequisites must be met. Firstly, the framework must possess justificational resources that prevent causality manipulations. Secondly, pre-reflective sources should not inter-define causality in epistemic circumstances, although this does not exclude the emergence of causal relations, and thus this approach offers a correlational explanation. Lastly, transcendental reflections should remain compatible with the experiential-intentional process, allowing for the accommodation of subjectivity in the justification of objectivity.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02363-w
spellingShingle Kiran Pala
Constituting sources is a matter of correlational claims
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
title Constituting sources is a matter of correlational claims
title_full Constituting sources is a matter of correlational claims
title_fullStr Constituting sources is a matter of correlational claims
title_full_unstemmed Constituting sources is a matter of correlational claims
title_short Constituting sources is a matter of correlational claims
title_sort constituting sources is a matter of correlational claims
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02363-w
work_keys_str_mv AT kiranpala constitutingsourcesisamatterofcorrelationalclaims