Economic evaluations of radioembolization with Itrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review

Abstract Background Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 microspheres is a clinically effective therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the available economic evaluations of TARE for the treatment of HCC. Methods The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. C. Alonso, I. Casans, F. M. González, D. Fuster, A. Rodríguez, N. Sánchez, I. Oyagüez, R. Burgos, A. O. Williams, N. Espinoza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-07-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02396-6
_version_ 1818470948066557952
author J. C. Alonso
I. Casans
F. M. González
D. Fuster
A. Rodríguez
N. Sánchez
I. Oyagüez
R. Burgos
A. O. Williams
N. Espinoza
author_facet J. C. Alonso
I. Casans
F. M. González
D. Fuster
A. Rodríguez
N. Sánchez
I. Oyagüez
R. Burgos
A. O. Williams
N. Espinoza
author_sort J. C. Alonso
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 microspheres is a clinically effective therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the available economic evaluations of TARE for the treatment of HCC. Methods The Preferred Reported Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was followed by applying a search strategy across six databases. All studies identified as economic evaluations with TARE for HCC treatment in English or Spanish language were considered. Costs were adjusted using the 2020 US dollars based on purchasing-power-parity ($US PPP). Results Among 423 records screened, 20 studies (6 cost-analyses, 3 budget-impact-analyses, 2 cost-effectiveness-analyses, 8 cost-utility-analyses, and 1 cost-minimization analysis) met the pre-defined criteria for inclusion. Thirteen studies were published from the European perspective, six from the United States, and one from the Canadian perspectives. The assessed populations included early- (n = 4), and intermediate-advanced-stages patients (n = 15). Included studies were evaluated from a payer perspective (n = 20) and included both payer and social perspective (n = 2). TARE was compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in nine studies or sorafenib (n = 11). The life-years gained (LYG) differed by comparator: TARE versus TACE (range: 1.3 to 3.1), and TARE versus sorafenib (range: 1.1 to 2.53). Of the 20 studies, TARE was associated with lower treatment costs in ten studies. The cost of TARE treatment varied widely according to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system and ranged from 1311 $US PPP/month (BCLC-A) to 71,890 $US PPP/5-years time horizon (BCLC-C). The incremental cost-utility ratio for TARE versus TACE resulted in a 17,397 $US PPP/Quality-adjusted-Life-Years (QALY), and for TARE versus sorafenib ranged from dominant (more effectiveness and lower cost) to 3363 $US PPP/QALY. Conclusions Economic evaluations of TARE for HCC treatment are heterogeneous. Overall, TARE is a cost-effective short- and long-term therapy for the treatment of intermediate-advanced HCC.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T21:44:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-53837ac4e62c4c35ac4e7afc87b1ebfb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-230X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T21:44:23Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-53837ac4e62c4c35ac4e7afc87b1ebfb2022-12-22T02:28:38ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2022-07-0122112310.1186/s12876-022-02396-6Economic evaluations of radioembolization with Itrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic reviewJ. C. Alonso0I. Casans1F. M. González2D. Fuster3A. Rodríguez4N. Sánchez5I. Oyagüez6R. Burgos7A. O. Williams8N. Espinoza9Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Gregorio MarañónNuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico UniversitarioNuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario CentralNuclear Medicine Department, Hospital ClinicNuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Virgen de las NievesNuclear Medicine Department, Hospital ClinicPharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB)Boston Scientific IberiaBoston ScientificPharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB)Abstract Background Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 microspheres is a clinically effective therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the available economic evaluations of TARE for the treatment of HCC. Methods The Preferred Reported Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was followed by applying a search strategy across six databases. All studies identified as economic evaluations with TARE for HCC treatment in English or Spanish language were considered. Costs were adjusted using the 2020 US dollars based on purchasing-power-parity ($US PPP). Results Among 423 records screened, 20 studies (6 cost-analyses, 3 budget-impact-analyses, 2 cost-effectiveness-analyses, 8 cost-utility-analyses, and 1 cost-minimization analysis) met the pre-defined criteria for inclusion. Thirteen studies were published from the European perspective, six from the United States, and one from the Canadian perspectives. The assessed populations included early- (n = 4), and intermediate-advanced-stages patients (n = 15). Included studies were evaluated from a payer perspective (n = 20) and included both payer and social perspective (n = 2). TARE was compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in nine studies or sorafenib (n = 11). The life-years gained (LYG) differed by comparator: TARE versus TACE (range: 1.3 to 3.1), and TARE versus sorafenib (range: 1.1 to 2.53). Of the 20 studies, TARE was associated with lower treatment costs in ten studies. The cost of TARE treatment varied widely according to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system and ranged from 1311 $US PPP/month (BCLC-A) to 71,890 $US PPP/5-years time horizon (BCLC-C). The incremental cost-utility ratio for TARE versus TACE resulted in a 17,397 $US PPP/Quality-adjusted-Life-Years (QALY), and for TARE versus sorafenib ranged from dominant (more effectiveness and lower cost) to 3363 $US PPP/QALY. Conclusions Economic evaluations of TARE for HCC treatment are heterogeneous. Overall, TARE is a cost-effective short- and long-term therapy for the treatment of intermediate-advanced HCC.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02396-6CarcinomaHepatocellularLiver neoplasmsRadiotherapyYttrium-90Cost
spellingShingle J. C. Alonso
I. Casans
F. M. González
D. Fuster
A. Rodríguez
N. Sánchez
I. Oyagüez
R. Burgos
A. O. Williams
N. Espinoza
Economic evaluations of radioembolization with Itrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review
BMC Gastroenterology
Carcinoma
Hepatocellular
Liver neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Yttrium-90
Cost
title Economic evaluations of radioembolization with Itrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review
title_full Economic evaluations of radioembolization with Itrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review
title_fullStr Economic evaluations of radioembolization with Itrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluations of radioembolization with Itrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review
title_short Economic evaluations of radioembolization with Itrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review
title_sort economic evaluations of radioembolization with itrium 90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma a systematic review
topic Carcinoma
Hepatocellular
Liver neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Yttrium-90
Cost
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02396-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jcalonso economicevaluationsofradioembolizationwithitrium90microspheresinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview
AT icasans economicevaluationsofradioembolizationwithitrium90microspheresinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview
AT fmgonzalez economicevaluationsofradioembolizationwithitrium90microspheresinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview
AT dfuster economicevaluationsofradioembolizationwithitrium90microspheresinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview
AT arodriguez economicevaluationsofradioembolizationwithitrium90microspheresinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview
AT nsanchez economicevaluationsofradioembolizationwithitrium90microspheresinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview
AT ioyaguez economicevaluationsofradioembolizationwithitrium90microspheresinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview
AT rburgos economicevaluationsofradioembolizationwithitrium90microspheresinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview
AT aowilliams economicevaluationsofradioembolizationwithitrium90microspheresinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview
AT nespinoza economicevaluationsofradioembolizationwithitrium90microspheresinhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreview