Adhesive strips as the sole method for skin closure is effective in total knee arthroplasty

Objective: Adhesive strips are used as the sole method for skin closure in many operations except total knee arthroplasty. The claims are decreased wound closure time, less tissue reaction, and lack of stitch marks. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of closure using adhesive stri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Varah Yuenyongviwat, Khanin Iamthanaporn, Pakjai Tuntarattanapong, Kantapon Dissaneewate, Preyanun Tangjatsakow, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Theerawit Hongnaparak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-09-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019873983
_version_ 1831703463283654656
author Varah Yuenyongviwat
Khanin Iamthanaporn
Pakjai Tuntarattanapong
Kantapon Dissaneewate
Preyanun Tangjatsakow
Wongthawat Liawrungrueang
Theerawit Hongnaparak
author_facet Varah Yuenyongviwat
Khanin Iamthanaporn
Pakjai Tuntarattanapong
Kantapon Dissaneewate
Preyanun Tangjatsakow
Wongthawat Liawrungrueang
Theerawit Hongnaparak
author_sort Varah Yuenyongviwat
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Adhesive strips are used as the sole method for skin closure in many operations except total knee arthroplasty. The claims are decreased wound closure time, less tissue reaction, and lack of stitch marks. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of closure using adhesive strips versus running subcuticular stitches. Methods: This study was a retrospective case-matched study. Running subcuticular stitches or adhesive strips were used for skin closure in 151 and 137 patients, respectively. All of the patients had an operation by a single surgeon and had the same patient care protocol. All of the patients were evaluated postoperatively for wound complication at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months follow-up. Results: The wounds of most patients in both groups had healed. The incidence of superficial infection was not different between the groups (1.32% in the running subcuticular suture group and 1.46% in the adhesive strip group) ( p = 0.92). One case (0.66%) in the running subcuticular suture group had deep infection, which required reoperation ( p = 0.34). The patients in the running subcuticular suture group had higher unabsorbable sutures, which required further removal compared to the adhesive strip group ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of adhesive strips is an effective skin closure method with a low rate of infection and skin complications. This technique is easy and there is no need for suture removal. Furthermore, there are no stitch marks and the cost of suturing is lower.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T15:40:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-53a4da5fc7064aafa8d9b2d74a26e670
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2309-4990
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T15:40:49Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-53a4da5fc7064aafa8d9b2d74a26e6702022-12-21T19:35:11ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902019-09-012710.1177/2309499019873983Adhesive strips as the sole method for skin closure is effective in total knee arthroplastyVarah YuenyongviwatKhanin IamthanapornPakjai TuntarattanapongKantapon DissaneewatePreyanun TangjatsakowWongthawat LiawrungrueangTheerawit HongnaparakObjective: Adhesive strips are used as the sole method for skin closure in many operations except total knee arthroplasty. The claims are decreased wound closure time, less tissue reaction, and lack of stitch marks. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of closure using adhesive strips versus running subcuticular stitches. Methods: This study was a retrospective case-matched study. Running subcuticular stitches or adhesive strips were used for skin closure in 151 and 137 patients, respectively. All of the patients had an operation by a single surgeon and had the same patient care protocol. All of the patients were evaluated postoperatively for wound complication at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months follow-up. Results: The wounds of most patients in both groups had healed. The incidence of superficial infection was not different between the groups (1.32% in the running subcuticular suture group and 1.46% in the adhesive strip group) ( p = 0.92). One case (0.66%) in the running subcuticular suture group had deep infection, which required reoperation ( p = 0.34). The patients in the running subcuticular suture group had higher unabsorbable sutures, which required further removal compared to the adhesive strip group ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of adhesive strips is an effective skin closure method with a low rate of infection and skin complications. This technique is easy and there is no need for suture removal. Furthermore, there are no stitch marks and the cost of suturing is lower.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019873983
spellingShingle Varah Yuenyongviwat
Khanin Iamthanaporn
Pakjai Tuntarattanapong
Kantapon Dissaneewate
Preyanun Tangjatsakow
Wongthawat Liawrungrueang
Theerawit Hongnaparak
Adhesive strips as the sole method for skin closure is effective in total knee arthroplasty
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
title Adhesive strips as the sole method for skin closure is effective in total knee arthroplasty
title_full Adhesive strips as the sole method for skin closure is effective in total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr Adhesive strips as the sole method for skin closure is effective in total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Adhesive strips as the sole method for skin closure is effective in total knee arthroplasty
title_short Adhesive strips as the sole method for skin closure is effective in total knee arthroplasty
title_sort adhesive strips as the sole method for skin closure is effective in total knee arthroplasty
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019873983
work_keys_str_mv AT varahyuenyongviwat adhesivestripsasthesolemethodforskinclosureiseffectiveintotalkneearthroplasty
AT khaniniamthanaporn adhesivestripsasthesolemethodforskinclosureiseffectiveintotalkneearthroplasty
AT pakjaituntarattanapong adhesivestripsasthesolemethodforskinclosureiseffectiveintotalkneearthroplasty
AT kantapondissaneewate adhesivestripsasthesolemethodforskinclosureiseffectiveintotalkneearthroplasty
AT preyanuntangjatsakow adhesivestripsasthesolemethodforskinclosureiseffectiveintotalkneearthroplasty
AT wongthawatliawrungrueang adhesivestripsasthesolemethodforskinclosureiseffectiveintotalkneearthroplasty
AT theerawithongnaparak adhesivestripsasthesolemethodforskinclosureiseffectiveintotalkneearthroplasty