Digital rectal grading of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Where does it stand today?

Background: Despite the fact that digital rectal examination (DRE) is an integral part of medical teaching curriculum, there is lack of standardized grading system for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that can be followed uniformly. Aims: To evaluate the validity of digital rectal grading for the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bijit Lodh, Rajendra Singh Sinam, Kaku Akoijam Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmgims.co.in/article.asp?issn=0971-9903;year=2016;volume=21;issue=1;spage=40;epage=45;aulast=Lodh
_version_ 1818427592967979008
author Bijit Lodh
Rajendra Singh Sinam
Kaku Akoijam Singh
author_facet Bijit Lodh
Rajendra Singh Sinam
Kaku Akoijam Singh
author_sort Bijit Lodh
collection DOAJ
description Background: Despite the fact that digital rectal examination (DRE) is an integral part of medical teaching curriculum, there is lack of standardized grading system for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that can be followed uniformly. Aims: To evaluate the validity of digital rectal grading for the assessment of prostate volume, in view to improve its reproducibility. Materials and Methods: This study was carried out in 150 eligible patients of BPH. Based on DRE the prostate enlargement was stratified into four grades. The degree of agreement between the expected prostate volume and measured prostate volume against each digital rectal grade were analyzed using Scatter plots. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: The digital rectal Grades I-IV correlates well with transrectal ultrasound measurement and roughly corresponds to a volume of 27.78 ± 2.55 ml, 40.54 ± 7.69 ml, 61.08 ± 11.90 ml and 98.42 ± 23.44 ml, respectively. The expected prostate volume in digital rectal Grade II (30-50 ml) showed an underestimation and overestimation by 4.76% and 7.94%, respectively. Similarly, Grade III (expected 50-85 ml) and IV (expected >85 ml) showed overestimation by 22.50% and 23.08% respectively. The Cronbach′s coefficient showed good internal consistency (α = 0. 851). Conclusions: Our attempt for standardization of the digital rectal grading satisfactorily validated in the clinical setting. It is feasibly sufficient to provide a rough estimation of the prostate volume and to classify patients with BPH.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T14:48:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-53a91ed46b4a44a8a375f0746e12ad10
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0971-9903
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T14:48:11Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-53a91ed46b4a44a8a375f0746e12ad102022-12-21T22:57:13ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences0971-99032016-01-01211404510.4103/0971-9903.178104Digital rectal grading of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Where does it stand today?Bijit LodhRajendra Singh SinamKaku Akoijam SinghBackground: Despite the fact that digital rectal examination (DRE) is an integral part of medical teaching curriculum, there is lack of standardized grading system for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that can be followed uniformly. Aims: To evaluate the validity of digital rectal grading for the assessment of prostate volume, in view to improve its reproducibility. Materials and Methods: This study was carried out in 150 eligible patients of BPH. Based on DRE the prostate enlargement was stratified into four grades. The degree of agreement between the expected prostate volume and measured prostate volume against each digital rectal grade were analyzed using Scatter plots. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: The digital rectal Grades I-IV correlates well with transrectal ultrasound measurement and roughly corresponds to a volume of 27.78 ± 2.55 ml, 40.54 ± 7.69 ml, 61.08 ± 11.90 ml and 98.42 ± 23.44 ml, respectively. The expected prostate volume in digital rectal Grade II (30-50 ml) showed an underestimation and overestimation by 4.76% and 7.94%, respectively. Similarly, Grade III (expected 50-85 ml) and IV (expected >85 ml) showed overestimation by 22.50% and 23.08% respectively. The Cronbach′s coefficient showed good internal consistency (α = 0. 851). Conclusions: Our attempt for standardization of the digital rectal grading satisfactorily validated in the clinical setting. It is feasibly sufficient to provide a rough estimation of the prostate volume and to classify patients with BPH.http://www.jmgims.co.in/article.asp?issn=0971-9903;year=2016;volume=21;issue=1;spage=40;epage=45;aulast=LodhBenign prostatic hyperplasiadigital rectal examinationgradestransrectal ultrasound
spellingShingle Bijit Lodh
Rajendra Singh Sinam
Kaku Akoijam Singh
Digital rectal grading of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Where does it stand today?
Journal of Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
digital rectal examination
grades
transrectal ultrasound
title Digital rectal grading of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Where does it stand today?
title_full Digital rectal grading of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Where does it stand today?
title_fullStr Digital rectal grading of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Where does it stand today?
title_full_unstemmed Digital rectal grading of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Where does it stand today?
title_short Digital rectal grading of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Where does it stand today?
title_sort digital rectal grading of benign prostatic hyperplasia where does it stand today
topic Benign prostatic hyperplasia
digital rectal examination
grades
transrectal ultrasound
url http://www.jmgims.co.in/article.asp?issn=0971-9903;year=2016;volume=21;issue=1;spage=40;epage=45;aulast=Lodh
work_keys_str_mv AT bijitlodh digitalrectalgradingofbenignprostatichyperplasiawheredoesitstandtoday
AT rajendrasinghsinam digitalrectalgradingofbenignprostatichyperplasiawheredoesitstandtoday
AT kakuakoijamsingh digitalrectalgradingofbenignprostatichyperplasiawheredoesitstandtoday