Emotions in Intergroup Contact: Incidental and Integral Emotions' Effects on Interethnic Bias Are Moderated by Emotion Applicability and Subjective Agency

This research draws from three distinct lines of research on the link between emotions and intergroup bias as springboard to integrative, new hypotheses. Past research suggests that emotions extrinsic to the outgroup (or “incidental”), and intrinsic to the outgroup (or “integral”), produce valence-c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefania Paolini, Jake Harwood, Aleksandra Logatchova, Mark Rubin, Matylda Mackiewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588944/full
_version_ 1818646933782134784
author Stefania Paolini
Jake Harwood
Aleksandra Logatchova
Mark Rubin
Matylda Mackiewicz
author_facet Stefania Paolini
Jake Harwood
Aleksandra Logatchova
Mark Rubin
Matylda Mackiewicz
author_sort Stefania Paolini
collection DOAJ
description This research draws from three distinct lines of research on the link between emotions and intergroup bias as springboard to integrative, new hypotheses. Past research suggests that emotions extrinsic to the outgroup (or “incidental”), and intrinsic to the outgroup (or “integral”), produce valence-congruent effects on intergroup bias when relevant or “applicable” to the outgroup (e.g., incidental/integral anger and ethnic outgroups). These emotions produce valence incongruent effects when irrelevant or “non-applicable” to the outgroup (e.g., incidental/integral sadness and happiness, and ethnic outgroups). Internally valid and ecologically sound tests of these contrasting effects are missing; hence we examined them experimentally in meaningful settings of interethnic contact. To this end, we hybridized established research paradigms in mood and intergroup contact research; this approach enabled us to use same materials and induction methods to instigate incidental and integral emotions in a single research design. In Experiment 1, White Australian students (N = 93) in in vivo real face-to-face contact with an ethnic tutor in their classroom displayed less interethnic bias when incidentally sad (vs. happy) or integrally happy (vs. sad). In Experiment 2, White American males' (N = 492) anti-Arab bias displayed divergent effects under incidental vs. integral (non-applicable) sadness/happiness and similar effects under incidental vs. integral (applicable) anger. The role of perceptions of agency in the emotion-inducing situation is also explored, tested, and explained drawing from mainstream emotion theory. As expected, integral and incidental applicable emotions caused valence congruent effects, at the opposite sides of the subjective agency spectrum, by encouraging the generalization of dislike from the outgroup contact partner to the outgroup as a whole. On the other hand, incidental-non-applicable emotions caused valence-incongruent effects on bias, under high agency conditions, by encouraging (non-partner-centered) heuristic processing. Because of the improved methodology, these effects can be regarded as genuine and not the byproduct of methodological artifacts. This theory-driven and empirically sound analysis of the interplay between emotion source, emotion applicability and subjective agency in intergroup contact can increase the precision of emotion-based bias reduction strategies by deepening understanding of the emotion conditions that lead to intergroup bias attenuation vs. exacerbation.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T00:54:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-53ac9ce329b142c9815c9a92f9799dea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T00:54:31Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-53ac9ce329b142c9815c9a92f9799dea2022-12-21T22:09:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-05-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.588944588944Emotions in Intergroup Contact: Incidental and Integral Emotions' Effects on Interethnic Bias Are Moderated by Emotion Applicability and Subjective AgencyStefania Paolini0Jake Harwood1Aleksandra Logatchova2Mark Rubin3Matylda Mackiewicz4School of Psychology, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaDepartment of Communication, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United StatesSchool of Psychology, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Psychology, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Psychology, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaThis research draws from three distinct lines of research on the link between emotions and intergroup bias as springboard to integrative, new hypotheses. Past research suggests that emotions extrinsic to the outgroup (or “incidental”), and intrinsic to the outgroup (or “integral”), produce valence-congruent effects on intergroup bias when relevant or “applicable” to the outgroup (e.g., incidental/integral anger and ethnic outgroups). These emotions produce valence incongruent effects when irrelevant or “non-applicable” to the outgroup (e.g., incidental/integral sadness and happiness, and ethnic outgroups). Internally valid and ecologically sound tests of these contrasting effects are missing; hence we examined them experimentally in meaningful settings of interethnic contact. To this end, we hybridized established research paradigms in mood and intergroup contact research; this approach enabled us to use same materials and induction methods to instigate incidental and integral emotions in a single research design. In Experiment 1, White Australian students (N = 93) in in vivo real face-to-face contact with an ethnic tutor in their classroom displayed less interethnic bias when incidentally sad (vs. happy) or integrally happy (vs. sad). In Experiment 2, White American males' (N = 492) anti-Arab bias displayed divergent effects under incidental vs. integral (non-applicable) sadness/happiness and similar effects under incidental vs. integral (applicable) anger. The role of perceptions of agency in the emotion-inducing situation is also explored, tested, and explained drawing from mainstream emotion theory. As expected, integral and incidental applicable emotions caused valence congruent effects, at the opposite sides of the subjective agency spectrum, by encouraging the generalization of dislike from the outgroup contact partner to the outgroup as a whole. On the other hand, incidental-non-applicable emotions caused valence-incongruent effects on bias, under high agency conditions, by encouraging (non-partner-centered) heuristic processing. Because of the improved methodology, these effects can be regarded as genuine and not the byproduct of methodological artifacts. This theory-driven and empirically sound analysis of the interplay between emotion source, emotion applicability and subjective agency in intergroup contact can increase the precision of emotion-based bias reduction strategies by deepening understanding of the emotion conditions that lead to intergroup bias attenuation vs. exacerbation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588944/fullintergroup contactperceived agencyemotion sourceemotion applicabilityintergroup biasincidental emotion
spellingShingle Stefania Paolini
Jake Harwood
Aleksandra Logatchova
Mark Rubin
Matylda Mackiewicz
Emotions in Intergroup Contact: Incidental and Integral Emotions' Effects on Interethnic Bias Are Moderated by Emotion Applicability and Subjective Agency
Frontiers in Psychology
intergroup contact
perceived agency
emotion source
emotion applicability
intergroup bias
incidental emotion
title Emotions in Intergroup Contact: Incidental and Integral Emotions' Effects on Interethnic Bias Are Moderated by Emotion Applicability and Subjective Agency
title_full Emotions in Intergroup Contact: Incidental and Integral Emotions' Effects on Interethnic Bias Are Moderated by Emotion Applicability and Subjective Agency
title_fullStr Emotions in Intergroup Contact: Incidental and Integral Emotions' Effects on Interethnic Bias Are Moderated by Emotion Applicability and Subjective Agency
title_full_unstemmed Emotions in Intergroup Contact: Incidental and Integral Emotions' Effects on Interethnic Bias Are Moderated by Emotion Applicability and Subjective Agency
title_short Emotions in Intergroup Contact: Incidental and Integral Emotions' Effects on Interethnic Bias Are Moderated by Emotion Applicability and Subjective Agency
title_sort emotions in intergroup contact incidental and integral emotions effects on interethnic bias are moderated by emotion applicability and subjective agency
topic intergroup contact
perceived agency
emotion source
emotion applicability
intergroup bias
incidental emotion
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588944/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stefaniapaolini emotionsinintergroupcontactincidentalandintegralemotionseffectsoninterethnicbiasaremoderatedbyemotionapplicabilityandsubjectiveagency
AT jakeharwood emotionsinintergroupcontactincidentalandintegralemotionseffectsoninterethnicbiasaremoderatedbyemotionapplicabilityandsubjectiveagency
AT aleksandralogatchova emotionsinintergroupcontactincidentalandintegralemotionseffectsoninterethnicbiasaremoderatedbyemotionapplicabilityandsubjectiveagency
AT markrubin emotionsinintergroupcontactincidentalandintegralemotionseffectsoninterethnicbiasaremoderatedbyemotionapplicabilityandsubjectiveagency
AT matyldamackiewicz emotionsinintergroupcontactincidentalandintegralemotionseffectsoninterethnicbiasaremoderatedbyemotionapplicabilityandsubjectiveagency