Transparency Assessment on Level 2 Automated Vehicle HMIs

The responsibility and role of human drivers during automated driving might change dynamically. In such cases, human-machine interface (HMI) transparency becomes crucial to facilitate driving safety, as the states of the automated vehicle have to be communicated correctly and efficiently. However, t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuan-Cheng Liu, Nikol Figalová, Klaus Bengler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Information
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/13/10/489
_version_ 1797431551607177216
author Yuan-Cheng Liu
Nikol Figalová
Klaus Bengler
author_facet Yuan-Cheng Liu
Nikol Figalová
Klaus Bengler
author_sort Yuan-Cheng Liu
collection DOAJ
description The responsibility and role of human drivers during automated driving might change dynamically. In such cases, human-machine interface (HMI) transparency becomes crucial to facilitate driving safety, as the states of the automated vehicle have to be communicated correctly and efficiently. However, there is no standardized transparency assessment method to evaluate the understanding of human drivers toward the HMI. In this study, we defined functional transparency (FT) and, based on this definition, proposed a transparency assessment method as a preliminary step toward the objective measurement for HMI understanding. The proposed method was verified in an online survey where HMIs of different vehicle manufacturers were adopted and their transparencies assessed. Even though no significant result was found among HMI designs, FT was found to be significantly higher for participants more experienced with SAE Level 2 automated vehicles, suggesting that more experienced users understand the HMIs better. Further identification tests revealed that more icons in BMW’s and VW’s HMI designs were correctly used to evaluate the state of longitudinal and lateral control. This study provides a novel method for assessing transparency and minimizing confusion during automated driving, which could greatly assist the HMI design process in the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:45:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-53af0ce3934c4d30b1c196c16ed2cffc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2078-2489
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:45:43Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Information
spelling doaj.art-53af0ce3934c4d30b1c196c16ed2cffc2023-12-02T00:33:04ZengMDPI AGInformation2078-24892022-10-01131048910.3390/info13100489Transparency Assessment on Level 2 Automated Vehicle HMIsYuan-Cheng Liu0Nikol Figalová1Klaus Bengler2Chair of Ergonomics, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, GermanyClinical and Health Psychology, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 41, 89069 Ulm, GermanyChair of Ergonomics, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, GermanyThe responsibility and role of human drivers during automated driving might change dynamically. In such cases, human-machine interface (HMI) transparency becomes crucial to facilitate driving safety, as the states of the automated vehicle have to be communicated correctly and efficiently. However, there is no standardized transparency assessment method to evaluate the understanding of human drivers toward the HMI. In this study, we defined functional transparency (FT) and, based on this definition, proposed a transparency assessment method as a preliminary step toward the objective measurement for HMI understanding. The proposed method was verified in an online survey where HMIs of different vehicle manufacturers were adopted and their transparencies assessed. Even though no significant result was found among HMI designs, FT was found to be significantly higher for participants more experienced with SAE Level 2 automated vehicles, suggesting that more experienced users understand the HMIs better. Further identification tests revealed that more icons in BMW’s and VW’s HMI designs were correctly used to evaluate the state of longitudinal and lateral control. This study provides a novel method for assessing transparency and minimizing confusion during automated driving, which could greatly assist the HMI design process in the future.https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/13/10/489automated drivinghuman-machine interfacetransparencyassessment method
spellingShingle Yuan-Cheng Liu
Nikol Figalová
Klaus Bengler
Transparency Assessment on Level 2 Automated Vehicle HMIs
Information
automated driving
human-machine interface
transparency
assessment method
title Transparency Assessment on Level 2 Automated Vehicle HMIs
title_full Transparency Assessment on Level 2 Automated Vehicle HMIs
title_fullStr Transparency Assessment on Level 2 Automated Vehicle HMIs
title_full_unstemmed Transparency Assessment on Level 2 Automated Vehicle HMIs
title_short Transparency Assessment on Level 2 Automated Vehicle HMIs
title_sort transparency assessment on level 2 automated vehicle hmis
topic automated driving
human-machine interface
transparency
assessment method
url https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/13/10/489
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanchengliu transparencyassessmentonlevel2automatedvehiclehmis
AT nikolfigalova transparencyassessmentonlevel2automatedvehiclehmis
AT klausbengler transparencyassessmentonlevel2automatedvehiclehmis