Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017

Mega-journals are a new kind of scholarly journal made possible by electronic publishing. They are open access (OA) and funded by charges, which authors pay for the publishing services. What distinguishes mega-journals from other OA journals is, in particular, a peer review focusing only on scientif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bo-Christer Björk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2018-02-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/4357.pdf
_version_ 1827610674440699904
author Bo-Christer Björk
author_facet Bo-Christer Björk
author_sort Bo-Christer Björk
collection DOAJ
description Mega-journals are a new kind of scholarly journal made possible by electronic publishing. They are open access (OA) and funded by charges, which authors pay for the publishing services. What distinguishes mega-journals from other OA journals is, in particular, a peer review focusing only on scientific trustworthiness. The journals can easily publish thousands of articles per year and there is no need to filter articles due to restricted slots in the publishing schedule. This study updates some earlier longitudinal studies of the evolution of mega-journals and their publication volumes. After very rapid growth in 2010–2013, the increase in overall article volumes has slowed down. Mega-journals are also increasingly dependent for sustained growth on Chinese authors, who now contribute 25% of all articles in such journals. There has also been an internal shift in market shares. PLOS ONE, which totally dominated mega-journal publishing in the early years, currently publishes around one-third of all articles. Scientific Reports has grown rapidly since 2014 and is now the biggest journal.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T07:53:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-53b4abb78c524bf7a0220b370480377c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T07:53:31Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-53b4abb78c524bf7a0220b370480377c2023-12-03T01:19:50ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592018-02-016e435710.7717/peerj.4357Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017Bo-Christer Björk0Information Systems Science, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, FinlandMega-journals are a new kind of scholarly journal made possible by electronic publishing. They are open access (OA) and funded by charges, which authors pay for the publishing services. What distinguishes mega-journals from other OA journals is, in particular, a peer review focusing only on scientific trustworthiness. The journals can easily publish thousands of articles per year and there is no need to filter articles due to restricted slots in the publishing schedule. This study updates some earlier longitudinal studies of the evolution of mega-journals and their publication volumes. After very rapid growth in 2010–2013, the increase in overall article volumes has slowed down. Mega-journals are also increasingly dependent for sustained growth on Chinese authors, who now contribute 25% of all articles in such journals. There has also been an internal shift in market shares. PLOS ONE, which totally dominated mega-journal publishing in the early years, currently publishes around one-third of all articles. Scientific Reports has grown rapidly since 2014 and is now the biggest journal.https://peerj.com/articles/4357.pdfOpen AccessScholarly publishing
spellingShingle Bo-Christer Björk
Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017
PeerJ
Open Access
Scholarly publishing
title Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017
title_full Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017
title_fullStr Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017
title_short Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017
title_sort evolution of the scholarly mega journal 2006 2017
topic Open Access
Scholarly publishing
url https://peerj.com/articles/4357.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bochristerbjork evolutionofthescholarlymegajournal20062017