Nurses’ Influenza Vaccination and Hesitancy: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature

Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is defined as “<i>delaying or refusing a secure vaccine despite its availability</i>”. This hesitancy affects caregivers and more specifically nurses. The purpose of this study is to assess determinants of influenza VH in the nurse’s community. We conducted a syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natacha Pinatel, Catherine Plotton, Bruno Pozzetto, Xavier Gocko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Vaccines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/7/997
_version_ 1797443289012502528
author Natacha Pinatel
Catherine Plotton
Bruno Pozzetto
Xavier Gocko
author_facet Natacha Pinatel
Catherine Plotton
Bruno Pozzetto
Xavier Gocko
author_sort Natacha Pinatel
collection DOAJ
description Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is defined as “<i>delaying or refusing a secure vaccine despite its availability</i>”. This hesitancy affects caregivers and more specifically nurses. The purpose of this study is to assess determinants of influenza VH in the nurse’s community. We conducted a systematic review of qualitative literature according to criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the synthesis of Qualitative Research from 2009 until October 2020. Eleven qualitative studies analysed (ten thematic content analyses and one grounded theory method) found three main factors in VH. The first determinant was the benefit–risk equation considered as unfavourable due to an ineffective vaccine and fears about adverse effects as the pain of the injection. Wrong immunological beliefs brought into hesitancy. Disease barriers (hand washing and masks) and personal immunity were regarded as more effective than the vaccine. Lastly, dehumanised vaccination and the difficulties of access to healthcare were institutional determinants. Nurses ask for a vaccine promotion by hierarchy and doctors with transparent information and respect for autonomy. The availability of vaccines and methods of pain control seem to be some tracks to reduce nurses’ VH.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T12:53:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-53b65664266c451085431126a909e862
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-393X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T12:53:49Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Vaccines
spelling doaj.art-53b65664266c451085431126a909e8622023-11-30T22:02:17ZengMDPI AGVaccines2076-393X2022-06-0110799710.3390/vaccines10070997Nurses’ Influenza Vaccination and Hesitancy: A Systematic Review of Qualitative LiteratureNatacha Pinatel0Catherine Plotton1Bruno Pozzetto2Xavier Gocko3Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Jacques Lisfranc, University Jean Monnet, 42000 Saint-Etienne, FranceDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Jacques Lisfranc, University Jean Monnet, 42000 Saint-Etienne, FranceLaboratory of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, 42000 Saint-Etienne, FranceDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Jacques Lisfranc, University Jean Monnet, 42000 Saint-Etienne, FranceVaccine hesitancy (VH) is defined as “<i>delaying or refusing a secure vaccine despite its availability</i>”. This hesitancy affects caregivers and more specifically nurses. The purpose of this study is to assess determinants of influenza VH in the nurse’s community. We conducted a systematic review of qualitative literature according to criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the synthesis of Qualitative Research from 2009 until October 2020. Eleven qualitative studies analysed (ten thematic content analyses and one grounded theory method) found three main factors in VH. The first determinant was the benefit–risk equation considered as unfavourable due to an ineffective vaccine and fears about adverse effects as the pain of the injection. Wrong immunological beliefs brought into hesitancy. Disease barriers (hand washing and masks) and personal immunity were regarded as more effective than the vaccine. Lastly, dehumanised vaccination and the difficulties of access to healthcare were institutional determinants. Nurses ask for a vaccine promotion by hierarchy and doctors with transparent information and respect for autonomy. The availability of vaccines and methods of pain control seem to be some tracks to reduce nurses’ VH.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/7/997vaccine hesitancyflu/influenza vaccinesqualitative research
spellingShingle Natacha Pinatel
Catherine Plotton
Bruno Pozzetto
Xavier Gocko
Nurses’ Influenza Vaccination and Hesitancy: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature
Vaccines
vaccine hesitancy
flu/influenza vaccines
qualitative research
title Nurses’ Influenza Vaccination and Hesitancy: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature
title_full Nurses’ Influenza Vaccination and Hesitancy: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature
title_fullStr Nurses’ Influenza Vaccination and Hesitancy: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature
title_full_unstemmed Nurses’ Influenza Vaccination and Hesitancy: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature
title_short Nurses’ Influenza Vaccination and Hesitancy: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature
title_sort nurses influenza vaccination and hesitancy a systematic review of qualitative literature
topic vaccine hesitancy
flu/influenza vaccines
qualitative research
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/7/997
work_keys_str_mv AT natachapinatel nursesinfluenzavaccinationandhesitancyasystematicreviewofqualitativeliterature
AT catherineplotton nursesinfluenzavaccinationandhesitancyasystematicreviewofqualitativeliterature
AT brunopozzetto nursesinfluenzavaccinationandhesitancyasystematicreviewofqualitativeliterature
AT xaviergocko nursesinfluenzavaccinationandhesitancyasystematicreviewofqualitativeliterature