Expectations modulate the magnitude of attentional capture by auditory events.
What determines the magnitude of attentional capture by deviant sound events? We combined the cross-modal oddball distraction paradigm with sequence learning to address this question. Participants responded to visual targets, each preceded by tones that formed a repetitive cross-trial standard seque...
Main Authors: | Anatole Nöstl, John E Marsh, Patrik Sörqvist |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3492454?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
What we expect is not always what we get: evidence for both the direction-of-change and the specific-stimulus hypotheses of auditory attentional capture.
by: Anatole Nöstl, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Hemispheric specialisation in selective attention and short-term memory: A fine-coarse model of left and right ear disadvantages
by: John E. Marsh, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Who needs cream and sugar when there is eco-labeling? Taste and willingness to pay for "eco-friendly" coffee.
by: Patrik Sörqvist, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
The role of working memory capacity in auditory distraction: A review
by: Patrik Sorqvist
Published: (2010-01-01) -
Differences in Auditory Distraction between Adults and Children: A Duplex-mechanism Approach
by: Tanya N. Joseph, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)