Bifactor Models of Religious and Spiritual Struggles: Distinct from Religiousness and Distress

The Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale (RSS) measures important psychological constructs in an underemphasized section of the overlap between religion and well-being. Are religious/spiritual struggles distinct from religiousness, distress, and each other? To test the RSS’ internal discriminant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nick Stauner, Julie J. Exline, Joshua B. Grubbs, Kenneth I. Pargament, David F. Bradley, Alex Uzdavines
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-06-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/6/68
_version_ 1817997932754894848
author Nick Stauner
Julie J. Exline
Joshua B. Grubbs
Kenneth I. Pargament
David F. Bradley
Alex Uzdavines
author_facet Nick Stauner
Julie J. Exline
Joshua B. Grubbs
Kenneth I. Pargament
David F. Bradley
Alex Uzdavines
author_sort Nick Stauner
collection DOAJ
description The Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale (RSS) measures important psychological constructs in an underemphasized section of the overlap between religion and well-being. Are religious/spiritual struggles distinct from religiousness, distress, and each other? To test the RSS’ internal discriminant validity, we replicated the original six-factor measurement model across five large samples (N = 5705) and tested the fit of a restricted bifactor model, which supported the mutual viability of multidimensional and unidimensional scoring systems for the RSS. Additionally, we explored a bifactor model with correlated group factors that exhibited optimal fit statistics. This model maintained the correlations among the original factors while extracting a general factor from the RSS. This general factor’s strong correlations with religious participation and belief salience suggested that this factor resembles religiousness itself. Estimating this general factor seemed to improve Demonic and Moral struggles’ independence from religiousness, but did not change any factor’s correlations with neuroticism, depression, anxiety, and stress. These distress factors correlated with most of the independent group factors corresponding to the original dimensions of the RSS, especially Ultimate Meaning and Divine struggles. These analyses demonstrate the discriminant validity of religious/spiritual struggles and the complexity of their relationships with religiousness and distress.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T02:45:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-53ef31dea4004b9ebf67be82f489eb0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T02:45:32Z
publishDate 2016-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-53ef31dea4004b9ebf67be82f489eb0a2022-12-22T02:16:33ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442016-06-01766810.3390/rel7060068rel7060068Bifactor Models of Religious and Spiritual Struggles: Distinct from Religiousness and DistressNick Stauner0Julie J. Exline1Joshua B. Grubbs2Kenneth I. Pargament3David F. Bradley4Alex Uzdavines5Department of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USADepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USADepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USADepartment of Psycholog, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USADepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USADepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USAThe Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale (RSS) measures important psychological constructs in an underemphasized section of the overlap between religion and well-being. Are religious/spiritual struggles distinct from religiousness, distress, and each other? To test the RSS’ internal discriminant validity, we replicated the original six-factor measurement model across five large samples (N = 5705) and tested the fit of a restricted bifactor model, which supported the mutual viability of multidimensional and unidimensional scoring systems for the RSS. Additionally, we explored a bifactor model with correlated group factors that exhibited optimal fit statistics. This model maintained the correlations among the original factors while extracting a general factor from the RSS. This general factor’s strong correlations with religious participation and belief salience suggested that this factor resembles religiousness itself. Estimating this general factor seemed to improve Demonic and Moral struggles’ independence from religiousness, but did not change any factor’s correlations with neuroticism, depression, anxiety, and stress. These distress factors correlated with most of the independent group factors corresponding to the original dimensions of the RSS, especially Ultimate Meaning and Divine struggles. These analyses demonstrate the discriminant validity of religious/spiritual struggles and the complexity of their relationships with religiousness and distress.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/6/68religionspiritualitystrugglebifactormeasurementlatentconfirmatory factor analysisdistressdepressionanxiety
spellingShingle Nick Stauner
Julie J. Exline
Joshua B. Grubbs
Kenneth I. Pargament
David F. Bradley
Alex Uzdavines
Bifactor Models of Religious and Spiritual Struggles: Distinct from Religiousness and Distress
Religions
religion
spirituality
struggle
bifactor
measurement
latent
confirmatory factor analysis
distress
depression
anxiety
title Bifactor Models of Religious and Spiritual Struggles: Distinct from Religiousness and Distress
title_full Bifactor Models of Religious and Spiritual Struggles: Distinct from Religiousness and Distress
title_fullStr Bifactor Models of Religious and Spiritual Struggles: Distinct from Religiousness and Distress
title_full_unstemmed Bifactor Models of Religious and Spiritual Struggles: Distinct from Religiousness and Distress
title_short Bifactor Models of Religious and Spiritual Struggles: Distinct from Religiousness and Distress
title_sort bifactor models of religious and spiritual struggles distinct from religiousness and distress
topic religion
spirituality
struggle
bifactor
measurement
latent
confirmatory factor analysis
distress
depression
anxiety
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/6/68
work_keys_str_mv AT nickstauner bifactormodelsofreligiousandspiritualstrugglesdistinctfromreligiousnessanddistress
AT juliejexline bifactormodelsofreligiousandspiritualstrugglesdistinctfromreligiousnessanddistress
AT joshuabgrubbs bifactormodelsofreligiousandspiritualstrugglesdistinctfromreligiousnessanddistress
AT kennethipargament bifactormodelsofreligiousandspiritualstrugglesdistinctfromreligiousnessanddistress
AT davidfbradley bifactormodelsofreligiousandspiritualstrugglesdistinctfromreligiousnessanddistress
AT alexuzdavines bifactormodelsofreligiousandspiritualstrugglesdistinctfromreligiousnessanddistress