The evaluation of root surface modifications after different subgingival mechanical instrumentation techniques – an in vitro study
Objectives. The aim of this in vitro study was to observe through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the surface morphology of root samples treated with different mechanical instrumentation methods and the additional application of a nanocolloidal silver-based antiseptic solution. Material and meth...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Amaltea Medical Publishing House
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Romanian Journal of Stomatology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://rjs.com.ro/articles/2023.1/RJS_2023_1_Art-08.pdf |
| _version_ | 1827818457464307712 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrada Soanca Alexandra Roman Andreea Ciurea Iulia Cristina Micu Andrei Picos Sofia Iozon (Ene) |
| author_facet | Andrada Soanca Alexandra Roman Andreea Ciurea Iulia Cristina Micu Andrei Picos Sofia Iozon (Ene) |
| author_sort | Andrada Soanca |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives. The aim of this in vitro study was to observe through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the surface morphology of root samples treated with different mechanical instrumentation methods and the additional application of a nanocolloidal silver-based antiseptic solution.
Material and methods. Root samples were prepared from extracted molars and divided in four groups: group 1 of samples was instrumented with Gracey curette (7/8), group 2 of samples was instrumented with ultrasonic tip 1S, group 3 of samples was instrumented with ultrasonic tips 1S plus H4R/L, group 4 of samples was treated with ultrasonic tips 1S plus H4R/L and application of the silver-based antiseptic solution. All samples were then subjected to SEM examination.
Outcomes. Group 1 of samples presented a smoother surface compared to the samples in the other groups. Group 2, 3 and 4 displayed superficial grooves parallel to the direction of action of the ultrasonic tip. In group 3 and 4, root planning with tip H4R/L did not ameliorate the smoothness of the surface. The smear layer was present, regardless the instrumentation method. In group 4, the additional application of the antiseptic solution did not influence the surface morphology or the amount of smear layer.
Conclusions. Gracey curettes created a smoother radicular surface compared to ultrasonic tips. Smear layer was obvious on the radicular surfaces, no matter the instrumentation method. The application of the silver-based antiseptic solution had no additional impact on surface morphology. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T00:55:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-53f355667b2a4e69944a2177bb7c5633 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1843-0805 2069-6078 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T00:55:06Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | Amaltea Medical Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Romanian Journal of Stomatology |
| spelling | doaj.art-53f355667b2a4e69944a2177bb7c56332023-09-14T14:09:09ZengAmaltea Medical Publishing HouseRomanian Journal of Stomatology1843-08052069-60782023-03-01681434910.37897/RJS.2023.1.8The evaluation of root surface modifications after different subgingival mechanical instrumentation techniques – an in vitro studyAndrada Soanca0Alexandra Roman1Andreea Ciurea2Iulia Cristina Micu3Andrei Picos4Sofia Iozon (Ene)5Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Department of Prevention in Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaDepartment of Odontology, Endodontics and Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaObjectives. The aim of this in vitro study was to observe through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the surface morphology of root samples treated with different mechanical instrumentation methods and the additional application of a nanocolloidal silver-based antiseptic solution. Material and methods. Root samples were prepared from extracted molars and divided in four groups: group 1 of samples was instrumented with Gracey curette (7/8), group 2 of samples was instrumented with ultrasonic tip 1S, group 3 of samples was instrumented with ultrasonic tips 1S plus H4R/L, group 4 of samples was treated with ultrasonic tips 1S plus H4R/L and application of the silver-based antiseptic solution. All samples were then subjected to SEM examination. Outcomes. Group 1 of samples presented a smoother surface compared to the samples in the other groups. Group 2, 3 and 4 displayed superficial grooves parallel to the direction of action of the ultrasonic tip. In group 3 and 4, root planning with tip H4R/L did not ameliorate the smoothness of the surface. The smear layer was present, regardless the instrumentation method. In group 4, the additional application of the antiseptic solution did not influence the surface morphology or the amount of smear layer. Conclusions. Gracey curettes created a smoother radicular surface compared to ultrasonic tips. Smear layer was obvious on the radicular surfaces, no matter the instrumentation method. The application of the silver-based antiseptic solution had no additional impact on surface morphology.https://rjs.com.ro/articles/2023.1/RJS_2023_1_Art-08.pdfsubgingival mechanical instrumentationroot surfaceantisepticsilver nanoparticlesscanning electron microscopy |
| spellingShingle | Andrada Soanca Alexandra Roman Andreea Ciurea Iulia Cristina Micu Andrei Picos Sofia Iozon (Ene) The evaluation of root surface modifications after different subgingival mechanical instrumentation techniques – an in vitro study Romanian Journal of Stomatology subgingival mechanical instrumentation root surface antiseptic silver nanoparticles scanning electron microscopy |
| title | The evaluation of root surface modifications after different subgingival mechanical instrumentation techniques – an in vitro study |
| title_full | The evaluation of root surface modifications after different subgingival mechanical instrumentation techniques – an in vitro study |
| title_fullStr | The evaluation of root surface modifications after different subgingival mechanical instrumentation techniques – an in vitro study |
| title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of root surface modifications after different subgingival mechanical instrumentation techniques – an in vitro study |
| title_short | The evaluation of root surface modifications after different subgingival mechanical instrumentation techniques – an in vitro study |
| title_sort | evaluation of root surface modifications after different subgingival mechanical instrumentation techniques an in vitro study |
| topic | subgingival mechanical instrumentation root surface antiseptic silver nanoparticles scanning electron microscopy |
| url | https://rjs.com.ro/articles/2023.1/RJS_2023_1_Art-08.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andradasoanca theevaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT alexandraroman theevaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT andreeaciurea theevaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT iuliacristinamicu theevaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT andreipicos theevaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT sofiaiozonene theevaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT andradasoanca evaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT alexandraroman evaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT andreeaciurea evaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT iuliacristinamicu evaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT andreipicos evaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy AT sofiaiozonene evaluationofrootsurfacemodificationsafterdifferentsubgingivalmechanicalinstrumentationtechniquesaninvitrostudy |