TO THE QUESTION OF THE PRONOUN ONE

The relevance of the selected topic is due to the fact that in the linguistic literature the volume of return pronouns is ambiguously interpreted, on the one hand, there are several different classifications of pronouns on semantics, on the other hand, the pronoun one refers to different semantic ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Irina V Trufanova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2018-12-01
Series:RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/semiotics-semantics/article/viewFile/19426/16172
Description
Summary:The relevance of the selected topic is due to the fact that in the linguistic literature the volume of return pronouns is ambiguously interpreted, on the one hand, there are several different classifications of pronouns on semantics, on the other hand, the pronoun one refers to different semantic categories. One was not the subject of a special linguistic study. The author's goal was to substantiate the belonging of one to the return pronouns and to establish his place in the group of returnable costs. The material was collected by us in the National Corps of the Russian language. The method of substituting one of each other's pronouns yielded the following conclusions. One has a set of homonyms among adjectives, adverbs, conjunctions, opening words. The return pronoun one in all case forms allows a substitution for each other, its homonyms do not allow such a replacement. The method of replacing each other in place of one and the same allows us to establish that before us: a reflexive pronoun or phraseology belonging to another part of the speech. In the accusative case, the pronoun being analyzed has forms for replacing the names of animate and inanimate subjects, it is not always possible to replace it with one another in other cases, when subjects of the same action are not persons. One is related to the animated and the inanimate, and each other is primarily animate. The results of this study can be used in lexicography when specifying the parttime homonyms of homonyms one and one in morphology in the development of semantic classifications of pronouns.
ISSN:2313-2299
2411-1236