The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018–2020): an observational study [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Background: Scientists are increasingly concerned with making their work easy to verify and build upon. Associated practices include sharing data, materials, and analytic scripts, and preregistering protocols. This shift towards increased transparency and rigor has been referred to as a “credibility...
Main Authors: | Sarah Schiavone, Alex Holcombe, Ruby Bishop, Simine Vazire, Natali Dilevski, Rosemary Gatfield-Jeffries, Jason Chin, Kathryn Zeiler |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2023-02-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/12-144/v1 |
Similar Items
-
The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018–2020): an observational study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
by: Sarah Schiavone, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Where next for partial randomisation of research funding? The feasibility of RCTs and alternatives [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Tom Stafford, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
A systematic assessment of preclinical multilaboratory studies and a comparison to single laboratory studies
by: Victoria T Hunniford, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Region of Attainable Redaction, an extension of Ellipse of Insignificance analysis for gauging impacts of data redaction in dichotomous outcome trials
by: David Robert Grimes
Published: (2024-01-01) -
CREDIBILITY AND TRANSPARENCY - SOURCES FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCES
by: Vorzsak Magdalena, et al.
Published: (2009-05-01)