Comparison of statistical low-frequency earthquake activity models

Abstract Slow earthquakes are slow fault slip events. Quantifying and monitoring slow earthquake activity characteristics are important, because they may change before large earthquakes occur. Statistical seismicity models are useful for quantifying seismicity characteristics. However, no standard s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tomoaki Nishikawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-04-01
Series:Earth, Planets and Space
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-024-02007-6
_version_ 1797199605817933824
author Tomoaki Nishikawa
author_facet Tomoaki Nishikawa
author_sort Tomoaki Nishikawa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Slow earthquakes are slow fault slip events. Quantifying and monitoring slow earthquake activity characteristics are important, because they may change before large earthquakes occur. Statistical seismicity models are useful for quantifying seismicity characteristics. However, no standard statistical model exists for slow earthquake activity. This study used a high-quality catalog of low-frequency earthquakes (LFEs), a type of slow earthquake, in the Nankai subduction zone from April 2004 to August 2015 and conducted the first comparison of existing statistical LFE activity models to determine which model better describes LFE activity. Based on this comparison, this study proposes a new hybrid model that incorporates existing model features. The new model considers the LFE activity history in a manner similar to the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model and represents the LFE aftershock rate (subsequent LFE occurrence rate) with a small number of model parameters, as in the Omori–Utsu aftershock law for regular earthquakes. The results show that the proposed model outperforms other existing models. However, the new model cannot reproduce a feature of LFE activity: the sudden cessation of intense LFE bursts. This is because the new model superimposes multiple aftershock activities and predicts extremely high seismicity rates during and after the LFE bursts. I suggest that reproducing and successfully predicting the sudden cessation of intense LFE bursts is critical for the further improvement of statistical LFE activity models. In addition, the empirical equations formulated in this study for the LFE aftershock rates may be useful for future statistical and physical modeling of LFE activity. Graphical Abstract
first_indexed 2024-04-24T07:18:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5414618c65cc4e2e809a045edbedfc98
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1880-5981
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T07:18:25Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Earth, Planets and Space
spelling doaj.art-5414618c65cc4e2e809a045edbedfc982024-04-21T11:11:52ZengSpringerOpenEarth, Planets and Space1880-59812024-04-0176112110.1186/s40623-024-02007-6Comparison of statistical low-frequency earthquake activity modelsTomoaki Nishikawa0Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto UniversityAbstract Slow earthquakes are slow fault slip events. Quantifying and monitoring slow earthquake activity characteristics are important, because they may change before large earthquakes occur. Statistical seismicity models are useful for quantifying seismicity characteristics. However, no standard statistical model exists for slow earthquake activity. This study used a high-quality catalog of low-frequency earthquakes (LFEs), a type of slow earthquake, in the Nankai subduction zone from April 2004 to August 2015 and conducted the first comparison of existing statistical LFE activity models to determine which model better describes LFE activity. Based on this comparison, this study proposes a new hybrid model that incorporates existing model features. The new model considers the LFE activity history in a manner similar to the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model and represents the LFE aftershock rate (subsequent LFE occurrence rate) with a small number of model parameters, as in the Omori–Utsu aftershock law for regular earthquakes. The results show that the proposed model outperforms other existing models. However, the new model cannot reproduce a feature of LFE activity: the sudden cessation of intense LFE bursts. This is because the new model superimposes multiple aftershock activities and predicts extremely high seismicity rates during and after the LFE bursts. I suggest that reproducing and successfully predicting the sudden cessation of intense LFE bursts is critical for the further improvement of statistical LFE activity models. In addition, the empirical equations formulated in this study for the LFE aftershock rates may be useful for future statistical and physical modeling of LFE activity. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-024-02007-6Low-frequency earthquakeStatistical modelSeismicityNankai TroughSubduction zoneSlow earthquake
spellingShingle Tomoaki Nishikawa
Comparison of statistical low-frequency earthquake activity models
Earth, Planets and Space
Low-frequency earthquake
Statistical model
Seismicity
Nankai Trough
Subduction zone
Slow earthquake
title Comparison of statistical low-frequency earthquake activity models
title_full Comparison of statistical low-frequency earthquake activity models
title_fullStr Comparison of statistical low-frequency earthquake activity models
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of statistical low-frequency earthquake activity models
title_short Comparison of statistical low-frequency earthquake activity models
title_sort comparison of statistical low frequency earthquake activity models
topic Low-frequency earthquake
Statistical model
Seismicity
Nankai Trough
Subduction zone
Slow earthquake
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-024-02007-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tomoakinishikawa comparisonofstatisticallowfrequencyearthquakeactivitymodels