Predictors of performance on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test.
We explored factors associated with performance on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). 180 undergraduate students completed the human RMET requiring forced-choice mental state judgment; a control human Age Eyes Test (AET) requiring age judgment; a Cat Eyes Test (CET) requiring mental state...
Main Authors: | Clare M Eddy, Peter C Hansen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235529 |
Similar Items
-
The non-human animal reading the mind in the eyes test (NARMET): A new measure for the assessment of social cognition
by: Clare M. Eddy, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Theory of mind is not theory of emotion: A cautionary note on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test
by: Oakley, B, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Development and validation of the Korean version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test.
by: Hye-Rin Lee, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Validity of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test in a Brazilian Sample
by: Fabiano Koich Miguel, et al. -
Croatian Adaptation of the Revised Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
by: Marina Kotrla Topić, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)