Predictive model of the risk of formation of mental deadaptation in chemical production workers

Introduction According to WHO, 30-50% of workers experience psychological stress, which contributes to the development of mental and psychosomatic disorders. It’s important to develop the problem of prenosological diagnosis and determination of criteria for the formation of mental maladaptation as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Kuzmina, R. Garipova, N. Mollaeva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022-06-01
Series:European Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0924933822017679/type/journal_article
Description
Summary:Introduction According to WHO, 30-50% of workers experience psychological stress, which contributes to the development of mental and psychosomatic disorders. It’s important to develop the problem of prenosological diagnosis and determination of criteria for the formation of mental maladaptation as predictors of mental disorders in relation to occupational risk factors. Mental disorders in workers in a dangerous environment are of the nature of prenosological, not clearly delineated by a circle of diagnostic symptoms. Objectives 1st chemical factor in combination with noise and emotional stress, 2d chemical factor in combination with a threat to life (explosion and fire hazard), 3d working in conditions of noise and emotional stress Methods The influence of working environment conditions and non-production factors on the formation Results Predicting the development of mental mailadaptive state model was developed Conclusions Vegetative disorders are most likely to manifest in group 1, comorbid of which with obsessive-phobic disorders and depressive spectrum disorders. The group 2 is characterized by astheno-vegetative symptoms in correlation with the conversion type of response. In the third professional group, the nature of predictors is characterized by a pronounced isolation of groups of symptoms, the leading of which is the vegetative pattern.Vegetative syndroms are most likely to manifest in group 1, comorbid of which is obsessive-phobic disorders and depressive spectrum disorders. The group 2 is characterized by astheno-vegetative symptoms in correlation with the conversion type of response. In the third professional group, the nature of predictors is characterized by a pronounced isolation of groups of symptoms, the leading of which is the vegetative pattern. Disclosure No significant relationships.
ISSN:0924-9338
1778-3585