Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study
BackgroundCOVID-19 has created serious mental health consequences for essential workers or people who have become unemployed as a result of the pandemic. Digital mental health tools have the potential to address this problem in a timely and efficient manner. Objec...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2021-08-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Mental Health |
| Online Access: | https://mental.jmir.org/2021/8/e28360 |
| _version_ | 1797735799147462656 |
|---|---|
| author | Felicia Mata-Greve Morgan Johnson Michael D Pullmann Emily C Friedman Isabell Griffith Fillipo Katherine A Comtois Patricia Arean |
| author_facet | Felicia Mata-Greve Morgan Johnson Michael D Pullmann Emily C Friedman Isabell Griffith Fillipo Katherine A Comtois Patricia Arean |
| author_sort | Felicia Mata-Greve |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundCOVID-19 has created serious mental health consequences for essential workers or people who have become unemployed as a result of the pandemic. Digital mental health tools have the potential to address this problem in a timely and efficient manner.
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to document the extent of digital mental health tool (DMHT) use by essential workers and those unemployed due to COVID-19, including asking participants to rate the usability and user burden of the DMHT they used most to cope. We also explored which aspects and features of DMHTs were seen as necessary for managing stress during a pandemic by having participants design their own ideal DMHT.
MethodsA total of 2000 people were recruited from an online research community (Prolific) to complete a one-time survey about mental health symptoms, DMHT use, and preferred digital mental health features.
ResultsThe final sample included 1987 US residents that identified as either an essential worker or someone who was unemployed due to COVID-19. Almost three-quarters of the sample (1479/1987, 74.8%) reported clinically significant emotional distress. Only 14.2% (277/1957) of the sample used a DMHT to cope with stress associated with COVID-19. Of those who used DMHTs to cope with COVID-19, meditation apps were the most common (119/261, 45.6%). Usability was broadly in the acceptable range, although participants unemployed due to COVID-19 were less likely to report user burden with DMHTs than essential workers (t198.1=–3.89, P<.001). Individuals with emotional distress reported higher financial burden for their DMHT than nondistressed individuals (t69.0=–3.21, P=.01). When the sample was provided the option to build their own DMHT, the most desired features were a combination of mindfulness/meditation (1271/1987, 64.0%), information or education (1254/1987, 63.1%), distraction tools (1170/1987, 58.9%), symptom tracking for mood and sleep (1160/1987, 58.4%), link to mental health resources (1140/1987, 57.4%), and positive psychology (1131/1986, 56.9%). Subgroups by employment, distress, and previous DMHT use status had varied preferences. Of those who did not use a DMHT to cope with COVID-19, most indicated that they did not consider looking for such a tool to help with coping (1179/1710, 68.9%).
ConclusionsDespite the potential need for DMHTs, this study found that the use of such tools remains similar to prepandemic levels. This study also found that regardless of the level of distress or even past experience using an app to cope with COVID-19, it is possible to develop a COVID-19 coping app that would appeal to a majority of essential workers and unemployed persons. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:04:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-54453841dc9a464895d54878e28c516d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2368-7959 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:04:18Z |
| publishDate | 2021-08-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Mental Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-54453841dc9a464895d54878e28c516d2023-08-28T18:28:14ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Mental Health2368-79592021-08-0188e2836010.2196/28360Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey StudyFelicia Mata-Grevehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6218-2917Morgan Johnsonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2081-6176Michael D Pullmannhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-864XEmily C Friedmanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9520-0499Isabell Griffith Fillipohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6879-3268Katherine A Comtoishttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0398-4108Patricia Areanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-6319 BackgroundCOVID-19 has created serious mental health consequences for essential workers or people who have become unemployed as a result of the pandemic. Digital mental health tools have the potential to address this problem in a timely and efficient manner. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to document the extent of digital mental health tool (DMHT) use by essential workers and those unemployed due to COVID-19, including asking participants to rate the usability and user burden of the DMHT they used most to cope. We also explored which aspects and features of DMHTs were seen as necessary for managing stress during a pandemic by having participants design their own ideal DMHT. MethodsA total of 2000 people were recruited from an online research community (Prolific) to complete a one-time survey about mental health symptoms, DMHT use, and preferred digital mental health features. ResultsThe final sample included 1987 US residents that identified as either an essential worker or someone who was unemployed due to COVID-19. Almost three-quarters of the sample (1479/1987, 74.8%) reported clinically significant emotional distress. Only 14.2% (277/1957) of the sample used a DMHT to cope with stress associated with COVID-19. Of those who used DMHTs to cope with COVID-19, meditation apps were the most common (119/261, 45.6%). Usability was broadly in the acceptable range, although participants unemployed due to COVID-19 were less likely to report user burden with DMHTs than essential workers (t198.1=–3.89, P<.001). Individuals with emotional distress reported higher financial burden for their DMHT than nondistressed individuals (t69.0=–3.21, P=.01). When the sample was provided the option to build their own DMHT, the most desired features were a combination of mindfulness/meditation (1271/1987, 64.0%), information or education (1254/1987, 63.1%), distraction tools (1170/1987, 58.9%), symptom tracking for mood and sleep (1160/1987, 58.4%), link to mental health resources (1140/1987, 57.4%), and positive psychology (1131/1986, 56.9%). Subgroups by employment, distress, and previous DMHT use status had varied preferences. Of those who did not use a DMHT to cope with COVID-19, most indicated that they did not consider looking for such a tool to help with coping (1179/1710, 68.9%). ConclusionsDespite the potential need for DMHTs, this study found that the use of such tools remains similar to prepandemic levels. This study also found that regardless of the level of distress or even past experience using an app to cope with COVID-19, it is possible to develop a COVID-19 coping app that would appeal to a majority of essential workers and unemployed persons.https://mental.jmir.org/2021/8/e28360 |
| spellingShingle | Felicia Mata-Greve Morgan Johnson Michael D Pullmann Emily C Friedman Isabell Griffith Fillipo Katherine A Comtois Patricia Arean Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study JMIR Mental Health |
| title | Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study |
| title_full | Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study |
| title_fullStr | Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study |
| title_short | Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study |
| title_sort | mental health and the perceived usability of digital mental health tools among essential workers and people unemployed due to covid 19 cross sectional survey study |
| url | https://mental.jmir.org/2021/8/e28360 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT feliciamatagreve mentalhealthandtheperceivedusabilityofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsamongessentialworkersandpeopleunemployedduetocovid19crosssectionalsurveystudy AT morganjohnson mentalhealthandtheperceivedusabilityofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsamongessentialworkersandpeopleunemployedduetocovid19crosssectionalsurveystudy AT michaeldpullmann mentalhealthandtheperceivedusabilityofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsamongessentialworkersandpeopleunemployedduetocovid19crosssectionalsurveystudy AT emilycfriedman mentalhealthandtheperceivedusabilityofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsamongessentialworkersandpeopleunemployedduetocovid19crosssectionalsurveystudy AT isabellgriffithfillipo mentalhealthandtheperceivedusabilityofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsamongessentialworkersandpeopleunemployedduetocovid19crosssectionalsurveystudy AT katherineacomtois mentalhealthandtheperceivedusabilityofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsamongessentialworkersandpeopleunemployedduetocovid19crosssectionalsurveystudy AT patriciaarean mentalhealthandtheperceivedusabilityofdigitalmentalhealthtoolsamongessentialworkersandpeopleunemployedduetocovid19crosssectionalsurveystudy |