Does it matter that standard preparedness indices did not predict COVID-19 outcomes?
Abstract A number of scientific publications and commentaries have suggested that standard preparedness indices such as the Global Health Security Index (GHSI) and Joint External Evaluation (JEE) scores did not predict COVID-19 outcomes. To some, the failure of these metrics to be predictive demonst...
Main Authors: | Michael A. Stoto, Christopher D. Nelson, John D. Kraemer |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-09-01
|
Series: | Globalization and Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00973-2 |
Similar Items
-
Impact of pre-COVID-19 epidemic preparedness on the trajectory of the pandemic in African countries
by: Talkmore Maruta, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
The costs of improving health emergency preparedness: A systematic review and analysis of multi-country studies
by: Lorcan Clarke, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01) -
Analysis of sectoral participation in the development of Joint External Evaluations
by: Emily McPhee, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01) -
A Productive Proposed Search Syntax for Health Disaster Preparedness Research
by: Behnaz Rastegarfar, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
The Role of Scientific Collections in Scientific Preparedness
by: Diane DiEuliis
Published: (2015-08-01)