Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
(1) The consistency and magnitude of the prevalence of Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) individuals are undetermined, limiting efficient detection of cases. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of CHR-P individuals systematically assessed in the general population or clinical samples. (2) PRI...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Brain Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1544 |
_version_ | 1797511002809434112 |
---|---|
author | Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo Scott W. Woods Georgia Drymonitou Héctor de Diego Paolo Fusar-Poli |
author_facet | Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo Scott W. Woods Georgia Drymonitou Héctor de Diego Paolo Fusar-Poli |
author_sort | Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | (1) The consistency and magnitude of the prevalence of Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) individuals are undetermined, limiting efficient detection of cases. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of CHR-P individuals systematically assessed in the general population or clinical samples. (2) PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant (PROSPERO: CRD42020168672) meta-analysis of multiple databases until 21/01/21: a random-effects model meta-analysis, heterogeneity analysis, publication bias and quality assessment, sensitivity analysis—according to the gold-standard CHR-P and pre-screening instruments—leave-one-study-out analyses, and meta-regressions were conducted. (3) 35 studies were included, with 37,135 individuals tested and 1554 CHR-P individuals identified (median age = 19.3 years, Interquartile range (IQR) = 15.8–22.1; 52.2% females, IQR = 38.7–64.4). In the general population (k = 13, <i>n</i> = 26,835 individuals evaluated), the prevalence of the CHR-P state was 1.7% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.0–2.9%). In clinical samples (k = 22, <i>n</i> = 10,300 individuals evaluated), the prevalence of the CHR-P state was 19.2% (95% CI = 12.9–27.7%). Using a pre-screening instrument was associated with false negatives (5.6%, 95% CI = 2.2–13.3%) and a lower CHR-P prevalence (11.5%, 95% CI = 6.2–20.5%) compared to using CHR-P instruments only (28.5%, 95% CI = 23.0–34.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). (4) The prevalence of the CHR-P state is low in the general population and ten times higher in clinical samples. The prevalence of CHR-P may increase with a higher proportion of females in the general population and with a younger population in clinical samples. The CHR-P state may be unrecognized in routine clinical practice. These findings can refine detection and preventive strategies. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T05:39:16Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-545c59ffca9b412e8017658a9dd8fc63 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-3425 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T05:39:16Z |
publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Brain Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-545c59ffca9b412e8017658a9dd8fc632023-11-22T22:39:14ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252021-11-011111154410.3390/brainsci11111544Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisGonzalo Salazar de Pablo0Scott W. Woods1Georgia Drymonitou2Héctor de Diego3Paolo Fusar-Poli4Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UKDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USASussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke RG21 8UN, UKInstitute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), CIBERSAM, 28040 Madrid, SpainEarly Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK(1) The consistency and magnitude of the prevalence of Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) individuals are undetermined, limiting efficient detection of cases. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of CHR-P individuals systematically assessed in the general population or clinical samples. (2) PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant (PROSPERO: CRD42020168672) meta-analysis of multiple databases until 21/01/21: a random-effects model meta-analysis, heterogeneity analysis, publication bias and quality assessment, sensitivity analysis—according to the gold-standard CHR-P and pre-screening instruments—leave-one-study-out analyses, and meta-regressions were conducted. (3) 35 studies were included, with 37,135 individuals tested and 1554 CHR-P individuals identified (median age = 19.3 years, Interquartile range (IQR) = 15.8–22.1; 52.2% females, IQR = 38.7–64.4). In the general population (k = 13, <i>n</i> = 26,835 individuals evaluated), the prevalence of the CHR-P state was 1.7% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.0–2.9%). In clinical samples (k = 22, <i>n</i> = 10,300 individuals evaluated), the prevalence of the CHR-P state was 19.2% (95% CI = 12.9–27.7%). Using a pre-screening instrument was associated with false negatives (5.6%, 95% CI = 2.2–13.3%) and a lower CHR-P prevalence (11.5%, 95% CI = 6.2–20.5%) compared to using CHR-P instruments only (28.5%, 95% CI = 23.0–34.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). (4) The prevalence of the CHR-P state is low in the general population and ten times higher in clinical samples. The prevalence of CHR-P may increase with a higher proportion of females in the general population and with a younger population in clinical samples. The CHR-P state may be unrecognized in routine clinical practice. These findings can refine detection and preventive strategies.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1544schizophreniaCHRpreventionclinical settingscommunitymeta-analytic evidence |
spellingShingle | Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo Scott W. Woods Georgia Drymonitou Héctor de Diego Paolo Fusar-Poli Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Brain Sciences schizophrenia CHR prevention clinical settings community meta-analytic evidence |
title | Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | prevalence of individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis in the general population and clinical samples systematic review and meta analysis |
topic | schizophrenia CHR prevention clinical settings community meta-analytic evidence |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gonzalosalazardepablo prevalenceofindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisinthegeneralpopulationandclinicalsamplessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT scottwwoods prevalenceofindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisinthegeneralpopulationandclinicalsamplessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT georgiadrymonitou prevalenceofindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisinthegeneralpopulationandclinicalsamplessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hectordediego prevalenceofindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisinthegeneralpopulationandclinicalsamplessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT paolofusarpoli prevalenceofindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisinthegeneralpopulationandclinicalsamplessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |