Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) The consistency and magnitude of the prevalence of Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) individuals are undetermined, limiting efficient detection of cases. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of CHR-P individuals systematically assessed in the general population or clinical samples. (2) PRI...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Scott W. Woods, Georgia Drymonitou, Héctor de Diego, Paolo Fusar-Poli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1544
_version_ 1797511002809434112
author Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo
Scott W. Woods
Georgia Drymonitou
Héctor de Diego
Paolo Fusar-Poli
author_facet Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo
Scott W. Woods
Georgia Drymonitou
Héctor de Diego
Paolo Fusar-Poli
author_sort Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo
collection DOAJ
description (1) The consistency and magnitude of the prevalence of Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) individuals are undetermined, limiting efficient detection of cases. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of CHR-P individuals systematically assessed in the general population or clinical samples. (2) PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant (PROSPERO: CRD42020168672) meta-analysis of multiple databases until 21/01/21: a random-effects model meta-analysis, heterogeneity analysis, publication bias and quality assessment, sensitivity analysis—according to the gold-standard CHR-P and pre-screening instruments—leave-one-study-out analyses, and meta-regressions were conducted. (3) 35 studies were included, with 37,135 individuals tested and 1554 CHR-P individuals identified (median age = 19.3 years, Interquartile range (IQR) = 15.8–22.1; 52.2% females, IQR = 38.7–64.4). In the general population (k = 13, <i>n</i> = 26,835 individuals evaluated), the prevalence of the CHR-P state was 1.7% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.0–2.9%). In clinical samples (k = 22, <i>n</i> = 10,300 individuals evaluated), the prevalence of the CHR-P state was 19.2% (95% CI = 12.9–27.7%). Using a pre-screening instrument was associated with false negatives (5.6%, 95% CI = 2.2–13.3%) and a lower CHR-P prevalence (11.5%, 95% CI = 6.2–20.5%) compared to using CHR-P instruments only (28.5%, 95% CI = 23.0–34.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). (4) The prevalence of the CHR-P state is low in the general population and ten times higher in clinical samples. The prevalence of CHR-P may increase with a higher proportion of females in the general population and with a younger population in clinical samples. The CHR-P state may be unrecognized in routine clinical practice. These findings can refine detection and preventive strategies.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:39:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-545c59ffca9b412e8017658a9dd8fc63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:39:16Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-545c59ffca9b412e8017658a9dd8fc632023-11-22T22:39:14ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252021-11-011111154410.3390/brainsci11111544Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisGonzalo Salazar de Pablo0Scott W. Woods1Georgia Drymonitou2Héctor de Diego3Paolo Fusar-Poli4Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UKDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USASussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke RG21 8UN, UKInstitute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), CIBERSAM, 28040 Madrid, SpainEarly Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK(1) The consistency and magnitude of the prevalence of Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) individuals are undetermined, limiting efficient detection of cases. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of CHR-P individuals systematically assessed in the general population or clinical samples. (2) PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant (PROSPERO: CRD42020168672) meta-analysis of multiple databases until 21/01/21: a random-effects model meta-analysis, heterogeneity analysis, publication bias and quality assessment, sensitivity analysis—according to the gold-standard CHR-P and pre-screening instruments—leave-one-study-out analyses, and meta-regressions were conducted. (3) 35 studies were included, with 37,135 individuals tested and 1554 CHR-P individuals identified (median age = 19.3 years, Interquartile range (IQR) = 15.8–22.1; 52.2% females, IQR = 38.7–64.4). In the general population (k = 13, <i>n</i> = 26,835 individuals evaluated), the prevalence of the CHR-P state was 1.7% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.0–2.9%). In clinical samples (k = 22, <i>n</i> = 10,300 individuals evaluated), the prevalence of the CHR-P state was 19.2% (95% CI = 12.9–27.7%). Using a pre-screening instrument was associated with false negatives (5.6%, 95% CI = 2.2–13.3%) and a lower CHR-P prevalence (11.5%, 95% CI = 6.2–20.5%) compared to using CHR-P instruments only (28.5%, 95% CI = 23.0–34.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). (4) The prevalence of the CHR-P state is low in the general population and ten times higher in clinical samples. The prevalence of CHR-P may increase with a higher proportion of females in the general population and with a younger population in clinical samples. The CHR-P state may be unrecognized in routine clinical practice. These findings can refine detection and preventive strategies.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1544schizophreniaCHRpreventionclinical settingscommunitymeta-analytic evidence
spellingShingle Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo
Scott W. Woods
Georgia Drymonitou
Héctor de Diego
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Brain Sciences
schizophrenia
CHR
prevention
clinical settings
community
meta-analytic evidence
title Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort prevalence of individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis in the general population and clinical samples systematic review and meta analysis
topic schizophrenia
CHR
prevention
clinical settings
community
meta-analytic evidence
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1544
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalosalazardepablo prevalenceofindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisinthegeneralpopulationandclinicalsamplessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT scottwwoods prevalenceofindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisinthegeneralpopulationandclinicalsamplessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT georgiadrymonitou prevalenceofindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisinthegeneralpopulationandclinicalsamplessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hectordediego prevalenceofindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisinthegeneralpopulationandclinicalsamplessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT paolofusarpoli prevalenceofindividualsatclinicalhighriskofpsychosisinthegeneralpopulationandclinicalsamplessystematicreviewandmetaanalysis